Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hxdxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-20T04:27:39.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the Polyserial Correlation Coefficient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Edward J. Bedrick  and
Frederick C. Breslin
Edward J. Bedrick*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico
Frederick C. Breslin
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Edward J. Bedrick, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131. Electronic mail requests should be sent to [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop simple noniterative estimators of the polyserial correlation coefficient. A general relationship between the polyserial correlation and the point polyserial correlation is exploited to give extensions of Pearson's, Brogden's, and Lord's biserial estimators to the multicategory setting. The small sample and asymptotic properties of these estimators are studied in some detail. A comparison with maximum likelihood estimates shows that Lord's polyserial estimator is fairly efficient across three probability models.

Keywords

biserial correlationBrogden's estimatorLord's estimatormaximum likelihood
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 427 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank the referees for suggestions that improved the presentation of the paper.

References

Bedrick, E. J. (1990). On the large sample distributions of modified sample biserial correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 55, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedrick, E. J. (1992). A comparison of modified and generalized sample biserial correlation estimators. Psychometrika, 57, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogden, H. E. (1949). A new coefficient: Application to biserial correlation and to estimation of selective efficiency. Psychometrika, 14, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karelitz, S., Fisichelli, V. R., Costa, J., Karelitz, R., Rosenfeld, L. (1964). Relation of crying activity in early infancy to speech and intellectual development at age three years. Child Development, 35, 769–777.Google ScholarPubMed
Kraemer, H. C. (1981). Modified biserial correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 46, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. K., Poon, W. Y. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation of polyserial correlations. Psychometrika, 51, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1963). Biserial estimates of correlation. Psychometrika, 28, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, U., Drasgow, F., Dorans, N. J. (1982). The polyserial correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 47, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. (1909). On a new method of determining the correlation between a measured character A and a character B. Biometrika, 7, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, R. F. (1955). The theory of correlation between two continuous variables when one is dichotomized. Biometrika, 42, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar