Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:36:53.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental disorder, criminal responsibility and the social history of theories of volition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Roger Smith
Roger Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Lancaster
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Roger Smith, Department of History, University of Lancaster, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YG.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Nineteenth-century theories of human volition are discussed in relation to ideas on insanity and responsibility. Attention is drawn to the importance of accounts of volition for medical psychologists and to the implications of these accounts for medical and lay discussion of criminal responsibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 13 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackernecht, E. H. (1967). Medicine at the Paris Hospital 1794–1848. Johns Hopkins: Baltimore.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1970). Lectures on Jurisprudence, Vol. 2, pp. 79–99. Burt Franklin: New York. (First published 1861.)Google Scholar
Bass, G. (1964). Die Gerichtsmedizin als Spezialfach in Paris von 1800 bis 1850. Juris-Verlag: Zürich.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1927). The vulgar notion of responsibility in connexion with the theories of freewill and necessity. In Ethical Studies, pp. 25–26. Clarendon Press: Oxford. (First published 1876.)Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte. Duncker and Humblot: Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bucknill, J. C. & Tuke, D. H. (1858). A Manual of Psychological Medicine. Churchill: London.Google Scholar
Casper, J. L. (1865). A Handbook of the Practice of Forensic Medicine, vol. 4 (trans. Balfour, G. W.). New Sydenham Society: London.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (1934). S. T. Coleridge's Treatise on Method as Published in the Encyclopaedia Metropolitana (ed. Snyder, A. D.), p. 32. Constable: London. (First published 1818.)Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (1956). Biographia Literaria (ed. Watson, G.), pp. 51–80. Dent: London. (First published 1817.)Google Scholar
Condillac, E. B. Abbé de (1930). Dissertation on freedom. In Condillac's Treatise on the Sensations (trans. Carr, G.). Favil: London.Google Scholar
Destutt de Tracy, A.-L.-C. (1804, 1815). Éléments d'ldéologie, Vols. 1 and 5, chs. 11–12. Courcier: Paris.Google Scholar
Esquirol, J. E. D. (1838). Des Maladies Mentales. J.-B. Baillière: Paris. Especially Vol. 2, pp. 790–843.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (ed.) (1975). I, Pierre Rivière, Having Slaughtered My Mother, My Sister, and My Brother (trans. Jellinek, F.). Pantheon: New York.Google Scholar
Griesinger, W. (1867). Mental Pathology and Therapeutics (trans. Robertson, C. L. and Rutherford, J.), p. 6. New Sydenham Society: London.Google Scholar
Halévy, E. (1952). The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism (trans. Morris, M.), part 3, ch. 3. Faber and Faber: London.Google Scholar
Heinroth, J. C. (1975). Textbook of Disturbances of Life, or Disturbances of the Soul and their Treatment (intro. G. Mora). Johns Hopkins: Baltimore.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1958). Selected Writings (ed. Taylor, J.). Staples: London. (First published 1931.)Google Scholar
Marx, O. M. (1965). A re-evaluation of the mentalists in early 19th century German psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry 121, 752–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marx, O. M. (1972). Wilhelm Griesinger and the history of psychiatry: a reassessment. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 46, 519–544.Google Scholar
Mayo, T. (1854). Medical Testimony and Evidence in Cases of Lunacy. Parker: London.Google Scholar
Mill, J. (1829). Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. Baldwin and Cradock: London.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1962). On Bentham and Coleridge. Harper and Row: New York.Google Scholar
Moore, F. C. T. (1970). The Psychology of Maine de Biran. Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Picavet, F. J. (1971). Les Idéologues, pp. 305–320. Burt Franklin: New York. (First published 1891.)Google Scholar
Pinel, P. (1801). Traité Médico-philosophique sur l'Aliénation Mentale. Richard, Caille and Ravier: Paris.Google Scholar
Pinel, P. (1809). Traité Médico-philosophique sur l'Aliénation Mentale (2nd edn). J. A. Brosson: Paris.Google Scholar
Stephen, J. F. (1863). A General View of the Criminal Law of England, p. 75. Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Stephen, J. F. (1883). A History of the Criminal Law of England (Facsimile edn), Vol. 2, p. 100. Burt Franklin: New York.Google Scholar
Walker, N. (1968). Crime and Insanity in England, Vol. 1. The Historical Perspective. Edinburgh University: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ward, J. (1886). Psychology. In Encyclopaedia Britannica (9th edn), Vol. 20. Black: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review 20, 158–177.Google Scholar
Winslow, F. (1854). Lettsonian Lectures on Insanity. Churchill: London.Google Scholar