Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T22:09:54.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Additive and Multiplicative Models for Gamma Distributed Random Variables, and their Application as Psychometric Models for Response Times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Eric Maris
Eric Maris*
Affiliation:
University of Leuven
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Eric Marls, Psychologisch Laboratorium, Universiteit Nijmegen, PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, THE NETHERLANDS.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A class of models for gamma distributed random variables is presented. These models are shown to be more flexible than the classical linear models with respect to the structure that can be imposed on the expected value. In particular, both additive, multiplicative, and combined additive-multiplicative models can be formulated. As a special case, a class of psychometric models for reaction times is presented, together with their psychological interpretation. By means of a comparison with existing models, this class of models is shown to offer some possibilities that are not available in existing methods. Parameter estimation by means of maximum likelihood (ML) is shown to have some attractive properties, since the models belong to the exponential family. Then, the results of a simulation study of the bias in the ML estimates are presented. Finally, the application of these models is illustrated by an analysis of the data from a mental rotation experiment. This analysis is preceded by an evaluation of the appropriateness of the gamma distribution for these data.

Keywords

gamma distributionresponse timespsychometric modelsmental rotation
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 445 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank Paul De Boeck, Ivo Molenaar, Susan Embretson, Gerard van Breuketen, and Gert Storms for their helpful comments, Gerard van Breukelen for the use of his data, and Rob Stroobants for plotting the graphs.

References

Andersen, E. B. (1980). Discrete statistical models with social science applications, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J., & Nelder, J. A. (1978). The GLIM system, Release 3, Generalized linear interactive modeling, Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group.Google Scholar
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. (1978). Information and exponential families in statistical theory, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloxom, B. (1985). Considerations in psychometric modeling of response time. Psychometrika, 50, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbeck, S. L., & Luce, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 117–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chocholle, R. (1940). Variation des temps de reaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité à diverses fréquences [Variation of auditory reaction times as a function of intensity at different frequencies]. L'Annee Psychologique, 41, 65–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In Chase, W. G. (Eds.), Visual information processing (pp. 75–176). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, P. L. (1970). Simple reaction time with Markovian evolution of Gaussian discriminal processes. Psychometrika, 35, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, B. S. (1987). Introduction to optimization methods and their application in statistics, London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graybill, F. A. (1961). An introduction to linear statistical models, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Grice, G. R. (1972). Application of a variable criterion model to auditory reaction time as a function of the type of catch trial. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. L., & Kotz, S. (1969). Discrete distributions, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Lansman, M., Donaldson, G., Hunt, E., & Yantis, S. (1982). Ability factors and cognitive processes. Intelligence, 6, 347–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maccullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1983). Generalized linear models, London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marley, A. A. J. (1981). Multivariate stochastic processes compatible with “aspect” models of similarity and choice. Psychometrika, 46, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGill, W. J., & Gibbon, J. (1965). The general gamma distribution and reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzler, J., & Shepard, R. N. (1974). Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In Solso, R. L. (Eds.), Theories in cognitive psychology (pp. 147–201). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Millsap, R. E., & Meredith, W. (1987). Structure in semantic memory: A probabilistic approach using a continuous response task. Psychometrika, 52, 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., & Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the theory of statistics, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A., & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 135, 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimators based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica, 16, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterloo, S. J. (1975). Modellen voor reaktietijden [Models for reaction times], The Netherlands: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Restle, F. (1961). Psychology of judgment and choice, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Scheiblechner, H. (1979). Specifically objective stochastic latency mechanisms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnizlein, J. M. (1980). Psychophysics of auditory simple reaction time. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A., & Wolvaardt, J. S. (1983). Operations research, Pretoria: University of South Africa.Google Scholar
Shorack, G. R., & Wellner, J. A. (1986). Empirical processes with applications to statistics, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Takane, Y., & Sergent, J. (1983). Multidimensional scaling models for reaction times and same-different judgments. Psychometrika, 48, 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thissen, D. (1983). Timed testing: An approach using item response theory. In Weiss, D. J. (Eds.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 179–203). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Timmers, L., & Claeys, W. (1990). The generality of mental addition models: Simple and complex addition in a decision-production task. Memory & Cognition, 18, 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Breukelen, G. (1989). Concentration, speed and precision in mental tests: A psychonometric approach, The Netherlands: Catholic University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1955). Experimental psychology, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Zinnes, J. L., & Wolff, R. P. (1977). Single and multidimensional same-different judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 16, 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar