Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:36:45.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of impairment in instrumental activities of daily living and mild cognitive impairment on time to incident dementia: results of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2010

T. Luck ,
M. Luppa ,
M. C. Angermeyer ,
A. Villringer ,
H.-H. König  and
S. G. Riedel-Heller
T. Luck*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany LIFE Center, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
M. Luppa
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
M. C. Angermeyer
Affiliation:
Center for Public Mental Health, Gösing a. W., Austria Department of Public Health, University of Cagliary, Italy
A. Villringer
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Day Clinic of Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
H.-H. König
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Sociology and Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
S. G. Riedel-Heller
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr T. Luck, Public Health Research Unit, Department of Social Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 55, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Early diagnosis of dementia requires knowledge about associated predictors. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) on the time to an incident dementia diagnosis.

Method

Data were derived from the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA75+), a population-based study of individuals aged ⩾75 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine time to incident dementia. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to determine the impact of MCI and IADL impairment on the time to incident dementia.

Results

In total, 180 (22.0%) of 819 initially dementia-free subjects developed dementia by the end of the study. Mean time to incident dementia was 6.7 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.5–6.9]. MCI combined with IADL impairment was associated with a higher conversion rate to dementia, a shorter time to clinically manifest diagnosis and a lower chance of reversibility to cognitive normal. The highest risk for a shorter time to incident dementia was found for amnestic MCI combined with IADL impairment. The mean time to incident dementia was 3.7 years (95% CI 2.9–4.4) and thus half as long as in subjects without MCI and IADL impairment.

Conclusions

Subjects with MCI and IADL impairment constitute a high-risk population for future dementia. The consideration of both – MCI and IADL impairment – might help to improve the prediction of dementia.

Keywords

Dementiainstrumental activities of daily living (IADL)mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 41 , Issue 5 , May 2011 , pp. 1087 - 1097
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amieva, H, Letenneur, L, Dartigues, JF, Rouch-Leroyer, I, Sourgen, C, D'Alchée-Birée, F, Dib, M, Barberger-Gateau, P, Orgogozo, JM, Fabrigoule, C (2004). Annual rate and predictors of conversion to dementia in subjects presenting mild cognitive impairment criteria defined according to a population-based study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 18, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – DSM-IV-TR (4th edition, text revision). American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Artero, S, Ancelin, ML, Portet, F, Dupuy, A, Berr, C, Dartigues, JF, Tzourio, C, Rouaud, O, Poncet, M, Pasquier, F, Auriacombe, S, Touchon, J, Ritchie, K (2008). Risk profiles for mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia are gender specific. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 79, 979–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Artero, S, Petersen, R, Touchon, J, Ritchie, K (2006). Revised criteria for mild cognitive impairment: validation within a longitudinal population study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 22, 465–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barberger-Gateau, P, Fabrigoule, C, Helmer, C, Rouch, I, Dartigues, JF (1999). Functional impairment in instrumental activities of daily living: an early clinical sign of dementia? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 47, 456–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, CL, Strauss, E, Bunce, D, Hunter, MA, Hultsch, DF (2009). Functional abilities in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Gerontology 55, 570–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busse, A, Bischkopf, J, Riedel-Heller, SG, Angermeyer, MC (2003). Subclassifications for mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and predictive validity. Psychological Medicine 33, 1029–1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busse, A, Hensel, A, Gühne, U, Angermeyer, MC, Riedel-Heller, SG (2006). Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes. Neurology 67, 2176–2185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, DR (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 34, 187–220.Google Scholar
Devanand, DP, Liu, X, Tabert, MH, Pradhaban, G, Cuasay, K, Bell, K, de Leon, MJ, Doty, RL, Stern, Y, Pelton, GH (2008). Combining early markers strongly predicts conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Biological Psychiatry 64, 871–879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, MF, Folstein, ME, McHugh, PR (1975). Mini-Mental-State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Förstl, H, Bickel, H, Frölich, L, Gertz, HJ, Gutzmann, H, Hörr, R, Pantel, J, Schmidt, R, Schönknecht, P, Ulm, K, Werheid, K (2009). MCI-plus: mild cognitive impairment with rapid progression. Part I: prevention and therapy. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 134, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, HR, Belue, K, Sicola, A, Krzywanski, S, Zamrini, E, Harrell, L, Marson, DC (2003). Impaired financial abilities in mild cognitive impairment: a direct assessment approach. Neurology 60, 449–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, CP, Berg, L, Danziger, WL, Coben, LA, Martin, RL (1982). A new clinical scale for staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry 140, 566–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jefferson, AL, Byerly, LK, Vanderhill, S, Lambe, S, Wong, S, Ozonoff, A, Karlawish, JH (2008). Characterization of activities of daily living in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. The American Journal of the Geriatrics Psychiatry 16, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, KR, Lee, KS, Cheong, HK, Eom, JS, Oh, BH, Hong, CH (2009). Characteristic profiles of instrumental activities of daily living in different subtypes of mild cognitive impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 27, 278–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luck, T, Busse, A, Hensel, A, Angermeyer, MC, Riedel-Heller, SG (2008). Mild cognitive impairment and development of dementia [in German]. Psychiatrische Praxis 35, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luck, T, Zaudig, M, Wiese, B, Riedel-Heller, SG (2007). SIDAM: Age- and education-specific reference values for the cognitive test section according to the new CASMIN educational classification [in German]. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und -psychiatrie 20, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérès, K, Chrysostome, V, Fabrigoule, C, Orgogozo, JM, Dartigues, JF, Barberger-Gateau, P (2006). Restriction in complex activities of daily living in MCI: impact on outcome. Neurology 67, 461–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérès, K, Helmer, C, Amieva, H, Orgogozo, JM, Rouch, I, Dartigues, JF, Barberger-Gateau, P (2008). Natural history of decline in instrumental activities of daily living performance over the 10 years preceding the clinical diagnosis of dementia: a prospective population-based study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 56, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, RC (2004). Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. Journal of Internal Medicine 256, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, RC, Doody, R, Kurz, A, Mohs, RC, Morris, JC, Rabins, PV, Ritchie, K, Rossor, M, Thal, L, Winblad, B (2001). Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology 58, 1985–1992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, RC, Smith, GE, Waring, SC, Ivnik, RJ, Tangalos, EG, Kokmen, E (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology 56, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, RC, Thomas, RG, Grundman, M, Bennett, D, Doody, R, Ferris, S, Galasko, D, Jin, S, Kaye, J, Levey, A, Pfeiffer, E, Sano, M, Dyk, CH, van Thal, LJ, for the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group (2005). Vitamin E and donezepil for the treatment of Mild Cognitive Impairment. The New England Journal of Medicine 352, 2379–2388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasquin, SM, Lodder, J, Visser, PJ, Lousberg, R, Verhey, FR (2005). Predictive accuracy of MCI subtypes for Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: a 2-year follow-up study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 19, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riedel-Heller, SG, Busse, A, Aurich, C, Matschinger, H, Angermeyer, MC (2001). Prevalence of dementia according to DSM-III-R and ICD-10: results of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA75+) Part 1. British Journal of Psychiatry 179, 250–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneekloth, U, Potthoff, P (1993). Help and Need of Care of Community Dwelling Elderly: Results of the Representative Research Project. Potentials and Limitations of Independent Living [in German]. Kohlhammer: Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Tabert, MH, Albert, SM, Borukhova-Milov, L, Camacho, Y, Pelton, G, Liu, X, Stern, Y, Devanand, DP (2002). Functional deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment: prediction of AD. Neurology 58, 758–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, CW, Lam, LC, Chiu, HF, Lui, VW (2007). Characteristic profiles of instrumental activities of daily living in Chinese older persons with mild cognitive impairment. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias 22, 211–217.Google ScholarPubMed
Wadley, VG, Okonkwo, O, Crowe, M, Ross-Meadows, LA (2008). Mild cognitive impairment and everyday function: evidence of reduced speed in performing instrumental activities of daily living. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 16, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winblad, B, Palmer, K, Kivipelto, M, Jelic, V, Fratiglioni, L, Wahlund, LO, Nordberg, A, Bäckman, L, Albert, M, Almkvist, O, Arai, H, Basun, H, Blennow, K, de Leon, M, DeCarli, C, Erkinjuntti, T, Giacobini, E, Graff, C, Hardy, J, Jack, C, Jorm, A, Ritchie, K, van Duijn, C, Visser, P, Petersen, RC (2004). Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine 256, 240–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youden, WJ (1950). Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3, 32–35.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaudig, M, Mittelhammer, J, Hiller, W, Pauls, A, Thora, C, Morinigo, A, Mombour, W (1991). SIDAM: A structured interview for the diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer type, multi-infarct dementia and dementias of other aetiology according to ICD-10 and DSM-III-R. Psychological Medicine 21, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed