Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:48:32.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mental health care in Southern Italy: application of case–control methodology for the evaluation of the impact of the 1978 psychiatric reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Paola Bollini*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Istiuto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri’, Milan
Giovanni Muscettola
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, II Medical School, University of Naples, Italy
Antonella Piazza
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Istiuto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri’, Milan
Maurizio Puca
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, II Medical School, University of Naples, Italy
Gianni Tognoni
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Istiuto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri’, Milan
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Paola Bollini, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Insituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘M. Negri’, Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milan, Italy

Synopsis

A survey to analyse patients' characteristics and the care delivered to them was conducted in several psychiatric facilities, covering the whole range of care offered in the public sector in two regions of Southern Italy. A case–control method of analysis was chosen, and the relative risk estimates (RR), together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI), of being in custodial facilities were computed, comparing patients treated in custodial institutions (‘cases’) with those in community-based services (‘controls’) in respect of social and clinical vairables. Factors more stongly associated with custodial treatment were: illiteracy (RR = 2·4), unmarried status (RR =2·4), a history of prolonged illness (RR = 7·6), organic diagnosis (RR = 2·6), previous custodial treatment (RR = 3·9), and expected poor social functioning (RR =2·4). The suitability and advantages of the case–control method of analysis in the field of psychiatric care evaluation are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellantuono, C., Reggi, V., Tognoni, G. & Muscettola, G. (1981). Comparison of practice in hospitals and community mental health centers. In Epidemiological Impact of Psychotropic Drugs (ed. Tognoni, G., Bellantuono, C. and Lader, M.), pp. 171181. Elsevier/North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, R., Kreisman, D. & O'Connor, P. A. (1982). Return to the family and its consequence for rehospitalization among recently discharged mental patients. Psychological Medicine 12, 141147.Google Scholar
Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (2nd edn). John Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Istituto Centrale di Statistica (1984). Annuario di Statistiche Sanitarie, vol. xxv, Edizione 1980.Google Scholar
Keller, M. B., Klerman, G. L., Lavori, P. W., Fawcett, J. A., Coryell, W. & Endicott, J. (1982). Treatment received by depressed patients. Journal of the American Medical Association 248, 18481855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malla, A. K. & Norman, R. M. G. (1983). Mental hospital and general hospital psychiatric units: a comparison of services within the same geographic area. Psychological Medicine 13, 431439.Google ScholarPubMed
Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: extension of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 690700.Google Scholar
Mantel, N. & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22, 719748.Google ScholarPubMed
Miettinen, O. (1976). Estimability and estimation of case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 103, 226235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosher, L. R. (1982). Italy's revolutionary mental health law: an assessment. American Journal of Psychiatry 139, 199203.Google ScholarPubMed
Pokorny, A. D., Thornby, J., Kaplan, H. B. & Ball, D. (1976). Prediction of chronicity in psychiatric patients. Archives of General Psychiatry 33, 932937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redlich, F. & Kellert, S. R. (1978). Trends in American mental health. American Journal of Psychiatry 135, 2228.Google ScholarPubMed
Saraceno, B. (1983). Stato e significato della funzione psichiatrica oggi in Italia. Practitioner (Ed.It.) 66, 3851.Google Scholar
Tognoni, G. & Bignami, G. (1981). The confounding role of institution in scientific evaluation. In Epidemiological Impact of Psychotropic Drugs (ed. Tognoni, G., Bellantuono, C. and Lader, M.), pp. 281297. Elsevier/North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Watt, D. C., Katz, K. & Shepherd, M. (1983). The natural history of schizophrenia: a 5-year prospective follow-up of a representative sample of schizophrenics by means of a standardized clinical and social assessment. Psychological Medicine 13, 663670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. K. (1980). Social psychiatry in the United Kingdom: the approach to schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 6, 556565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1979). Schizophrenia. An International Follow-up Study. John Wiley & Sons: New York.Google Scholar
Zubin, J., Magaziner, J. & Steinhauer, S. R. (1983). The metamorphosis of schizophrenia: from chronicity to vulnerability. Psychological Medicine 13, 551571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed