Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-jr95t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T06:31:53.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Model and Algorithm for Multidimensional Scaling with External Constraints on the Distances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Ingwer Borg  and
James C. Lingoes
Ingwer Borg
Affiliation:
Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule
James C. Lingoes*
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to James C. Lingoes, The University of Michigan, 1005 North University Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method for externally constraining certain distances in multidimensional scaling configurations is introduced and illustrated. The approach defines an objective function which is a linear composite of the loss function of the point configuration X relative to the proximity data P and the loss of X relative to a pseudo-data matrix R. The matrix R is set up such that the side constraints to be imposed on X’s distances are expressed by the relations among R’s numerical elements. One then uses a double-phase procedure with relative penalties on the loss components to generate a constrained solution X. Various possibilities for constructing actual MDS algorithms are conceivable: the major classes are defined by the specification of metric or nonmetric loss for data and/or constraints, and by the various possibilities for partitioning the matrices P and R. Further generalizations are introduced by substituting R by a set of R matrices, Ri, i = 1, …r, which opens the way for formulating overlapping constraints as, e.g., in patterns that are both row- and column-conditional at the same time.

Keywords

constrained multidimensional scalinghypothesis testinggeometric modelsnonlinear optimization
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 25 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reference Notes

Guttman, L. Faceted SSA-I, 1976, Jerusalem: Israel Institute of Applied Social Research.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B., Young, F. W., & Seery, J. B. How to use KYST-2, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding, 1978, Murray Hill, N.J.: Bell Laboratories, ca..Google Scholar
Lingoes, J. C. Testing regional hypotheses in multidimensional scaling. Paper presented at the Second International Symposium on Data Analysis and Informatics. Versailles, France, Oct. 17–19, 1979.Google Scholar
Noma, E. & Johnson, J. Constraining nonmetric multidimensional scaling configurations, 1977, Ann Arbor: Human Performance Center, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Noma, E. & Johnson, J. Confirmatory multidimensional scaling. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan Mathematical Psychology Department, 1977.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. & Crawford, G. Multidimensional scaling based on fitting of constrained difference functions. Paper presented at the U.S.-Japan Seminar: Theory, Methods, and Applications of Multidimensional Scaling and Related Techniques. La Jolla, Cal., 1975.Google Scholar
Skarabis, H. Multidimensional scaling with prescribed structures I, 1976, Berlin, Germany, ca.: Freie Universität.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. Personal communication, 1978.Google Scholar

References

Bentler, P. M. & Weeks, D. G. Restricted multidimensional scaling models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1978, 17, 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloxom, B. Constrained multidimensional scaling in N spaces. Psychometrika, 1978, 43, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, I. PAL: point-wise alienation coefficients in multidimensional scaling. Journal of Marketing Research, 1978, 15, 478–479.Google Scholar
Borg, I. & Lingoes, J. C. Multidimensional scaling with side constraints on the distances. In Lingoes, J. C., Roskam, E. E., & Borg, I. (Eds.), Geometric representations of relational data, 2nd ed., Ann Arbor, Mich.: Mathesis Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. D. Models and methods for multidimensional analysis of preferential choice (or other dominance) data. In Lantermann, E.-D. & Feger, H. (Eds.), Similarity and choice, 1979, Bern, Switzerland: Huber.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. D., Pruzansky, S. & Kruskal, J. B. CANDELINC: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters. Psychometrika, 1980, 45, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, C. H. A theory of data, 1964, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Daniel, C. & Wood, F. S. Fitting equations to data, 1971, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, J. & Heiser, W. Convergence of correction-matrix algorithms for multidimensional scaling. In Lingoes, J. C. (Eds.), Geometric representations of relational data, 1977, Ann Arbor, Mich.: Mathesis Press.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, J. & Heiser, W. Multidimensional scaling with restrictions on the configuration. In Krishnaiah, P. R. (Ed.)Multivariate analysis-V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland (in press).Google Scholar
Eisler, H. & Roskam, E. E. Multidimensional similarity: An experimental and theoretical comparison between vector, distance, and set theoretical models. Acta Psychologica, 1977, 41, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, G. Dimensions of color vision. Journal of Psychology, 1954, 38, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. A faceted definition of intelligence. Scripta Hierosolymitana, 1965, 14, 166–181.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 469–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krantz, D. & Tversky, A. Similarity of rectangles: An analysis of subjective dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1975, 12, 4–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, J. B., Wish, M. Multidimensional scaling, 1978, Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingoes, J. C. & Borg, I. CMDA-U: Confirmatory monotone distance analysis-unconditional. Journal of Marketing Research, 1978, 15, 610–611.Google Scholar
Lingoes, J. C. & Roskam, E. E. A mathematical and empirical study of two multidimensional scaling algorithms. Psychometrika, 1973, 38, Monograph Supplement.Google Scholar
Luenberger, D. G. Introduction to linear and nonlinear programming, 1973, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Roskam, E. E. A general system for nonmetric data analysis. In Lingoes, J. C. (Eds.), Geometric representations of relational data, 1977, Ann Arbor, Mich.: Mathesis Press.Google Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. Similarity of rectangles. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 16, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 373–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. The circumplex and related topological manifolds in the study of perception. In Shye, S. (Eds.), Theory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences, 1978, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Skarabis, H. Multidimensional scaling with prescribed structures. In Skarabis, H. & Sint, P. (Eds.), Compstat lectures 1, 1978, Wien, Austria: Physika Verlag.Google Scholar