Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-mgq6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-04T02:41:06.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Bock-Aitkin Procedure—from an EM Algorithm Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Yaowen Hsu
Yaowen Hsu*
Affiliation:
ACT, Inc.
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Yaowen Hsu, ACT, Inc., P.O. Box 168, Iowa City, IA 52243-0168.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between the EM algorithm and the Bock-Aitkin procedure is described with a continuous distribution of ability (latent trait) from an EM-algorithm perspective. Previous work has been restricted to the discrete case from a probit-analysis perspective.

Keywords

item response theorymarginal maximum likelihood estimationEM algorithmBock-Aitkin procedure
Type
Notes And Comments
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 547 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author is grateful to Bradley A. Hanson for valuable discussion and comments. Thanks also go to Terry A. Ackerman, Meichu Fan, Subrata Kundu, and Robert K. Tsutakawa for their help and encouragement in this study.

References

Bock, R. D., Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D., Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, P. W. (1990). On the sampling theory foundations of item response theory models. Psychometrika, 55, 577–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Y., Ackerman, T.A., Fan, M. (1999). The relationship between the Bock-Aitkin procedure and the EM algorithm for IRT model estimation. Iowa City, IA: ACTGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, R.J., Stocking, M.L. (1989). A consumer's guide to LOGIST and BILOG. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 57–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, W.F. (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 55, 293–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.F.J. (1983). On the convergence properties of the EM algorithm. Annals of Statistics, 11, 95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar