Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:21:53.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fitting a Simplex Symmetrically

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Peter H. Schönemann
Peter H. Schönemann*
Affiliation:
Educational Testing Service
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method for fitting a perfect simplex [Guttman, 1954] is suggested which, in contrast to Kaiser's [1962], is independent of the order of the manifest variables. It is based on a procedure for scaling a set of points from their pairwise distances [Torgerson, 1958; Young & Householder, 1938] which is reviewed in compact notation in the Appendix. The method is extended to an iterative algorithm for fitting a quasi-simplex. Some empirical results are included.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Now at Purdue University. This work was done while the author held a Visiting Research Fellowship at the Educational Testing Service. The gracious hospitality of this institution, as well as its scenic surroundings, are beyond praise. An earlier version of this paper (ETS Research Bulletin RB-68-31) was reviewed by Drs. Karl G. Jöreskog and Bruce Bloxom who contributed to its improvement. For a critical reading of the final draft, I owe thanks to Miss Ming-Mei Wang.

References

Coombs, C. H. A theory of data, 1964, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fleishman, E. A. A factor analysis of intra-task performance on two psychomotor tests. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Eds.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences, 1954, Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L. G. Investigations of the simplex. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. Scaling a simplex. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, J. A least squares fit to a simplex. Paper read at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, New York, September 1961.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, B. N. Derivation of likelihood-ratio tests for Guttman quasi-simplex covariance structures. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozeboom, W. W. Foundations of the theory of prediction, 1966, Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. On the formal differentiation of traces and determinants, 1965, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Psychometric Laboratory.Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Theory and method of scaling, 1958, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Young, G. and Householder, A. S. Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar