Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:11:29.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coefficients Alpha and Reliabilities of Unrotated and Rotated Components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Jos M. F. ten Berge*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Willem K. B. Hofstee
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Jos M.F. ten Berge, Heijmans Institute of Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, THE NETHERLANDS.

Abstract

It has been shown by Kaiser that the sum of coefficients alpha of a set of principal components does not change when the components are transformed by an orthogonal rotation. In this paper, Kaiser's result is generalized. First, the invariance property is shown to hold for any set of orthogonal components. Next, a similar invariance property is derived for the reliability of any set of components. Both generalizations are established by considering simultaneously optimal weights for components with maximum alpha and with maximum reliability, respectively. A short-cut formula is offered to evaluate the coefficients alpha for orthogonally rotated principal components from rotation weights and eigenvalues of the correlation matrix. Finally, the greatest lower bound to reliability and a weighted version are discussed.

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Comments by Henk A.L. Kiers and by anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Barchard, K.A., & Hakstian, R.A. (1997). The robustness of confidence intervals for coefficient alpha under violation of the assumption of essential parallellism. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 169191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P.M. (1968). Alpha-maximized factor analysis (Alphamax): Its relation to alpha and canonical factor analysis. Psychometrika, 33, 335345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentler, P.M., & Woodward, J.A. (1980). Inequalities among lower-bounds to reliability: With applications to test construction and factor analysis. Psychometrika, 45, 249267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliff, N. (1992). Derivations of the reliability of components. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 667670.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. (1988). Internal consistency of tests: Analyses old and new. Psychometrika, 53, 6370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressel, P.L. (1940). Some remarks on the Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient. Psychometrika, 5, 305310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B.F. Jr. (1950). A note on the calculation of weights for maximum battery reliability. Psychometrika, 15, 5761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 225282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, H.F. (1992). On the invariance of the sum of coefficients alpha for factors under orthogonal rotation. Psychological Reports, 70, 545546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H.F., & Caffrey, J. (1965). Alpha factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H. (1997). A unifying expression for the maximal reliability of a composite. Psychometrika, 62, 245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1996). Reliability of measurement in Psychology: From Spearman-Brown to maximal reliability. Psychological Methods, 1, 98107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F.M. (1958). Some relations between Guttman's principal components of scale analysis and other psychometric theory. Psychometrika, 23, 291296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, J.R., & Neudecker, H. (1988). Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Murakami, T. (1987). Hierarchical component analysis of second order composites I. Japanese Journal of Administrative Behavior, 2, 3747.Google Scholar
Novick, M.R., & Lewis, C. (1967). Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory 3rd ed.,, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Peel, E.A. (1948). Prediction of a complex criterion and battery reliability. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 8494.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A. (1982). Weighted minimum trace factor analysis. Psychometrika, 47, 243263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Berge, J.M.F. (1986). Some relationships between descriptive comparisons of components from different studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 2940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ten Berge, J.M.F., Snijders, T.A.B., & Zegers, F.E. (1981). Computational aspects of the greatest lower bound to reliability and constrained minimum trace factor analysis. Psychometrika, 46, 201213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Berge, J.M.F., & Zegers, F.E. (1978). A series of lower bounds to the reliability of a test. Psychometrika, 43, 575579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G.H. (1940). Weighting for maximum battery reliability and prediction. British Journal of Psychology, 30, 357366.Google Scholar
Van Zijl, J.M., Neudecker, H., & Nel, D.G. (1997, July). On the distribution of the estimator of Cronbach's alpha. Paper presented at the 10th European Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, B., & Jackson, P.H. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of a total score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: II. A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound. Psychometrika, 42, 579591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J.A., & Bentler, P.M. (1978). A statistical lower bound to population reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 13231326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed