Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:46:40.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening for cognitive impairment in older African-Caribbeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2000

G. RAIT
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, School of Primary Care and Department of Public Health, University of Manchester and Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester
M. MORLEY
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, School of Primary Care and Department of Public Health, University of Manchester and Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester
A. BURNS
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, School of Primary Care and Department of Public Health, University of Manchester and Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester
R. BALDWIN
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, School of Primary Care and Department of Public Health, University of Manchester and Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester
C. CHEW-GRAHAM
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, School of Primary Care and Department of Public Health, University of Manchester and Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester
A. S. St LEGER
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, School of Primary Care and Department of Public Health, University of Manchester and Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester

Abstract

Background. There are increasing numbers of older African-Caribbeans in the United Kingdom. Screening instruments are commonly used in the detection of cognitive impairment, but have not been assessed within this population. This study aimed to develop culturally modified versions of screening instruments for cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT)) and to determine their sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of dementia.

Methods. The instruments were modified using a process involving a community group of African-Caribbeans and an academic group of health professionals. They were used in a two-stage study involving community resident African-Caribbeans aged 60 years or over in inner-city Manchester, comparing the screening instruments against a computerized diagnostic interview.

Results. One hundred and thirty people completed the study. The results for the largest subgroup, the Jamaicans (N = 96) were analysed. Effects of gender, age and education on the MMSE and AMT scores were evaluated. The correlations between the screening instruments and diagnostic interview were highly significant (P < 0·001). At appropriate cut-offs both screening instruments demonstrated high sensitivity and acceptable specificity levels.

Conclusions. A defined process with lay input has assisted in producing culturally modified versions of the MMSE and AMT that perform well compared with a diagnostic interview, if an appropriate cut-off is used. They are easy to administer and acceptable to older African-Caribbean people. The results need to be viewed within the limitations of the current study.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)