Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:16:03.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘A plastic power ministering to organisation’: interpretations of the mind–body relation in late nineteenth-century British psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Michael J. Clark
Michael J. Clark*
Affiliation:
Linacre College, Oxford
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr M. J. Clark, 27 Bridgewood Road, Worcester Park, Surrey.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Late nineteenth-century medico-psychological approaches to the mind–body problem are discussed in relation to psychiatry's theoretical constitution as a distinct ‘mind–body’ science and practice, and to John Hughlings Jackson's ‘doctrine of concomitance’. Psychiatric ‘explanations’ of the mind–body relation are interpreted as expressions of psychiatry's independent professional interests vis-à-vis neurology and general medicine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , August 1983 , pp. 487 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerknecht, E. H. (1968). A Short History of Psychiatry (transl. wolff, S.). Hafner: New York.Google Scholar
Bain, A. (1867). On the correlation of force in its bearing on mind. Macmillan's Magazine 16, 372–383.Google Scholar
Bain, A. (1872). Mind and Body: The Theories of Their Relation. H. S. King: London.Google Scholar
Bastian, H. C. (1880). The Brain as an Organ of Mind. Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
Blustein, B. E. (1981). “A hollow square of psychological science”: American neurologists and psychiatrists in conflict. In Madhouses, Mad-Doctors and Madmen (ed. Scull, A. T.), pp. 241–270. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia/Athlone Press: London.Google Scholar
Brain, Sir W. R. (1958). Hughlings Jackson's ideas of consciousness in the light of today. In The History and Philosophy of Knowledge of the Brain and its Functions (ed. Poynter, F. N. L.), pp. 83–91. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Browne, J. C. (1883). Education and the nervous system. In The Book of Health vol. 1 (ed. Morris, M.), pp. 269–380. Cassell: London.Google Scholar
Bucknill, J. C. & Tuke, D. H. (1879). A Manual of Psychological Medicine (4th revd edn). Churchill's: London.Google Scholar
Bynum, W. F. (1974). Rationales for therapy in British psychiatry, 1780–1835. Medical History 18, 317–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, W. B. (1857). The phasis of force. National Review 4, 359–394.Google Scholar
Carpenter, W. B. (1881). Principles of Mental Physiology (6th edn). Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1874). Body and mind. In Lectures and Essays By the Late William Kingdon Clifford (2nd edn, 1886) (ed. Pollock, F. and Stephen, L.), pp. 244–273. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Clouston, T. S. (1891). The Neuroses of Development. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H. T. Jr (1975). John Hughlings Jackson and the mind–body relation. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 49, 137–151.Google Scholar
Ferrier, D. (1876). The Functions of the Brain. Smith, Elder: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearnshaw, L. S. (1964). A Short History of British Psychology 1840–1940. Methuen: London.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1874). On the hypothesis that animals are automata, and its history. In Methods and Results (1894), pp. 199–250. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Hyslop, T. B. (1895). Mental Physiology, Especially in its Relation to Mental Disorders. Churchill: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1931–1932). Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson (2 vols) (ed. Taylor, J., Holmes, G. and Walshe, F. M. R.). Hodder and Stoughton: London.Google Scholar
Jacyna, L. S. (1980). Somatic theories of mind and social interests in Britain, 1850–1880. Unpublished paper read to the joint Conference of the British Sociological Association and the British Society for the History of Science held at Bath,27–29 March 1980.Google Scholar
Jacyna, L. S. (1981). The physiology of mind, the unity of nature, and the moral order in victorian thought. British Journal for the History of Science 14, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Journal of Mental Science (1890). Discussion of the Report of the L.C.C. Committee on the care and treatment of the insane in London; 588–587, 590.Google Scholar
Laycock, T. (1855). Further researches into the functions of the brain. British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review 16, 155–187.Google Scholar
Laycock, T. (1860). Mind and Brain: Or, the Correlations of Consciousness and Organisation (2 vols). Simpkin, Marshall and Co.: London.Google Scholar
Laycock, T. (1861). The Scientific Place and Principles of Medical Psychology (reprinted from the Edinburgh Medical Journal).Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1879 a). The Physical Basis of Mind (2nd series of Problems of Life and Mind). Trübner: London.Google Scholar
Lewes, G. H. (1879 b). The Study of Psychology: Its Objects, Scope and Method. Trübner: London.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. B. (1889). A Textbook of Mental Diseases. Griffin: London.Google Scholar
McIlwain, H. W. (1955). Maudsley, Mott and Mann on the Chemical Physiology and Pathology of the Mind. Lewis: London.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1867). The Physiology and Pathology of Mind. Macmillan: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1870). Body and Mind. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1872). Responsibility in Mental Disease. Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1876). The Physiology of Mind. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1883). Body and Will. Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
Maudsley, H. (1895). The Pathology of Mind. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Mercier, C. (1883–1884). Review of Body and Will. Brain 6, 531–538.Google Scholar
Mercier, C. (1890). Sanity and Insanity. Walter Scott: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, C. (1892). Consciousness. In A Dictionary of Psychological Medicine Vol. 1 (ed. Tuke, D. H.), pp. 249–265. Churchill: London.Google Scholar
Mercier, C. (1912). Recollections [of John Hughlings Jackson]. Reprinted in Jackson, J. H. (1925). Neurological Fragments (ed. Taylor, J.). Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Ray, L. J. (1981). Models of madness in Victorian asylum practice. European Journal of Sociology 22. 229–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riese, W. (1949). An outline of a history of ideas in neurology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 23, 111–136.Google ScholarPubMed
Riese, W. (1954). Hughlings Jackson's doctrine of consciousness. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 120, 330–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riese, W. (1959). A History of Neurology. M.D. Publications: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riese, W. (1967). The neuropsychologic phase in the history of psychiatric thought. In Historical Derivations of Modern Psychiatry (ed. Galdston, I.), chapter 4. Blakiston–McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson's: London.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1951). Systematically misleading expressions. In Essays on Logic and Language (1st series) (ed. Flew, A. G. N.), pp. 11–36. Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Scull, A. T. (1975). From madness to mental illness: medical men as moral entrepreneurs. European Journal of Sociology 16, 218–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scull, A. T. (1979). Museums of Madness: The Social Organisation of Insanity in Nineteenth Century England. Allen Lane: London.Google Scholar
Smith, C. U. M. (1982 a). Evolution and the problem of mind: Part I. Herbert Spencer. Journal of the History of Biology 15, 55–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. U. M. (1982 b). Evolution and the problem of mind: Part II. John Hughlings Jackson. Journal of the History of Biology 15. 241–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. (1970). Physiological psychology and the philosophy of nature in mid-nineteenth-century Britain. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1981). Trial by Medicine. Insanity and Responsibility in Victorian Trials. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1982). Continuity, evolution and the mind–body relation. Unpublished paper delivered to the Wellcome Symposium on ‘Darwin and the Doctors’ held at the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London, 25 June 1982.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1870–1972). The Principles of Psychology (2 vols). Williams and Norgate: London.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. (1967). Categories. In The Encyclopaedia of Philosophy Vol. 2 (ed. Edwards, P.), pp. 46–55. Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
Tuke, D. H. (1881). Progress of psychological medicine during the last forty years (Presidential Address to the Medico-Psychological Association). Journal of Mental Science 27, 305–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyndall, J. (1878). Consciousness, organisation, free will, heredity, responsibility, etc. Journal of Mental Science 24, 107–116.Google Scholar
Walshe, F. M. R. (1958). Some reflections upon the opening phase of the physiology of the cerebral cortex, 1850–1900. In The History and Philosophy of Knowledge of the Brain and its Functions (ed Poynter, F. N. L.), pp. 223–234. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Yellowlees, D. (1890). Presidential Address to the Medico-Psychological Association. Journal of Mental Science 36, 476–489.Google Scholar
Young, R. M. (1970). Mind, Brain and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century. Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Young, R. M. (1973 a). Psychology in the nineteenth-century evolutionary debate. In Historical Conceptions of Psychology (ed. Henle, M., Jaynes, J. and Sullivan, J.), pp. 180–204. Springer: New York.Google Scholar
Young, R. M. (1973 b). The historiographic and ideological contexts of the nineteenth century debate on man's place in nature. In Changing Perspectives in the History of Science: Essays in Honour of Joseph Needham (ed. Young, R. M. and Teich, M.), pp. 344–438. Heinemann: London.Google Scholar