Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T22:42:53.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing Variances of Correlated Variables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Ayala Cohen
Ayala Cohen*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management Technion, Haifa
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Ayala Cohen, Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion, Haifa, ISRAEL 32000.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A test is proposed for the equality of the variances of k ≥ 2 correlated variables. Pitman's test for k = 2 reduces the null hypothesis to zero correlation between their sum and their difference. Its extension, eliminating nuisance parameters by a bootstrap procedure, is valid for any correlation structure between the k normally distributed variables. A Monte Carlo study for several combinations of sample sizes and number of variables is presented, comparing the level and power of the new method with previously published tests. Some nonnormal data are included, for which the empirical level tends to be slightly higher than the nominal one. The results show that our method is close in power to the asymptotic tests which are extremely sensitive to nonnormality, yet it is robust and much more powerful than other robust tests.

Keywords

variancescorrelated variablesbootstrapFisher's z-transformrobustness
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , September 1986 , pp. 379 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the fund for the promotion of research at the Technion.

References

Beran, R. (1986). Simulated power functions. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, R., Srivastava, M. S. (1985). Bootstrap tests and confidence regions for functions of a covariance matrix. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G. E. P. (1953). Nonnormality and tests on variances. Biometrika, 40, 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, S. J., Gnanadesikan, R., Kettenring, J. R. (1981). Robust estimation of dispersion matrices and principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans, Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, C. P. (1968). Testing the homogeneity of a set of correlated variances. Biometrika, 55, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, C. P. (1969). Testing the homogeneity of variances in a two-way classification. Biometrics, 25, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. (1985). Testing for variance homogeneity of correlated variables. Biometrika, 72, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, H. O. (1950). The maximumF-ratio as a short cut test for heterogeneity of variance. Biometrika, 37, 308–312.Google Scholar
Layard, M. W. J. (1974). A Monte Carlo comparison of tests for equality of covariance matrices. Biometrika, 61, 461–465.Google Scholar
Levy, K. J. (1976). A procedure for testing the equality ofp-correlated variances. British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology, 29, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W. A. (1939). A test for the significance of the difference between the two variances in a sample from a normal bivariate population. Biometrika, 31, 13–19.Google Scholar
Pitman, E. J. C. (1939). A note on normal correlation. Biometrika, 31, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffé, H. (1959). The Analysis of Variance, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schenker, N. (1985). Qualms about bootstrap intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 340–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar