Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:28:47.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys of Great Britain – strategy and methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1997

R. JENKINS
Affiliation:
Mental Health Division, Department of Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London Medical School, Institute of Psychiatry and Social Survey Division, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
P. BEBBINGTON
Affiliation:
Mental Health Division, Department of Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London Medical School, Institute of Psychiatry and Social Survey Division, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
T. BRUGHA
Affiliation:
Mental Health Division, Department of Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London Medical School, Institute of Psychiatry and Social Survey Division, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
M. FARRELL
Affiliation:
Mental Health Division, Department of Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London Medical School, Institute of Psychiatry and Social Survey Division, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
B. GILL
Affiliation:
Mental Health Division, Department of Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London Medical School, Institute of Psychiatry and Social Survey Division, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
G. LEWIS
Affiliation:
Mental Health Division, Department of Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London Medical School, Institute of Psychiatry and Social Survey Division, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
H. MELTZER
Affiliation:
Mental Health Division, Department of Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London Medical School, Institute of Psychiatry and Social Survey Division, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
M. PETTICREW
Affiliation:
Mental Health Division, Department of Health, Department of Psychiatry, University College London Medical School, Institute of Psychiatry and Social Survey Division, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leicester; Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff

Abstract

Background. This paper describes the rationale and methodology of the first national psychiatric morbidity surveys to be carried out in Great Britain. The objectives of the surveys were to estimate the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults aged 16–64 living in Great Britain; to identify the nature and extent of social disabilities associated with psychiatric morbidity; to describe the use of health and social services by people with psychiatric morbidity and to investigate the association between mental illness and potential environmental risk factors in a household sample.

Methods. Four separate surveys were carried out in order to meet the objectives; a private household sample (N=10108), a sample of institutions caring for the mentally ill (N=1191), a sample of homeless people (N=1166), and a supplementary sample of patients with psychosis living in private households (N=350). A two-stage assessment procedure was used, in which all subjects were given the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) administered by lay interviewers to assess neurotic symptoms and disorders and a psychosis screen, including the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire. Those who were positive on the psychosis screen were then interviewed by psychiatrists using the SCAN (incorporating the tenth edition of the Present State Examination).

Conclusions. Large scale national surveys such as this augment the inadequate data on psychiatric morbidity that are routinely available and are, therefore, an important source of information upon which to base policy and generate aetiological hypotheses. These surveys provide a possible model for similar surveys in other countries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)