Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T22:00:59.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A multiple criterion screen for identifying secondary school children with psychiatric disorder: Characteristics and efficiency of screen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

A. Macmillan ,
I. Kolvin ,
R. F. Garside ,
A. R. Nicol  and
I. M. Leitch
A. Macmillan*
Affiliation:
Human Development Unit, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
I. Kolvin*
Affiliation:
Human Development Unit, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
R. F. Garside
Affiliation:
Human Development Unit, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
A. R. Nicol
Affiliation:
Human Development Unit, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
I. M. Leitch
Affiliation:
Human Development Unit, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
*
1Address for reprints: Mr A. Macmillan, Department of Psychological Services and Research, Crichton Royal Hospital, Dumfries.
2Address for correspondence: Professor I. Kolvin, Human Development Unit, 1 Tankerville Terrace, Jesmond, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 3AH.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A multiple criterion screen was developed as part of a study which was designed to assess different types of intervention for school children with psychiatric disorder. The foremost requirement was that false positives be kept to a minimum, with selected children being unequivocally disturbed. Children were identified for treatment by the following measures: (a) teacher rating on the Rutter B2 Scale, giving a total score and subscores for neurotic and antisocial behaviour; (b) peer ratings on a sociometric measure, yielding isolation and rejection scores; and (c) self ratings on the Junior Eysenck Personality Inventory, specifically the neuroticism dimension. A weighting system was developed so that children could be selected on the basis of extreme scores on either teacher or self-rating measures alone, or by a combination of less extreme scores on more than one measure. The results are presented and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , May 1980 , pp. 265 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Booth, G. & Taylor, M. (1973). Some problems in the rating of child behaviour by teachers. Journal of Association of Educational Psychologists 3, 13–17.Google Scholar
Bower, E. (1969). Early Identification of Emotionally Handicapped Children in School. Thomas: Springfield, Ill.Google Scholar
Brophy, J. & Good, T. (1970). Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: some behaviour data. Journal of Educational Psychology 61, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B. (1976). Piggies in the middle or ‘Who, sir? No, not me, sir’. In The Disruptive Pupil in the Secondary School (ed. Jones-Davies, C. and Cave, R. G.), pp. 26–34. Ward Lock Educational: London.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Cookson, D. (1969). Personality in primary school children. 2. Teachers' ratings. British Journal of Educational Psychology 39, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, S. B. G. (1965). Manual of the Junior Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press: London.Google Scholar
Fremont, T. S., Klingsporn, M. J. & Wilson, J. H. (1976). Identifying emotional disturbance in children – the professionals differ. Journal of School Psychology 14, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, J. & Bing, M. (1973). The elusiveness of Pygmalion and differences in teacher–pupil contacts. Interchange 4, 34–42.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Maudsley Monograph no. 21. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Kolvin, I., Garside, R. F., Nicol, A. R., Macmillan, A. & Wolstenholme, F. (1976). Maladjusted pupils in ordinary schools. Special Education: Forward Trends 3, 15–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Kolvin, I., Garside, R. F., Nicol, A. R., Leitch, I. M. & Macmillan, A. (1977). Screening school children for high risk of emotional and educational disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry 131, 192–206.Google Scholar
Macmillan, A., Walker, L., Garside, R. F., Kolvin, I., Leitch, I. M. & Nicol, A. R. (1978). The development and application of sociometric techniques for the identification of isolated and rejected children. Journal of Association of Workers for Maladjusted Children 6, 58–74.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and Assessment. John Wiley: London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. & Shepherd, M. (1966). A comparative study of children's behaviour at home and at school. British Journal of Educational Psychology 36, 248–254.Google Scholar
Neligan, G. A., Prudham, D. & Steiner, H. (1975). The Formative Years: Birth, Family and Development in Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Oxford University Press for the Nuffield Provinicial Hospitals Trust: Oxford.Google Scholar
Nicol, A. R., Kolvin, I., Garside, R. F., Macmillan, A., Wolstenholme, F. & Leitch, I. M. (1980). A multiple criterion screen for identifying secondary school children with psychiatric disorder. II. Studies in validity (in preparation).Google Scholar
Powell, G. E. (1977). Psychoticism and social deviancy in children. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy 1, 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M. (1967). A children's behaviour questionnaire for completion by teachers: preliminary findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 8, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M. (1977). Surveys to answer questions: some methodological considerations. In Epidemiological Approaches in Child Psychiatry (ed. Graham, P. J.), pp. 1–30. Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Tizard, J. & Whitmore, K. (1970). Education, Health and Behaviour. Longman: London.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Cox, A., Tupling, C., Berger, M. & Yule, W. (1975). Attainment and adjustment in two geographical areas. 1. The prevalence of psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry 126, 493–509.Google Scholar
Semler, I. J. (1960). Relationships among several measures of pupil adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology 51, 60–64.Google Scholar
Tizard, J. (1968). Questionnaire measures of maladjustment: a postscript to the symposium. British Journal of Educational Psychology 38, 9–13.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. F. & O'Connor, J. D. (1968). When are children disturbed? Elementary School Journal 68, 353–356.Google Scholar
Wickman, E. K. (1928). Children's Behaviour and Teachers' Attitudes. Commonwealth Fund: New York.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. A. (1974). Adjustment in the classroom. 2. Patterns of adaptation. Research in Education 11, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrate, R. M., Nicol, A. R. & Kolvin, I. (1980). Reliability of clinical ratings of psychiatric disorder from standard case records (in preparation).Google Scholar