Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:23:53.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening medical patients for distress and depression: does measurement in the clinic prior to the consultation overestimate distress measured at home?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2013

C. H. Hansen
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research, School of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
J. Walker
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK
P. Thekkumpurath
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research, School of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
A. Kleiboer
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research, School of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
C. Beale
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research, School of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
A. Sawhney
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research, School of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
G. Murray
Affiliation:
Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK
M. Sharpe*
Affiliation:
Psychological Medicine Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor M. Sharpe, Psychological Medicine Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Background

Medical patients are often screened for distress in the clinic using a questionnaire such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) while awaiting their consultation. However, might the context of the clinic artificially inflate the distress score? To address this question we aimed to determine whether those who scored high on the HADS in the clinic remained high scorers when reassessed later at home.

Method

We analysed data collected by a distress and depression screening service for cancer out-patients. All patients had completed the HADS in the clinic (on computer or on paper) prior to their consultation. For a period, patients with a high score (total of ⩾15) also completed the HADS again at home (over the telephone) 1 week later. We used these data to determine what proportion remained high scorers and the mean change in their scores. We estimated the effect of ‘regression to the mean’ on the observed change.

Results

Of the 218 high scorers in the clinic, most [158 (72.5%), 95% confidence interval (CI) 66.6–78.4] scored high at reassessment. The mean fall in the HADS total score was 1.74 (95% CI 1.09–2.39), much of which could be attributed to the estimated change over time (regression to the mean) rather than the context.

Conclusions

Pre-consultation distress screening in clinic is widely used. Reassuringly, it only modestly overestimates distress measured later at home and consequently would result in a small proportion of unnecessary further assessments. We conclude it is a reasonable and convenient strategy.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakker, IM, Terluin, B, van Marwijk, HW, van Mechelen, W, Stalman, WA (2009). Test-retest reliability of the PRIME-MD: limitations in diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. European Journal of Public Health 19, 303307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, AG, van der Pols, JC, Dobson, AJ (2005). Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology 34, 215220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, LE, Waller, A, Mitchell, AJ (2012). Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Oncology 30, 11601177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, YB, Goh, C, Thumboo, J, Khoo, KS, Wee, J (2006). Quality of life scores differed according to mode of administration in a review of three major oncology questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59, 185191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosco, TD, Doyle, F, Ward, M, McGee, H (2012). Latent structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a 10-year systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 72, 180184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, P, Mulder, PGH (1983). Regression to the mode. Statistica Neerlandica 37, 1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW (1999). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York.Google Scholar
Gerin, W, Ogedegbe, G, Schwartz, JE, Chaplin, WF, Goyal, T, Clemow, L, Davidson, KW, Burg, M, Lipsky, S, Kentor, R, Jhalani, J, Shimbo, D, Pickering, TG (2006). Assessment of the white-coat effect. Journal of Hypertension 24, 6774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, J (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research 18, 115123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinnen, C, Ranchor, AV, Sanderman, R, Snijders, TA, Hagedoorn, M, Coyne, JC (2008). Course of distress in breast cancer patients, their partners, and matched control couples. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 36, 141148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hjermstad, MJ, Fossa, SD, Bjordal, K, Kaasa, S (1995). Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Oncology 13, 12491254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moussavi, S, Chatterji, S, Verdes, E, Tandon, A, Patel, V, Ustun, B (2007). Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet 370, 851858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICE (2009). Depression in Adults with a Chronic Physical Health Problem: Treatment and Management. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: London.Google Scholar
Pignone, MP, Gaynes, BN, Rushton, JL, Burchell, CM, Orleans, CT, Mulrow, CD, Lohr, KN (2002). Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine 136, 765776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto-Meza, A, Serrano-Blanco, A, Penarrubia, MT, Blanco, E, Haro, JM (2005). Assessing depression in primary care with the PHQ-9: can it be carried out over the telephone? Journal of General Internal Medicine 20, 738742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
USPSTF (2009). Screening for depression in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151, 784792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dooren, S, Seynaeve, C, Rijnsburger, AJ, Duivenvoorden, HJ, Essink-Bot, ML, Tilanus-Linthorst, MM, Klijn, JG, de Koning, HJ, Tibben, A (2005). Exploring the course of psychological distress around two successive control visits in women at hereditary risk of breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer 41, 14161425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dulmen, AM, Fennis, JF, Mokkink, HG, van der Velden, HG, Bleijenberg, G (1995). Doctor-dependent changes in complaint-related cognitions and anxiety during medical consultations in functional abdominal complaints. Psychological Medicine 25, 10111018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vodermaier, A, Linden, W, Siu, C (2009). Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101, 14641488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, J, Postma, K, McHugh, GS, Rush, R, Coyle, B, Strong, V, Sharpe, M (2007). Performance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool for major depressive disorder in cancer patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 63, 8391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zigmond, AS, Snaith, RP (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67, 361370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed