Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:02:13.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ideal Point Discriminant Analysis Revisited with a Special Emphasis on Visualization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Mark de Rooij
Mark de Rooij*
Affiliation:
Leiden University Institute for Psychological Research
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Mark de Rooij, Methodology and Statistics Unit., Leiden University Institute for Psychological Research, P.O. Box 9555, 2300RB Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ideal point discriminant analysis is a classification tool which uses highly intuitive multidimensional scaling procedures. However, in the last paper, Takane wrote about it. He concludes that the interpretation is rather intricate and calls that a weakness of the model. We summarize the conditions that provide an easy interpretation and show that in maximum dimensionality they can be obtained without any loss. For reduced dimensionality, it is conjectured that loss is minor which is examined using several data sets.

Keywords

classificationEuclidean distance(multinomial) logistic regression
Type
Theory and Methods
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 317 - 330
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 The Author(s)

Footnotes

This research was conducted while the author was sponsored by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), Innovational Grant, no. 452-06-002.

References

Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis, (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rooij, M., Heiser, W.J. (2005). Graphical representations and odds ratios in a distance-association model for the analysis of cross-classified data. Psychometrika, 70, 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, J.C., Hand, D.J. (1996). Biplots, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Heiser, W.J. (1981). Unfolding analysis of proximity data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Irwin, G.A., Van Holsteyn, J.J.M., & Den Ridder, J.M. (2003). Dutch parliamentary election study 2002–2003: An enterprise of the foundation for electoral research in the Netherlands (skon). Steinmetz Archives, Amsterdam (P1628).Google Scholar
Lattin, J., Carroll, J.D., Green, P.E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data, Toronto: Thomson learning: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Mathworks (2006). Matlab: the language of technical computing, Natick: Mathworks.Google Scholar
Tabachnik, B.G. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Takane, Y. (1998). Visualization in ideal point discriminant analysis. In Blasius, J., Greenacre, M.J. (Eds.), Visualization of categorical data (pp. 441–459). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y., Bozdogan, H., Shibayama, T. (1987). Ideal point discriminant analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y., van der Heijden, P., Browne, M. (2003). On likelihood ratio tests for dimensionality selection. In Higuchi, T., Iba, Y., Ishiguro, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of science of modeling: The 30th anniversary meeting of the information criterion (AIC) (pp. 348–349). Tokyo: The Institute of Statistical Mathematics.Google Scholar
Wiepkema, P.R. (1961). An ethological analysis of the reproductive behavior of the bitterling (Rhodeus amarus Bloch). Archives Neerlandais Zoologique, 14, 103–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar