Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Holland, Paul W.
1990.
On the Sampling Theory Roundations of Item Response Theory Models.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 4,
p.
577.
Donoghue, John R.
and
Cliff, Norman
1991.
An Investigation of Ordinal True Score Test Theory.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 4,
p.
335.
Luecht, Richard M.
and
Miller, Timothy R.
1992.
Unidimensional Calibrations and Interpretations of Composite Traits for Multidimensional Tests.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
279.
Camilli, Gregory
1992.
A Conceptual Analysis of Differential Item Functioning in Terms of a Multidimensional Item Response Model.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
129.
Cliff, Norman
and
Donoghue, John R.
1992.
Ordinal Test Fidelity Estimated by an Item Sampling Model.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 2,
p.
217.
Chang, Hua-Hua
and
Stout, William
1993.
The Asymptotic Posterior Normality of the Latent Trait in an IRT Model.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Darroch, John N.
Fienberg, Stephen E.
Glonek, Gary F. V.
and
Junker, Brian W.
1993.
A Three-Sample Multiple-Recapture Approach to Census Population Estimation with Heterogeneous Catchability.
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
Vol. 88,
Issue. 423,
p.
1137.
Zhang, Jinming
and
Stout, William
1997.
On Holland's Dutch Identity Conjecture.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 3,
p.
375.
Junker, Brian W.
and
Sijtsma, Klaas
2000.
Latent and Manifest Monotonicity in Item Response Models.
Applied Psychological Measurement,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Junker, Brian
2001.
Essays on Item Response Theory.
Vol. 157,
Issue. ,
p.
247.
Stout, William
2002.
Psychometrics: from Practice to Theory and Back.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 67,
Issue. 4,
p.
485.
Ip, Edward H.
2002.
Locally Dependent Latent Trait Model and the Dutch Identity Revisited.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 67,
Issue. 3,
p.
367.
Sinharay, Sandip
2003.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE MODEL CHECKING FOR ASSESSING FIT OF COMMON ITEM RESPONSE THEORY MODELS.
ETS Research Report Series,
Vol. 2003,
Issue. 2,
Sinharay, Sandip
and
Johnson, Matthew S.
2003.
SIMULATION STUDIES APPLYING POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE MODEL CHECKING FOR ASSESSING FIT OF THE COMMON ITEM RESPONSE THEORY MODELS.
ETS Research Report Series,
Vol. 2003,
Issue. 2,
Maraun, Michael D.
Slaney, Kathleen
and
Goddyn, Louis
2003.
An Analysis of Meehl's MAXCOV-HITMAX Procedure for the Case of Dichotomous Indicators.
Multivariate Behavioral Research,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
81.
Ip, Edward H.
Wang, Yuchung J.
de Boeck, Paul
and
Meulders, Michel
2004.
Locally Dependent Latent Trait Model for Polytomous Responses with Application to Inventory of Hostility.
Psychometrika,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
Haberman, Shelby J.
2005.
LATENT-CLASS ITEM RESPONSE MODELS.
ETS Research Report Series,
Vol. 2005,
Issue. 2,
p.
i.
Holland, Paul W.
2005.
Profiles in Research.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 3,
p.
343.
Maraun, Michael D.
and
Slaney, Kathleen
2005.
An Analysis of Meehl's MAXCOV-HITMAX Procedure for the Case of Continuous Indicators.
Multivariate Behavioral Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 4,
p.
489.
Haberman, Shelby J.
2005.
IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARAMETERS IN ITEM RESPONSE MODELS WITH UNCONSTRAINED ABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS.
ETS Research Report Series,
Vol. 2005,
Issue. 2,
p.
i.