Introduction
Childhood trauma (CT) has been found to be causally related to an increased risk of a wide range of psychiatric disorders (Grilo & Masheb, Reference Grilo and Masheb2002; Kendler et al., Reference Kendler, Bulik, Silberg, Hettema, Myers and Prescott2000; Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Heath, Madden, Cooper, Dinwiddie, Bucholz and Martin2002). The prevalence of CT among adults with psychotic disorders greatly exceeds that of the general population (Read, van Os, Morrison, & Ross, Reference Read, van Os, Morrison and Ross2005). Overall lifetime exposure to sexual or physical abuse ranges from 12% to 85% across studies depending on the characteristics of study populations and definition of abuse (Bendall, Jackson, Hulbert, & McGorry, Reference Bendall, Jackson, Hulbert and McGorry2008; Kilicaslan et al., Reference Kilicaslan, Esen, Kasal, Ozelci, Boysan and Gulec2017; Üçok & Bıkmaz, Reference Üçok and Bıkmaz2007).
Positive psychotic symptoms have been particularly related to CT in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) (Ross, Anderson, & Clark, Reference Ross, Anderson and Clark1994; Üçok & Bıkmaz, Reference Üçok and Bıkmaz2007). Although some studies reported an association of negative symptoms with childhood abuse and neglect (Uyan, Baltacioglu, & Hocaoglu, Reference Uyan, Baltacioglu and Hocaoglu2022; Van Dam et al., Reference Van Dam, van Nierop, Viechtbauer, Velthorst, van Winkel and Risk2015; Vila-Badia et al., Reference Vila-Badia, Del Cacho, Butjosa, Arumí, Santjusto, Abella and Usall2022), others found no relationship in patients with psychosis (Şahin et al., Reference Şahin, Yüksel, Güler, Karadayı, Akturan, Göde and Üçok2013; Üçok & Bıkmaz, Reference Üçok and Bıkmaz2007; Werbeloff et al., Reference Werbeloff, Hilge Thygesen, Hayes, Viding, Johnson and Osborn2021). Although little is known about the relationship between specific types of trauma and specific symptoms, there is some evidence that type of trauma is related to type of psychotic symptoms. For example, emotional abuse was reported as related to auditory hallucinations and delusions of thought reading in first-episode schizophrenia (Üçok & Bıkmaz, Reference Üçok and Bıkmaz2007); and sexual abuse was found related to more severe Schneiderian symptoms, particularly with ‘commenting voices’ in individuals with high risk for psychosis (Şahin et al., Reference Şahin, Yüksel, Güler, Karadayı, Akturan, Göde and Üçok2013). In a recent meta-analysis, it has been reported that while three types of childhood abuse were associated with positive symptoms, there is also a weak association between physical and emotional abuse and negative dimension as well as emotional and physical neglect and negative dimension (Alameda et al., Reference Alameda, Christy, Rodriguez, Salazar de Pablo, Thrush, Shen and Murray2021).
Studies investigating CT histories in patients with SCZ and their siblings report more CT in patients compared to siblings (Barrigón et al., Reference Barrigón, Diaz, Gurpegui, Ferrin, Salcedo, Moreno-Granados and Ruiz-Veguilla2015; Heins et al., Reference Heins, Simons, Lataster, Pfeifer, Versmissen and Lardinois2011). In a recent meta-analysis, it has been reported that all kinds of childhood abuse and neglect were related to three subtypes of schizotypy, and strongest relationship was found between emotional abuse and schizotypal symptoms in non-clinical populations (Toutountzidis, Gale, Irvine, Sharma, & Laws, Reference Toutountzidis, Gale, Irvine, Sharma and Laws2022).
Despite the population attribution risk from exposure to CT has been reported as 33% (Varese et al., Reference Varese, Smeets, Drukker, Lieverse, Lataster, Viechtbauer and Bentall2012), it is not clear why some individuals with history of CT develop psychotic symptoms or a disorder and others do not. Therefore it is relevant to examine mediating factors in relationship between trauma and psychotic symptoms. Negative cognitive schemas about the self and others are proposed as one of the potential pathways from trauma to psychotic symptoms. Cognitive schemas can be described as broad, self-perpetuating, maladaptive styles of thinking that originate from repetitive relational experiences, and unmet psychological needs with significant others in childhood and adolescence (Young, Klosko, & Weishaar, Reference Young, Klosko and Weishaar2003). In adulthood, they become ‘trait-like’ due to the presence of strong emotions and evolve into component parts of the self and others. Once formed, these structures are the lenses by which we view the world (Rafaeli, Bernstein, & Young, Reference Rafaeli, Bernstein and Young2010). They may be involved in the evolution of psychotic experiences, for example, by influencing the content of hallucinations and/or delusional beliefs.
The negative cognitive schemas of self and others have been observed in people with psychosis (Alameda et al., Reference Alameda, Christy, Rodriguez, Salazar de Pablo, Thrush, Shen and Murray2021; Sundag, Ascone, de Matos Marques, Moritz, & Lincoln, Reference Sundag, Ascone, de Matos Marques, Moritz and Lincoln2016; Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Stewart, Dunn, Parker, Fowler and Morrison2014). CT are also one of the contributing factors to negative evaluations of self and others, and were found related to negative schemas in patients with psychosis (Cui et al., Reference Cui, Piao, Kim, Lee, Kim, Yu and Chung2020; Van Dam et al., Reference Van Dam, van Nierop, Viechtbauer, Velthorst, van Winkel and Risk2015) their siblings, and healthy people (Boyda, McFeeters, Dhingra, & Rhoden, Reference Boyda, McFeeters, Dhingra and Rhoden2018; Fisher, Appiah-Kusi, & Grant, Reference Fisher, Appiah-Kusi and Grant2012; Jaya, Ascone, & Lincoln, Reference Jaya, Ascone and Lincoln2018; Sellers, Emsley, Wells, & Morrison, Reference Sellers, Emsley, Wells and Morrison2018). In a recent meta-analysis (Alameda et al., Reference Alameda, Rodriguez, Carr, Aas, Trotta, Marino and Murray2020), it has been reported that there is solid evidence of mediation between childhood abuse and psychosis by negative cognitive schemas about the self, the world, and others both in studies conducted in clinical samples and in the general population. To the best of our knowledge, only Hardy et al. (Reference Hardy, Emsley, Freeman, Bebbington, Garety, Kuipers and Fowler2016) reported about the mediating role of cognitive schemas in relationship between specific CT and specific positive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. They found that the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and persecutory delusions was mediated by negative cognitive schemas about others.
We aimed to compare the history of subtypes of abuse and neglect and to analyze the relationship between history of trauma and specific positive symptoms in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia, their siblings and healthy controls. We also examined the relationship between cognitive schemas about self, and others and psychotic symptoms. We hypothesized that the childhood trauma would be more common both in patient and sibling groups compared to controls. We also expected that negative cognitive schemas were more common, and would mediate the relationship between childhood trauma and psychotic symptoms in patients.
Methods
Study sample
The study population consisted of 742 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders according to the DSM-IV-TR (average duration of illness since age of first contact with mental health services = 9.9 years), 718 of their unaffected siblings, and 1039 controls from the general non-clinical population, who enrolled in the Work-package 6 (WP6) of the European Network of National Schizophrenia Networks Studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) (European Network of National Networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia (EU-GEI), 2014; Guloksuz et al., Reference Guloksuz, Pries, Delespaul, Kenis, Luykx, Lin and van Os2019; van Os et al., Reference van Os, Pries, Delespaul, Kenis, Luykx, Lin and Guloksuz2020) from September 2010 to September 2014 in Turkey. The diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder was later confirmed by the Operational Criteria Checklist for Psychotic and Affective Illness (OPCRIT) (McGuffin, Farmer, & Harvey, Reference McGuffin, Farmer and Harvey1991). Unrelated controls with no lifetime psychotic disorder were recruited from the same population as the cases. Sibling group was stipulated to include all consenting unaffected siblings, without stratification for socioeconomic variables. Additional exclusion criteria for the siblings were having a previous diagnosis of any psychotic disorder or previous use of antipsychotic medication for any reason. Sibling with an age difference of >5 years with the patients were also excluded. The exclusion criteria for all participants included a diagnosis of psychotic disorder due to another medical condition, a history of head injury with loss of consciousness, and intelligence quotient <70.
All interviews were conducted by a research team, who received specific training for the use of standardized assessments. The complete details of the entire study and procedures were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey (approval #07-302-15).
Measures
All the measures were applied to all groups, except for the Structured Interview for Schizotypy–Revised (SIS-R) (Vollema & Ormel, Reference Vollema and Ormel2000), which was given only to siblings and healthy controls, and OPCRIT (McGuffin et al., Reference McGuffin, Farmer and Harvey1991) which was applied only to patients.
Childhood adversity was evaluated using the Short Form of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) (Bernstein et al., Reference Bernstein, Stein, Newcomb, Walker, Pogge, Ahluvalia and Zule2003) which measures childhood emotional, physical and sexual abuse, and physical and emotional neglect. The scale also demonstrated a good test–retest reliability over 2–6 months (intra-class correlation 0.88) (Bernstein et al., Reference Bernstein, Fink, Handelsman, Foote, Lovejoy, Wenzel and Ruggiero1994). The participants were asked to respond by considering their experiences of abuse and neglect before age 18. We calculated five subscale scores for different kinds of CT. We used the predefined cut-off scores to dichotomize each group for each kind of abuse/neglect which was used in the study that evaluated the validity and reliability of the Turkish version (Şar, Öztürk, & İkikardeş, Reference Şar, Öztürk and İkikardeş2012) and then compared to frequency of each abuse/neglect type among three groups. We also analyzed dose–response relationships by using mean scores of CTQ subscales. The cut-off was set at >7 for emotional abuse, >5 for physical and sexual abuse, >12 for emotional neglect, and >7 for physical neglect.
Severity of positive and negative symptoms of the patients was evaluated by the OPCRIT (McGuffin et al., Reference McGuffin, Farmer and Harvey1991). OPCRIT evaluates both severity and frequency of symptoms. We analyzed only severity scores in this study. Items are scored on a 6-point scale, rating severity of the experience from ‘absent’ to ‘severe’. Clinical assessment of subclinical psychotic symptoms and negative symptoms was completed in the siblings and healthy controls with the SIS-R, a semi-structured interview originally developed by Kendler, Lieberman, and Walsh (Reference Kendler, Lieberman and Walsh1989), and revised by Vollema and Ormel (Reference Vollema and Ormel2000). SIS-R consists of 20 schizotypal symptoms (like introversion, magical thinking, restricted affect, dysfunction in leisure time activities, and referential thinking) and 11 schizotypal signs (like flatness of affect, oddness, rapport, and amount of speech). Positive schizotypy covers symptoms like referential thinking, illusions, and suspiciousness (in total six items). Negative schizotypy contains the symptoms like social isolation, social anxiety, introversion, and restricted affect (in total eight items). Each item was scored on a four-point scale. We calculated SIS-R total score, SIS-R positive, and SIS-R negative symptom scores.
We used The Brief Core Schema Scale (BCSS) (Fowler et al., Reference Fowler, Freeman, Smith, Kuipers, Bebbington, Bashforth and Garety2006) which was developed to provide a theoretically coherent self-report assessment of schemata concerning self and others in psychosis. The BCSS have 24 items concerning beliefs about the self and others that are assessed on a five-point rating scale. The scales assess four dimensions of self and other evaluation: negative-self, positive-self, negative-other, and positive-other. There are six items to assess each domain.
Statistical analyses
The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (for all, p > 0.05). In cases where the normality assumption was rejected by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, an approximately normal distribution was considered based on the following criteria: (1) Skewness and kurtosis values within the range of ±2 (George, Reference George2011; Tabachnick, Fidell, & Ullman, Reference Tabachnick, Fidell and Ullman2013). (2) Confirmation through visual inspection resembling a bell-shaped curve (Tabachnick et al., Reference Tabachnick, Fidell and Ullman2013).
For datasets of the variables that did not meet the normality criteria, a data transformation process, including the logarithmic (lg) function with a base of 10 (due to positively skewed data), was applied. Thus, the mean scores of CTQ subscales for emotional, physical, and sexual abuse were transformed. Additionally, the scores for SIS-R positive, negative, and total subtests, along with the negative-self score of the BCSS, which were included in the correlation analyses within the sibling and control groups, as well as in group comparisons, underwent the same transformation process. However, as this non-negative data included zero values, the lg10 transformation was applied with an adjustment for zero values.
After the transformations, an approximately normal distribution was achieved for all scores, except for the CTQ abuse scores of siblings and controls. Since the CTQ abuse scores of patients did not display excessive skewness and/or kurtosis; an approximately normal distribution was achieved after transforming the CTQ abuse scores in patients.
The differences in frequency distributions for each type of CT history among the three groups were examined using a Pearson chi-square (χ2) test. An independent samples t or F test (or Robust-Brown Forsythe (RBF) test for asymptotically F distributed) was employed to analyze continuous variables with a normal distribution. Additional multiple comparisons of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted with the Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) or Tamhane's T2 tests, based on the assumption of whether the variances are homogeneously distributed or not. While, in datasets where the transformation process did not yield an approximately normal distribution (due to the CTQ abuse subscores of siblings and controls), a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for the group comparisons. We aimed to compare the mean scores of CTQ subscales among study groups using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test. Furthermore, we conducted cross-sectional group comparisons by the CT status (or the history of CT type) using the independent samples t test. The OPCRIT subscores were compared for the SCZ group, while the SIS-R subscale scores were compared for the siblings and controls. A Pearson correlation analysis was utilized to examine the associations between CT and cognitive schema scores. Finally, we conducted a mediation analysis to examine whether the association between childhood emotional abuse and overall positive symptom severity (including OPCRIT subscores of total positive symptoms, persecutory delusions, thought withdrawal, thought broadcasting, and thought echo) was mediated by the negative cognitive schema about self in the SCZ group. Additionally, we performed the same mediation analysis to test our hypothesis regarding the association between the subscore of CTQ sexual abuse and persecutory delusions, mediated by the negative cognitive schema about self.
To establish mediation, four steps were tested as follows: (1) intervention is related to the outcome (direct effect), (2) intervention is related to the mediator, (3) the mediator is related to the outcome when it is controlled for intervention, and (4) when the analysis is controlled for the mediator there is no direct effect (for full mediation) or a weaker direct effect (for partial mediation) of the intervention on the outcome. The mediation analyses were performed by the PROCESS macro for SPSS (Hayes & Rockwood, Reference Hayes and Rockwood2017), which estimated a 95% percentile bootstrap confidence interval (CI) for indirect effects based on 5000 bootstrap samples. Also, a proportion of variance explained by the mediator was calculated by dividing the total indirect effect by the total effect. Additional assumptions of linearity of regression slopes among variables proposed in the models and multicollinearity were tested and provided before the mediation analysis.
A p-value <0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant. However, to reduce the increased risk of a type I error in multiple testing (Armstrong, Reference Armstrong2014), Bonferroni-corrected/adjusted p-values have been applied in the analyses of post hoc tests (involving multiple comparisons) and multiple correlations (Mørkved et al., Reference Mørkved, Johnsen, Kroken, Gjestad, Winje, Thimm and Løberg2020). Thus, in the case of multiple comparisons, a two-tailed p-value of <0.02, and for multiple correlations, a p-value of ⩽0.001 were considered to be significant.
Additionally, a clinical significance was estimated by computing an effect size (ES) statistic by Cohen' (ηp 2) (for analyzing variance) in the tests based on group comparisons. For correlations, a power value (PV) was estimated by computing an R-squared (R 2) and presented with the relation size (RS) as an indicator of the ES. The thresholds for clinical significance were set at ES > 1 and RS ⩾ 0.10 and were interpreted regarding Cohen's d statistics (Cohen, Reference Cohen1988) (For more details, refer to the notes in the related tables).
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 was used for analysis.
Results
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1.
Abbreviations as follows: SCZ, patients with schizophrenia; SIB, siblings; HC, healthy controls; SD, standard deviation; RBF, Robust-Brown Forsythe (for asymptotically F distributed); BCSS, Brief Core Schema Scales; SIS-R, Structured Interview for Schizotypy-Revised; Lg, logarithm function for transformation; CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; OPCRIT, Operational Checklist for Psychotic Illness; N/A, not applicable.
Comparison of childhood trauma types among study groups
Patients with schizophrenia had higher scores in all subscales of CTQ than both their siblings and controls (for all, p corrrected < 0.001). The siblings had higher scores of emotional abuse (EA) (p corrected < 0.001), physical abuse (PA) (p corrected = 0.037), sexual abuse (SA) (p corrected = 0.015), and emotional neglect (EN) (p corrected = 0.003) subscales than controls (Table 2).
Notes. The η p2 value indicates partial eta-squared used to estimate the effect size (ES). The percentage of partial η2 is used to estimate the amount of explained variance. Partial η2 values, herein used exclusively for parametric datasets, have been interpreted in accordance with the thresholds of Cohen's d statistics (1988). Following that: d: 0.2 to partial η 2: 0.01 or 1% represents a small effect; d: 0.5 to partial η 2: 0.06 or 6% represents a moderate effect; d: 0.8 to partial η 2: 0.14 or 14% represents a large effect size. The significant p corrected and ES values are shown in bold.
Abbreviations as follows: SCZ, patients with schizophrenia; SIB, siblings; HC, healthy controls; MR; mean rank, SD, standard deviation; RBF, Robust-Brown Forsythe (for asymptotically F distributed); CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; NP, non-parametric **0.001 ⩽ p < 0.01.
Relationship between clinical symptoms and childhood trauma
OPCRIT total score for positive symptoms was higher in those with physical (t (331) = −4.098, p < 0.001, ES > 1), sexual (t (336) = −2.389, p = 0.017, ES > 1), and emotional abuse (t (334) = −4.174, p < 0.001, ES > 1) in patients. While physical and emotional abuse had a medium effect on the positive symptoms, sexual abuse had a small effect. There was no difference between those with and without CT in terms of OPCRIT-negative symptom score (Table 3).
Notes. Effect size (ES) statistics have been estimated using the Cohen's d statistic together with the lower and upper values of 95% confidence interval (CI). Cohen's d thresholds follow that: d: 0.2 represents a small effect; d: 0.5 represents a medium effect; d: 0.8 represents a large effect size (Cohen, Reference Cohen1988). The significant p and ES values are shown in bold. Abbreviations as follows: SCZ, patients with schizophrenia; SIB, siblings; HC, healthy controls; SD, standard deviation; ES, effect size; CI, confidence interval, OPCRIT, Operational Checklist for Psychotic Illness; SIS-R, Structured Interview for Schizotypy-Revised; CTQ, childhood trauma questionnaire; PA, physical abuse; SA, sexual abuse; EA, emotional abuse; PN, physical neglect; EN, emotional neglect; Lg, logarithm function for transformation.
Both SIS-R positive subscale and SIS-R negative subscale scores were higher in those with all kinds (except for sexual abuse in SIS-R negative subscore) of childhood abuse and neglect in siblings. In controls, both SIS-R positive and negative subscale scores were higher in those with emotional abuse. SIS-R negative scores were higher in those with emotional and physical neglect, as well as physical and sexual abuse (Table 3). Also, the SIS-R total score (lg mean: 0.06 v. 0.08) was higher in those with sexual abuse in controls (t (1003) = −2.164, p = 0.031, Cohen's d = −0.21 with a small ES).
Relationship between childhood trauma, cognitive schemas, and psychotic symptoms
We found that scores of all kinds of abuse and neglect were positively correlated with the negative-self score and negatively correlated with the positive-self score of the BCSS in patients. Additionally, both emotional abuse and emotional neglect, were found correlated with the negative-other scores in patients (considering both corrected and uncorrected p-values). All kinds of abuse/neglect were correlated with negative- self-scores in siblings. Physical and emotional abuse were also related to negative- other scores in siblings (considering both corrected and uncorrected p-values). In controls, emotional and physical abuse scores were correlated to negative-self score (p corrected < 0.001; p uncorr. = 0.038, respectively) (Table 4).
Notes. The values obtained through the logarithmic transformation of CTQ abuse subscale scores were used in the analyses across all groups. Furthermore, in correlation analyses conducted in the sibling and control groups (but not in the patient group), the lg 10 transformation value of the BCSS negative-self score was employed. Apart from these, all other variables were included in correlation analyses using their raw values. The percentage of partial R 2 values has been shown for only significant relationships between CTQ and BCSS subscores, and that indicates amount of explained variance by the related correlation. These significant correlations presented with the power/R 2 values are shown in bold. Abbreviations as follows: SCZ, patients with schizophrenia; SIB, siblings; HC, healthy controls; BCSS, Brief Core Schema Scales; CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; PA, physical abuse; SA, sexual abuse; EA, emotional abuse; PN, physical neglect; EN, emotional neglect; Lg, logarithm function for transformation; N/A, not applicable. *p < 0.05, **0.001 ⩽ p < 0.01. Bold values represent adjusted/corrected p values.
Cognitive schemas as a mediator between childhood trauma and positive symptoms in schizophrenia
We tested the hypothesis that the association between CT and positive symptoms was mediated by cognitive schemas in the patient group.
First, we analyzed whether the relationship between the subscore of CTQ-emotional abuse and the OPCRIT-total positive symptoms was mediated by the negative cognitive schema about self. The results showed a significant indirect effect of negative self-score on the association between the CTQ-emotional abuse and positive symptoms (B = 2.704, BootSE = 1.036, 95% CI 0.797–4.835). Additionally, a weaker but still significant direct effect from the CTQ-emotional abuse subscores to positive symptoms was observed after controlling for the negative-self score of the BCSS (B = 5.255, BootSE = 2.245 95% CI 0.839–9.672, p = 0.02). These results suggest a partial mediation (Fig. 1a). Approximately 33.9% of the variance in the OPCRIT-positive symptoms was explained by the mediator.
We did not find a significant indirect effect of the negative cognitive schema about self in the correlation of the CTQ-emotional abuse and severity of persecutory delusions (B = 0.141, BootSE = 0.072, 95% CI −0.003 to 0.284). (Fig. 1b).
We tested whether the association between the emotional abuse scores and the severity of thought withdrawal symptoms was mediated by the negative cognitive schema about self. The results indicated that the indirect effect was significant on the model (B = 0.262, BootSE = 0.081, 95% CI 0.118–0.433) while the CTQ-emotional abuse was not a significant predictor after controlling for negative-self score of the BCSS (B = 0.239, BootSE = 0.17, 95% CI −0.096 to 0.573, p = 0.162). These results indicate a full mediation (Fig. 1c). Approximately 52.2% of the variance in the severity of thought withdrawal symptoms was accounted for by the mediator.
We examined whether the association between the CTQ-emotional abuse subscores and severity of thought broadcasting symptoms was mediated by the negative-self score. As a result, the total indirect effect was significant (B = 0.216, BootSE = 0.094, 95% CI 0.042–0.409), but there was no significant direct effect from CTQ-emotional abuse subscore to the severity of thought broadcasting symptoms when the negative-self score of the BCSS was controlled (B = 0.359, BootSE = 0.206, 95% CI −0.047 to 0.765, p = 0.083). These results support the full mediation effect (Fig. 1d). Approximately 37.5% of the variance in the severity of thought broadcasting symptoms was explained by the mediator.
We found that the negative-self score of the BCSS did not mediate the correlation between emotional abuse and the severity of thought echo symptoms (B = 0.15, BootSE = 0.093, 95% CI −0.027 to 0.339) (Fig. 1e).
Finally, we performed a similar analysis using the CTQ-sexual abuse subscores as the independent variable, when persecutory delusions entered as the outcome variable. As a result, the total indirect effect was significant (B = 0.107, BootSE = 0.049, 95% CI 0.025–0.217), and there was a weaker but still significant direct effect from the CTQ-sexual abuse subscores to the persecutory delusions in the overall model (B = 0.508, BootSE = 0.212, 95% CI 0.091–0.926, p = 0.017). These results indicate that the association between the CTQ-sexual abuse subscore and the severity of persecutory delusions was partially mediated by the negative-self score of the BCSS (Fig. 1f). The mediator (negative-self score) accounted for approximately 17.3% of the variance in the severity of persecutory delusions.
Discussion
In this study, we analyzed the frequency and severity of CT, and its relationship with clinical and cognitive variables in patients with SCZ spectrum disorder, their siblings, and controls. We found that all forms of CT are more common in SCZ compared to their siblings and controls. Emotional abuse and neglect were more frequent in siblings than in controls. We also found that all kinds of childhood trauma were related to negative cognitive schemas about self in SCZ and sibling groups.
In some of the previous studies, CT has been analyzed using two main subgroups, abuse and neglect (Grindey & Bradshaw, Reference Grindey and Bradshaw2022; Sideli et al., Reference Sideli, Schimmenti, La Barbera, La Cascia, Ferraro, Aas and Murray2022). However, it has been reported that different kinds of childhood adverse events had different influences on the hypothalamic pituitary sdrenal (HPA) axis (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Nasa, Cullinane, Raajakesary, Gazzaz, Sooknarine and Roddy2022). Additionally, some studies reported that individual CT domains, abuse and neglect, have different impact on clinical symptoms (Carr, Martins, Stingel, Lemgruber, & Juruena, Reference Carr, Martins, Stingel, Lemgruber and Juruena2013; Üçok & Bıkmaz, Reference Üçok and Bıkmaz2007; Üçok et al., Reference Üçok, Kaya, Uğurpala, Çıkrıkçılı, Ergül, Yokuşoğlu and Direk2015; Van Dam et al., Reference Van Dam, van Nierop, Viechtbauer, Velthorst, van Winkel and Risk2015), we analyzed each type of abuse or neglect separately. We analyzed the relationship of CT with clinical variables in terms of a dose–response relationship and binary mode (absent/present) of individual subtypes.
Rates of childhood abuse/neglect in this study were in the range of previous reports (Bendall et al., Reference Bendall, Jackson, Hulbert and McGorry2008; Sideli et al., Reference Sideli, Schimmenti, La Barbera, La Cascia, Ferraro, Aas and Murray2022; Üçok & Bıkmaz, Reference Üçok and Bıkmaz2007), although closer to the higher end. Particularly, the rate of neglect was higher than childhood abuse. However, a recent study from Turkey (Kilicaslan et al., Reference Kilicaslan, Esen, Kasal, Ozelci, Boysan and Gulec2017) reported an even higher rate of EN (58.5%) than ours (55.2%). As the reliability of retrospective self-reports of CT was reported before (Fisher et al., Reference Fisher, Craig, Fearon, Morgan, Dazzan, Lappin and Morgan2011), it is unlikely that our reported rates might be subject to recall bias. The SCZ group reported significantly higher rates of trauma than siblings. Per protocol, our study enrolled siblings with an age difference of maximum five years. It seems that the sibling who developed schizophrenia later was subject to more CT than other siblings who were exposed to the same household conditions during almost the same time period. On the other hand, since siblings reported higher rates of CT compared to controls, we can speculate that CT are more common in families with a member diagnosed with psychosis.
In line with the findings of previous studies (Carr et al., Reference Carr, Martins, Stingel, Lemgruber and Juruena2013; Ross et al., Reference Ross, Anderson and Clark1994; Şahin et al., Reference Şahin, Yüksel, Güler, Karadayı, Akturan, Göde and Üçok2013; Thonney, Conus, & Golay, Reference Thonney, Conus and Golay2021; Üçok & Bıkmaz, Reference Üçok and Bıkmaz2007; Werbeloff et al., Reference Werbeloff, Hilge Thygesen, Hayes, Viding, Johnson and Osborn2021), we found a dose–response relationship between all domains of childhood abuse and positive but not negative symptoms in SCZ. However, in a recent meta-analysis, Alameda et al. (Reference Alameda, Christy, Rodriguez, Salazar de Pablo, Thrush, Shen and Murray2021) reported a weak association between emotional and physical abuse and neglect, and negative dimensions. One of the possible explanations for the difference between our study and this meta-analysis might be the larger sample size of the meta-analysis (n = 6053 for negative dimensions). It has been reported that toxic stress from CT may result in sympathetic arousal through sustained allostatic load along the interconnections of the HPA axis (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Nasa, Cullinane, Raajakesary, Gazzaz, Sooknarine and Roddy2022). Such connections include limbic structures involved in memory, behavior, and emotion. Besides changes in response to external stimuli because of hyperactivation of the HPA axis, other factors like negative cognitive schemas toward others may be responsible for the development of positive symptoms. On the other hand, the relationship between CT and both positive and negative symptoms is stronger in siblings and controls. Our findings are consistent with prior studies (Heins et al., Reference Heins, Simons, Lataster, Pfeifer, Versmissen and Lardinois2011; Toutountzidis et al., Reference Toutountzidis, Gale, Irvine, Sharma and Laws2022; Uyan et al., Reference Uyan, Baltacioglu and Hocaoglu2022; Van Dam et al., Reference Van Dam, van Nierop, Viechtbauer, Velthorst, van Winkel and Risk2015), and as reported by others (Dong et al., Reference Dong, Calkins, Compton, Medoff-Cooper, Barzilay, Taylor and Hodgson2021; Toutountzidis et al., Reference Toutountzidis, Gale, Irvine, Sharma and Laws2022) trauma type was not associated with schizotypal symptoms. While negative symptoms are core symptoms and originate from specific biological etiology like neuro-developmental reasons in patients with SCZ, they are less frequent and lower level in non-clinical populations. Different patterns of relationship we found between SCZ and other two groups may have originated from this.
We found that all kinds of CT were related to negative schemas of self in both SCZ and siblings. Additionally, CT was correlated to negative cognitive schemas toward others in SCZ and siblings. Our findings are in line with the findings of previous studies, which reported the relationship between CT and negative schema in patients with psychosis (Kilcommons & Morrison, Reference Kilcommons and Morrison2005), and in individuals at high risk for psychosis (Appiah-Kusi et al., Reference Appiah-Kusi, Fisher, Petros, Wilson, Mondelli, Garety and Bhattacharyya2017) In a recent study, it has been reported that negative other schema fully mediated the relationship between trauma and persecutory delusions/ideas (Humphrey, Berry, Degnan, & Bucci, Reference Humphrey, Berry, Degnan and Bucci2022). Our large sample size has given us the opportunity to search the mediating effect of cognitive schemas on relationship between individual types of childhood trauma and specific positive symptoms. Similar to the above-mentioned study, we found that the relationship between perscutory delusions and childhood sexual abuse was mediated by negative schemas related to self. We also found a mediating effect of negative schemas related to self on relationship between emotional abuse and Schneiderian symptoms, like thought broadcasting and thought withdrawal. Similar to our findings, mediating role of negative schemas related to self was reported as more prominent compared to other types of schemas in a recent meta-analysis (Alameda et al., Reference Alameda, Rodriguez, Carr, Aas, Trotta, Marino and Murray2020). Previously we reported that severity of Schneiderian symptoms was particularly related to severity of childhood trauma in patients with first-episode schizophrenia (Şahin et al., Reference Şahin, Yüksel, Güler, Karadayı, Akturan, Göde and Üçok2013). Our findings suggest that mediating role of the negative schemas about self is more prominent in delusions with bizarre content. Our findings may guide therapeutic interventions for both patients and healthy people with a history of childhood abuse. Since negative cognitive schemas have a moderating role in development of some positive symptoms, therapeutic interventions targeting to change negative schemas may help to prevent or reduce positive symptoms.
The present study has several strengths. To the best of our knowledge, the sample size is the largest among studies that included SCZ, sibling, and control groups. As our study is a part of a large international study, the scales we used to collect information are well-established and validated.
On the other hand, this study has limitations. Childhood adversities likely have differential influence on mental well-being over the developmental process; however, the CTQ does not provide information about the exact time period in which trauma has been experienced. There were more males in schizophrenia group compared to other groups, and the sex differences among groups may have an impact on exposure to different types of abuse/neglect. Also, our analyses did not take into account some potential confounding variables, such as genetic polymorphisms, premorbid adjustment. Finally, the retrospective nature of the data collection may be subject to recall bias.
In conclusion, we found that patients with psychosis were affected by childhood trauma more than their siblings and healthy controls. We also found that the impact of CT is prominent in some domains in the siblings and controls. Our findings suggest that CT has different impacts on mental health domains, and possibly on developmental processes of the central nervous system.
In future research, including the major confounding factors like premorbid adjustment level, and family history of mental disorders can increase our understanding of the interaction between CT and cognitive schemas in people with psychosis as well as non-clinical populations.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to all participants in this study.
Funding statement
This work was supported by the 7th Frame Work Programme of the European Union (Grant Agreement No: HEALTH-F2-2009-241909, Project EU-GEI).
Competing interests
None.