Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:18:52.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on a Cognitive Probability Model Incorporating the Serial Position Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

James K. Brewer
Affiliation:
Florida State University
F. J. King
Affiliation:
Florida State University

Abstract

A generalization of a cognitive probability model is proposed utilizing the serial position effect to account for decay in probability of recall. The general nature of the model permits the incorporation of almost any of the recent free-recall serial position curve results. Two examples, hypothesizing different serial position curves, are given.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bush, R. R., and Mosteller, F. Stochastic models for learning, New York: Wiley, 1955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, W. K. Individual behavior in uncertain situations: An interpretation in terms of statistical association theory. In Thrall, R. M., Coombs, C. H., and Davis, R. L. (Eds.), Decision processes. New York: Wiley, 1954, 127138.Google Scholar
Deese, J., and Kaufman, R. A. Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 54, 180187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feigenbaum, E. A., and Simon, H. A. A theory of the serial position effect. British Journal of Psychology, 1962, 53, 307320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuno, Ulara A model for serial verbal learning. Psychometrika, 1965, 30, 323341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, J. E. A cognitive probability model for learning. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 159172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overall, J. E., and Brown, W. L. Recency, frequency and probability in response prediction. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 314323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed