Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:41:29.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stability of expressed emotion in relatives of those with schizophrenia and its relationship with burden of care and perception of patients' social functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1998

MARCIA SCAZUFCA
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London
ELIZABETH KUIPERS
Affiliation:
From the Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London

Abstract

Background. There is evidence that high expressed emotion (EE) in relatives of patients with schizophrenia is associated with higher levels of burden of care, and with worse perception of patients' social functioning. However, it is not clear whether changes in EE levels over time are associated with changes in relatives' burden of care and their perception of patients' social functioning.

Methods. Fifty patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 50 relatives were included in the study soon after patients' admission to hospital. Thirty-six relatives and 31 patients were re-assessed 9 months after patients' discharge. Both assessments included patients' symptomatology and relatives' EE levels, burden of care, and perception of patients' social functioning.

Results. Twenty-three relatives (64%) had the same EE level in both assessments, nine (25%) had changed from high to low EE, and four (11%) from low to high EE. Improvement in burden and perception of patients' social role performance were significantly more accentuated among relatives who changed from high to low EE than among relatives who had a stable EE level. Variables that best predicted changes in EE levels were changes in burden scores and number of hours of contact between patients and relatives at follow-up.

Conclusions. Change in EE is associated with change in circumstances and burden. Findings support the idea that EE is better understood in an integrative model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)