Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:22:34.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Saving clinicians' time by delegating routine aspects of therapy to a computer: a randomized controlled trial in phobia/panic disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2004

I. M. MARKS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley Trust, London
M. KENWRIGHT
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley Trust, London
M. McDONOUGH
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley Trust, London
M. WHITTAKER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley Trust, London
D. MATAIX-COLS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London and South London and Maudsley Trust, London

Abstract

Background. The demand for time-consuming psychotherapy of phobia/panic exceeds the supply of trained therapists. Delegating routine therapy aspects to a computer might ease this problem.

Method. Ninety-three out-patients with phobia or panic disorder were randomized in a 2[ratio ]2[ratio ]1 ratio to have self-exposure therapy guided either mainly by a stand-alone computer system (FearFighter) or entirely face-to-face by a clinician, or to have mainly computer-guided self-relaxation as a placebo. Both computer groups (FearFighter and relaxation) had brief back-up advice from a clinician. Primary outcome measures were self- and blind-assessor ratings of Main Problem and Goals, and Global Phobia.

Results. Drop-outs occurred significantly more often in the two self-exposure groups (43% if mainly computer-guided, 24% if entirely clinician-guided) than with self-relaxation (6%); the difference between the two self-exposure groups was not significant. Even with all drop-outs included, the mainly computer-guided exposure group and the relaxation group had 73% less clinician time per patient than did the entirely clinician-guided exposure group. The two self-exposure groups had comparable improvement and satisfaction at post-treatment and at 1-month follow-up, while relaxation was ineffective. Mean improvement on the primary outcome measures (self- and assessor-rated) was 46% computer, 49% clinician, 9% relaxation at post-treatment (week 10) and 58% computer, 53% clinician and −4% relaxation at 1-month follow-up (week 14). Mean effect sizes on the primary outcome measures were 2·9 computer, 3·5 clinician and 0·5 relaxation at post-treatment; and 3·7 computer, 3·5 clinician and 0·5 relaxation at 1-month follow-up. The assessor did not rate patients at follow-up.

Conclusions. Despite its (non-significantly) higher dropout rate, self-exposure therapy for panic/phobia cut clinician time per patient by 73% without losing efficacy when guided mainly by a computer rather than entirely by a clinician. The finding needs confirmation at a follow-up that is longer and includes a blind assessor. Self-relaxation had the highest rate of completers but was ineffective.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Supplementary material: File

Addendum to Marks et al.

Marks Addendum

Download Addendum to Marks et al.(File)
File 19.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Marks et al. Appendix

Marks Appendix

Download Marks et al. Appendix(PDF)
PDF 3.1 KB