Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:35:31.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of metamemory functioning in the at-risk mental state for psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2015

S. Eisenacher ,
F. Rausch ,
F. Ainser ,
D. Mier ,
R. Veckenstedt ,
F. Schirmbeck ,
A. Lewien ,
S. Englisch ,
C. Andreou  and
S. Moritz
...Show all authors
S. Eisenacher*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
F. Rausch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
F. Ainser
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
D. Mier
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim Mannheim, Germany
R. Veckenstedt
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
F. Schirmbeck
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
A. Lewien
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
S. Englisch
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
C. Andreou
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
S. Moritz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
A. Meyer-Lindenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
P. Kirsch
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim Mannheim, Germany
M. Zink
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg/Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
*
* Address for correspondence: S. Eisenacher, M.Sc. (Psych.), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Central Institute of Mental Health, PO Box 12 21 20, D-68072 Mannheim, Germany. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Metamemory describes the monitoring and knowledge about one's memory capabilities. Patients with schizophrenia have been found to be less able in differentiating between correct and false answers (smaller confidence gap) when asked to provide retrospective confidence ratings in previous studies. Furthermore, higher proportions of very-high-confident but false responses have been found in this patient group (high knowledge corruption). Whether and how these biases contribute to the early pathogenesis of psychosis is yet unclear. This study thus aimed at investigating metamemory function in the early course of psychosis.

Method

Patients in an at-risk mental state for psychosis (ARMS, n = 34), patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP, n = 21) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 38) were compared on a verbal recognition task combined with retrospective confidence-level ratings.

Results

FEP patients showed the smallest confidence gap, followed by ARMS patients, followed by HCs. All groups differed significantly from each other. Regarding knowledge corruption, FEP patients differed significantly from HCs, whereas a statistical trend was revealed in comparison of ARMS and FEP groups. Correlations were revealed between metamemory, measures of positive symptoms and working memory performance.

Conclusions

These data underline the presence of a metamemory bias in ARMS patients which is even more pronounced in FEP patients. The bias might represent an early cognitive marker of the beginning psychotic state. Longitudinal studies are needed to unravel whether metacognitive deficits predict the transition to psychosis and to evaluate therapeutic interventions.

Keywords

At-risk mental statecognitive biasesfirst episode of psychosismemory confidencemetacognition
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 45 , Issue 15 , November 2015 , pp. 3329 - 3340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreou, C, Moritz, S, Veith, K, Veckenstedt, R, Naber, D (2013). Dopaminergic modulation of probabilistic reasoning and overconfidence in errors:a double-blind study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 40, 558–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, CH (2002). The Ashton Manual. (http://www.benzo.org.uk/manual/index.Htm). Accesssed 10 February 2015.Google Scholar
Broome, MR, Johns, LC, Valli, I, Woolley, JB, Tabraham, P, Brett, C, Valmaggia, L, Peters, E, Garety, PA, McGuire, PK (2007). Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry (Suppl.) 51, s38–s42.Google Scholar
Chua, EF, Schacter, DL, Sperling, RA (2009). Neural correlates of metamemory: a comparison of feeling-of-knowing and retrospective confidence judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21, 1751–1765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deese, J (1959). On the prediction of occurence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eifler, S, Rausch, F, Schirmbeck, F, Veckenstedt, R, Englisch, S, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Kirsch, P, Zink, M (2014 b). Neurocognitive capabilities modulate the integration of evidence in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 219, 72–78.Google Scholar
Eifler, S, Rausch, F, Schirmbeck, F, Veckenstedt, R, Mier, D, Esslinger, C, Englisch, S, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Kirsch, P, Zink, M (2014 a). Metamemory in schizophrenia: retrospective confidence ratings interact with neurocognitive deficits. Psychiatry Research 225, 596–603.Google Scholar
Fine, C, Gardner, M, Craigie, J, Gold, I (2007). Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the role of the JTC bias in delusions. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 12, 46–77.Google Scholar
Flavell, JH (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34, 906–911.Google Scholar
Freeman, D (2007). Suspicious minds: the psychology of persecutory delusions. Clinical Psychology Review 27, 425–457.Google Scholar
Freeman, D, Garety, P (2014). Advances in understanding and treating persecutory delusions: a review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 49, 1179–1189.Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P, Bonoldi, I, Yung, AR, Borgwardt, S, Kempton, MJ, Valmaggia, L, Barale, F, Caverzasi, E, McGuire, P (2012). Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Archives of General Psychiatry 69, 220–229.Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P, Borgwardt, S, Bechdolf, A, Addington, J, Riecher-Rossler, A, Schultze-Lutter, F, Keshavan, M, Wood, S, Ruhrmann, S, Seidman, LJ, Valmaggia, L, Cannon, T, Velthorst, E, de, HL, Cornblatt, B, Bonoldi, I, Birchwood, M, McGlashan, T, Carpenter, W, McGorry, P, Klosterkotter, J, McGuire, P, Yung, A (2013). The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 107–120.Google Scholar
Garety, PA, Freeman, D, Jolley, S, Dunn, G, Bebbington, PE, Fowler, DG, Kuipers, E, Dudley, R (2005). Reasoning, emotions, and delusional conviction in psychosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 114, 373–384.Google Scholar
Gaweda, L, Moritz, S, Kokoszka, A (2012). Impaired discrimination between imagined and perfomed actions in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 195, 1–8.Google Scholar
Gaweda, L, Woodward, TS, Moritz, S, Kokoszka, A (2013). Impaired action self-monitoring in schizophrenia patients with auditory hallucinations. Schizophrenia Research 144, 72–79.Google Scholar
Gilleen, J, Greenwood, K, David, AS (2014). The role of memory in awareness of memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, and brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 36, 43–57.Google Scholar
Goldstein, G, Beers, SR, Shemansky, WJ (1996). Neuropsychological differences between schizophrenic patients with heterogeneous Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance. Schizophrenia Research 21, 13–18.Google Scholar
Gusnard, DA, Raichle, ME, Raichle, ME (2001). Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 685–694.Google Scholar
Häfner, H, Bechdolf, A, Klosterkoetter, J, Maurer, K (2012). Psychosen – Früherkennung und Frühintervention. Der Praxisleitfaden. Schattauer: Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Häfner, H, Maurer, K, Löffler, W, an der Heiden, W, Hambrecht, M, Schultze-Lutter, F (2003). Modeling the early course of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 29, 325–340.Google Scholar
Heaton, R (1981). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) . Professional Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL.Google Scholar
Juarez-Ramos, V, Rubio, JL, Delpero, C, Mioni, G, Stablum, F, Gomez-Milan, E (2014). Jumping to conclusions bias, BADE and feedback sensitivity in schizophrenia and schizotypy. Consciousness and Cognition 26, 133–144.Google Scholar
Kahn, RS, Keefe, RS (2013). Schizophrenia is a cognitive illness: time for a change in focus. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 1107–1112.Google Scholar
Kircher, TTJ., Koch, K, Stottmeister, F, Durst, V (2007). Metacognition and reflexivity in patients with schizophrenia. Psychopathology 40, 254–260.Google Scholar
Laws, KR, Bhatt, R (2005). False memories and delusional ideation in normal healthy subjects. Personality and Individual Differences 39, 775–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrl, S (2005). Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest MWT-B [Multiple Choice Vocabulary Test: MWT-B, 5th edn. SpittaVerlag: Balingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Levine, E, Jonas, H, Serper, MR (2004). Interpersonal attributional biases in hallucinatory-prone individuals. Schizophrenia Research 69, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lou, HC, Skewes, JC, Thomsen, KRM, Overgaard, M, Lau, HC, Mouridsen, K, Roepstorff, A (2011). Dopaminergic stimulation enhances confidence and accuracy in seeing rapidly presented words. Journal of Vision 11, 1–6.Google Scholar
Mäntylä, T, Rönnlund, M, Kliegel, M (2010). Components of executive functioning in metamemory. Applied Neuropsychology 17, 289–298.Google Scholar
McGorry, PD, Nelson, B, Amminger, GP, Bechdolf, A, Francey, SM, Berger, G, Riecher-Rossler, A, Klosterkotter, J, Ruhrmann, S, Schultze-Lutter, F, Nordentoft, M, Hickie, I, McGuire, P, Berk, M, Chen, EY, Keshavan, MS, Yung, AR (2009). Intervention in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a review and future directions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 70, 1206–1212.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Gläscher, J, Sommer, T, Buechel, C, Braus, DF (2006 a). Neural correlates of memory confidence. Neuroimage 33, 1188–1193.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Göritz, AS, Schafschetzy, M, Van Quaquebeke, N, Peters, MJ, Andreou, C (2015). Subjective competence breeds overconfidence in errors in psychosis. A hubris account of paranoia. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 48, 118–124.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Goritz, AS, Van, QN, Andreou, C, Jungclaussen, D, Peters, MJ (2014 a). Knowledge corruption for visual perception in individuals high on paranoia. Psychiatry Research 215, 700–705.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Kerstan, A, Veckenstedt, R, Randjbar, S, Vitzthum, F, Schmidt, C, Heise, M, Woodward, TS (2011). Further evidence for the efficacy of a metacognitive group training in schizophrenia. Behaviour Research and Therapy 49, 151–157.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Ramdani, N, Klass, H, Andreou, C, Jungclaussen, D, Eifler, S, Englisch, S, Schirmbeck, F, Zink, M (2014b). Overconfidence in incorrect perceptual judgments in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition 1, 165–170.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Vitzthum, F, Randjbar, S, Veckenstedt, R, Woodward, TS (2010). Detecting and defusing cognitive traps: metacognitive intervention in schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 23, 561–569.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS (2004). Plausibility judgement in schizophrenic patients: evidence for a liberal acceptance bias. German Journal of Psychiatry 7, 66–74.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS (2006 a). Metacognitive control over false memories: a key determinant of delusional thinking. Current Psychiatric Report 8, 184–190.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS (2006 b). The contribution of metamemory deficits to schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS, Chen, E (2006 b). Investigation of metamemory dysfunctions in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 81, 247–252.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS, Cuttler, C, Whitman, JC, Watson, JM (2004). False memories in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology 18, 276–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS, Jelinek, L, Klinge, R (2008). Memory and metamemory in schizophrenia: a liberal acceptance account of psychosis. Psychological Medicine 38, 825–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS, Rodriguez-Raecke, R (2006 c). Patients with schizophrenia do not produce more false memories than controls but are more confident in them. Psychological Medicine 36, 659–667.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS, Ruff, CC (2003). Source monitoring and memory confidence in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine 33, 131–139.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Woodward, TS, Whitman, JC, Cuttler, C (2005). Confidence in errors as a possible basis for delusions in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 193, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuechterlein, KH, Green, MF, Kern, RS, Baade, LE, Barch, DM, Cohen, JD, Essock, S, Fenton, WS, Frese, FJ III, Gold, JM, Goldberg, T, Heaton, RK, Keefe, RS, Kraemer, H, Mesholam-Gately, R, Seidman, LJ, Stover, E, Weinberger, DR, Young, AS, Zalcman, S, Marder, SR (2008). The MATRICS consensus cognitive battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. American Journal of Psychiatry 165, 203–213.Google Scholar
Orfei, MD, Spoletini, I, Banfi, G, Caltagirone, C, Spalletta, G (2010). Neuropsychological correlates of cognitive insight in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 178, 51–56.Google Scholar
Peters, MJV., Hauschildt, M, Moritz, S, Jelinek, L (2013). Impact of emotionality on memory and meta-memory in schizophrenia using video sequences. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 44, 77–83.Google Scholar
Rausch, F, Eifler, S, Esser, A, Esslinger, C, Schirmbeck, F, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Zink, M (2013). The early recognition inventory ERIraos detects at risk mental states of psychosis with high sensitivity. Comprehensive Psychiatry 54, 1068–1076.Google Scholar
Rausch, F, Mier, D, Eifler, S, Esslinger, C, Schilling, C, Schirmbeck, F, Englisch, S, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Kirsch, P, Zink, M (2014). Reduced activation in ventral striatum and ventral tegmental area during probabilistic decision-making in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 156, 143–149.Google Scholar
Rausch, F, Mier, D, Eifler, S, Fenske, S, Schilling, C, Schirmbeck, F, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Kirsch, P, Zink, M (2015). Reduced activation in ventral striatum during probabilistic decision-making in ‘at-risk mental state’ patients. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 40, 163–173.Google Scholar
Reitan, RM, Wolfson, D (1993). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation, 2nd edn. Neuropsychology Press: Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
Roediger, HL III, McDermott, KB (1995). Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, 803–814.Google Scholar
Ruhrmann, S, Schultze-Lutter, F, Salokangas, RKR, Heinimaa, M, Linszen, D, Dingemans, P, Birchwood, M, Patterson, P, Juckel, G, Heinz, A, Morrison, A, Lewis, S, von Reventlow, HG, Klosterkötter, J (2010). Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective european prediction of psychosis study. Archives of General Psychiatry 67, 241–251.Google Scholar
Saß, H., Wittchen, H, Zaudig, M (2000). Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer Störungen DSM-IV. Hogrefe: Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Scheyer, R, Reznik, N, Apter, A, Seidman, LJ, Koren, D (2014). Metacognition in non-psychotic help-seeking adolescents: associations with prodromal symptoms, distress and psychosocial deterioration. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and related Sciences 51, 34–43.Google Scholar
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Amorim, P, Janavs, J, Weiller, E, Hergueta, T, Baker, R, Dunbar, GC (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59, 22–33.Google ScholarPubMed
So, SH, Freeman, D, Dunn, G, Kapur, S, Kuipers, E, Bebbington, P, Fowler, D, Garety, PA (2012). Jumping to conclusions, a lack of belief flexibility and delusional conviction in psychosis: a longitudinal investigation of the structure, frequency, and relatedness of reasoning biases. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 121, 129–139.Google Scholar
Souchay, C, Isingrini, M, Clarys, D, Taconnat, L, Eustache, F (2004). Executive functioning and judgment-of-learning versus feeling-of-knowing in older adults. Experimental Aging Research 30, 47–62.Google Scholar
Uchida, T, Matsumoto, K, Ito, F, Ohmuro, N, Miyakoshi, T, Ueno, T, Matsuoka, H (2014). Relationship between cognitive insight and attenuated delusional symptoms in individuals with at-risk mental state. Psychiatry Research 217, 20–24.Google Scholar
Versmissen, D, Myin-Germeys, I, Janssen, I, Franck, N, Georgieff, N, Campo, J, Mengelers, R, van, OJ, Krabbendam, L (2007). Impairment of self-monitoring: part of the endophenotypic risk for psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry (Suppl.) 51, s58–s62.Google Scholar