Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:45:39.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological well-being (PWB): a natural life outlook? An Italian twin study on heritability of PWB in young adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2011

A. Gigantesco ,
M. A. Stazi ,
G. Alessandri ,
E. Medda ,
E. Tarolla  and
C. Fagnani
A. Gigantesco*
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
M. A. Stazi
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
G. Alessandri
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, ‘Sapienza’University of Rome, Italy
E. Medda
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
E. Tarolla
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
C. Fagnani
Affiliation:
Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr A. Gigantesco, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Roma, Italy. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

To date, the genetic and environmental architecture of the dimensions of psychological well-being (PWB) remains unexplored.

Method

PWB of 742 twins aged 23–24 years and enrolled in the Italian Twin Registry was assessed with the three-item version of Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB). These scales include items for evaluating the PWB dimensions of self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth. A twin design was used to obtain correlations in the PWB dimensions for monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins and to estimate the contribution of genetic and environmental factors to variation and covariation in the dimensions.

Results

Genetic factors explained moderate to substantial proportions of variance in the six SPWB dimensions, with heritability estimates between 37% and 64%. The estimates of genetic correlations were very high (range 0.77–0.99), indicating that genetic factors that influence the expression of the different dimensions of PWB may be shared to a large extent. Non-shared environmental correlations ranged from substantial to high, with the exception of the correlation between autonomy and the dimensions of purpose in life, self-acceptance and personal growth.

Conclusions

This study presents a twin analysis of PWB measured by the SPWB dimensions; it was found that both genes and non-shared environment play a role in individual differences. The genetic and non-shared environmental correlations between SPWB dimensions suggest that common underlying genetic and non-shared environmental factors influence the expression of the different facets of PWB.

Keywords

Heritabilitypsychological well-beingtwin studywell-being therapy
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 41 , Issue 12 , December 2011 , pp. 2637 - 2649
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, M, Boisvert, CM (2006). Using positive psychology with special mental health populations. American Psychologist 61, 333–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, M, Boomsma, DI (2009). Born to be happy? The etiology of subjective well-being. Behavior Genetics 39, 605–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, M, Saviouk, V, de Moor, MHM, Willemsen, G, van Beijsterveldt, TCEM, Hottenga, JJ, de Geus, EJC, Boomsma, DI (2010). Heritability and genome-wide linkage scan of subjective happiness. Twin Research and Human Genetics 13, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, MW, Cudeck, R (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models (ed. Bollen and, K. A.Long, J. S.), pp. 136–162. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
Burns, RA, Machin, MA (2010). Identifying gender differences in the independent effects of personality and psychological well-being on two broad affect components of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences 48, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloud, J, Vaughan, GM (1970). Using balanced scales to control acquiescence. Sociometry 33, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S, Alpen, CM, Doyle, WJ, Treanor, JJ, Turner, RB (2006). Positive emotional style predicts resistance to illness after experimental exposure to rhinovirus or influenza A virus. Psychosomatic Medicine 68, 809–815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, S, Doyle, WJ, Turner, RB, Alper, CM, Skoner, DP (2003). Emotional style and susceptibility to the common cold. Psychosomatic Medicine 65, 652–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, Jr. PT, McCrae, RR (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, PT, McCrae, RR (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL.Google Scholar
Davidson, RJ (1998). Anterior electrophysiological asymmetries, emotion, and depression: conceptual and methodological conundrums. Psychophysiology 35, 607–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeNeve, KM, Cooper, H (1998). The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin 95, 542–575.Google Scholar
Diener, E, Lucas, RE (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (ed. Kahneman, E., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N.), pp. 213–229. Russell Sage Foundation: New York.Google Scholar
Diener, E, Seligman, MEP (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science 13, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiStefano, C, Motl, RW (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling 13, 440–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagnani, C, Brescianini, S, Cotichini, R, D'Ippolito, C, Dukic, T, Giannantonio, L, Medda, E, Nisticò, L, Patriarca, V, Pulciani, S, Rotondi, D, Toccaceli, V, Stazi, MA (2006). The Italian Twin Register: new cohorts and tools, current projects and future perspectives of a developing resource. Twin Research and Human Genetics 9, 799–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fava, GA, Rafanelli, C, Cazzaro, M, Conti, S, Grandi, S (1998). Well-being therapy: a novel psychotherapeutic approach for residual symptoms of affective disorders. Psychological Medicine 28, 475–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fava, GA, Ruini, C, Rafanelli, C, Finos, L, Salmaso, L, Mangelli, L, Sirigatti, S (2005). Well-being therapy of generalized anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 74, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fava, GA, Ruini, C, Sonino, N (2003). Management of recurrent depression in primary care. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 72, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fava, GA, Tomba, E, Grandi, S (2007). The road to recovery from depression. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 76, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, EM, Hayney, MS, Dienberg Love, G, Urry, HL, Rosenkranz, MA, Davidson, RJ, Singer, BH, Ryff, CD (2005). Social relationships, sleep quality, and interleukin-6 in aging women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102, 18757–18762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L, Bentler, PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, ES (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction in children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research 66, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendler, KS, Gardner, CO (2001). Monozygotic twins discordant for major depression: a preliminary exploration of the role of environmental experiences in the aetiology and course of illness. Psychological Medicine 31, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keyes, CL, Myers, JM, Kendler, KS (2010). The structure of the genetic and environmental influences on mental well-being. American Journal of Public Health 100, 2379–2384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keyes, CLM, Shmotkin, D, Ryff, CD (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, RB (1998). Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Kling, KC, Ryff, CD, Love, G, Essex, M (2003). Exploring the influence of personality on depressive symptoms and self-esteem across a significant life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85, 922–932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyvik, KO, Green, A, Beck-Nielsen, H (1995). The new Danish Twin Register: establishment and analysis of twinning rates. International Journal of Epidemiology 24, 589–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindfors, P, Berntsson, L, Lundberg, U (2006). Factor structure of Ryff's psychological well-being scales in Swedish female and male white-collar workers. Personality and Individual Differences 40, 1213–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lykken, D, Tellegen, A (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science 73, 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsland, AL, Cohen, S, Rabin, BS, Manuck, SB (2006). Trait positive affect and antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 20, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, LK, Muthén, BO (2004). Mplus User's Guide. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Neale, MC, Boker, SM, Xie, G, Maes, H (2006). Mx: Statistical Modeling, 7th edn.Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University: Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
Neale, MC, Cardon, LR (1992). Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nes, RB, Czajkowski, N, Tambs, K (2010). Family matters: happiness in nuclear families and twins. Behavior Genetics 40, 577–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nes, RB, Røysamb, E, Reichborn-Kjennerud, T, Tambs, K, Harris, JR (2005). Subjective wellbeing and sleep problems: a bivariate twin study. Twin Research and Human Genetics 8, 440–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nes, RB, Røysamb, E, Tambs, K, Harris, JR, Reichborn-Kjennerud, T (2006). Subjective well-being: genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychological Medicine 36, 1033–1042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunnally, JC (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY.Google Scholar
Pedhazur, EJ, Pedhazur Schmelkin, L (1991). Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Polk, DE, Cohen, S, Doyle, WJ (2005). State and trait affect as predictors of salivary cortisol in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pressman, SD, Cohen, S (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin 131, 925–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Røysamb, E, Harris, JR, Magnus, P, Vitterso, J, Tambs, K (2002). Subjective well-being: sex-specific effects of genetic and environmental factors. Personality and Individual Differences 32, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Røysamb, E, Tambs, K, Reichborn-Kjennerud, T, Neale, MC, Harris, JR (2003). Happiness and health: environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective well-being, perceived health, and somatic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85, 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruini, C, Ottolini, F, Rafanelli, C, Tossani, E, Ryff, CD, Fava, GA (2003). The relationship of psychological well-being to distress and personality. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 72, 268–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, RM, Deci, EL (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryff, CD (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryff, CD, Dienberg Love, G, Urry, HL, Muller, D, Rosenkranz, MA, Friedman, EM, Davidson, RJ, Singer, BH (2006). Psychological well-being and ill-being: do they have distinct or mirrored biological correlates? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 75, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryff, CD, Keyes, CL (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 719–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryff, CD, Lee, YH, Essex, MJ, Schmutte, PS (1994). My children and me: midlife evaluations of grown children and self. Psychology and Aging 9, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryff, CD, Singer, BH (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 9, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmutte, PS, Ryff, CD (1997). Personality and well-being: reexamining methods and meanings, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seligman, MEP, Rashid, T, Parks, AC (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychology 61, 774–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spotts, EL, Pederson, NL, Neiderhiser, JM, Reiss, D, Lichtenstein, P, Hansson, K, Cederblad, M (2005). Genetic effects on women's positive mental health: do marital relationships and social support matter? Journal of Family Psychology 19, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stapleton, L (2006). An assessment of practical solutions for structural equation modeling with complex sample data. Structural Equation Modeling 13, 28–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stazi, MA, Cotichini, R, Patriarca, V, Brescianini, S, Fagnani, C, D'Ippolito, C, Cannoni, S, Ristori, G, Salvetti, M (2002). The Italian Twin Project: from the personal identification number to a national twin registry. Twin Research 5, 382–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steptoe, A, Gibson, EL, Hamer, M, Wardle, J (2006). Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular correlates of positive affect measured by ecological momentary assessment and by questionnaire. Psychoneuroendocrinology 32, 56–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stubbe, JH, Posthuma, D, Boomsma, DI, de Geus, EJC (2005). Heritability of life satisfaction in adults: a twin-family study. Psychological Medicine 35, 1581–1588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tellegen, A, Lykken, DT, Bouchard, TJ Jr., Wilcox, KJ, Segal, NL, Rich, S (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1031–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urry, HL, Nitschke, JB, Dolski, I, Jackson, DC, Dalton, KM, Mueller, CJ, Rosenkranz, MA, Ryff, CD, Singer, BH, Richard, J, Davidson, RJ (2004). Making a life worth living: neural correlates of well-being. Psychological Science 15, 367–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dierendonck, D (2005). The construct validity of Ryff's scales of psychological well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and Individual Differences 36, 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T, Stewart, CA (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, A, Bates, TC, Luciano, M (2008). Happiness is a personal(ity) thing: the genetics of personality and well-being in a representative sample. Psychological Science 19, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, A, King, JE, Enns, RM (2002). Subjective well-being is heritable and genetically correlated with dominance in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 1141–1149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, AM, Joseph, S (2010). The absence of positive psychological (eudemonic) well-being as a risk factor for depression: a ten year cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders 122, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed