Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:17:08.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Idiot savant calendrical calculators: maths or memory?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

N. O'Connor  and
B. Hermelin
N. O'Connor*
Affiliation:
MRC Developmental Psychology Project, Institute of Education, London
B. Hermelin
Affiliation:
MRC Developmental Psychology Project, Institute of Education, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr N. O'Connor, MRC Developmental Psychology Project., Institute of Education, 2 Taviton Street, London WCI.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Eight idiot savant calendrical calculators were tested on dates in the years 1963, 1973, 1983, 1986 and 1993. The study was carried out in 1983. Speeds of correct response were minimal in 1983 and increased markedly into the past and the future. The response time increase was matched by an increase in errors. Speeds of response were uncorrelated with measured IQ, but the numbers were insufficient to justify any inference in terms of IQ-independence. Results are interpreted as showing that memory alone is inadequate to explain the calendrical calculating performance of the idiot savant subjects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , November 1984 , pp. 801 - 806
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binet, A. (1894). Psychologie des grandes calculateurs (et de joueurs d'échecs). Hachette: Paris.Google Scholar
Brand, C. (1981). General intelligence and mental speed: their relationship and development. In Intelligence and Learning (ed. Friedman, M. P., Das, J. P. and O'Connor, N.), pp. 589–593. Plenum Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when and how to remember: a problem of meta cognition. In Advances in Instructional Psychology, Vol. 1 (ed. Glaser, R.), pp. 77–165. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
Campione, J. C. & Brown, A. L. (1978). Towards a theory of intelligence. Contribution from research with retarded children. Intelligence 2, 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. A. & Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension. A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review 82, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1981). The nature of intelligence. In Intelligence and Learning (ed. Friedman, M. P., Das, J. P. and O'Connor, N.), pp. 67–85. Plenum Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, A. E. & Hendrickson, D. E. (1978). The biological basis and measurement of intelligence.Paper read at XIXth International Congress of Applied Psychology,Munich.Google Scholar
Hermelin, B. & O'Connor, N. (1983). The idiot savant: flawed genius or clever Hans? Psychological Medicine 13, 479–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, A. L. (1977). Idiot savants: rate of incidence. Perceptual and Motor Skills 44, 161–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, A. L. (1978). Savants: mentally retarded individuals with special skills. In International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, Vol. 9 (ed. Ellis, N. R.), pp. 277–298. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Horwitz, W. A., Kestenbaum, C., Person, E. & Jarvik, L. (1965). Identical twins ‘idiots savants’ calendar calculators. American Journal of Psychiatry 121, 1075–1079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, E. (1976). Varieties of cognitive power. In The Nature of Intelligence (ed. Resnick, L. B.), pp. 237–259. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, N. J.Google Scholar
Hunt, E., Lunneborg, C. & Lewis, J. (1975). What does it mean to be high verbal? Cognitive Psychology 7, 194–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1979). The nature of intelligence and its relation to learning. Journal of Research and Development in Education 12, 79–95.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1981). Reaction time and intelligence. In Intelligence and Learning (ed. Friedman, M. P., Das, J. P. and O'Connor, N.), pp. 39–50. Plenum Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, B., Corkin, S. & Teuber, H. L. (1968). Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: 14 year follow-up study of H.M. Neuropsychologia 6, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettlebeck, T. & Lally, M. (1976). Inspection time and measured intelligence. British Journal of Psychology 67, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, N. & Hermelin, B. (1978). Seeing and Hearing and Space and Time. Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. M. (1981). Adult calendar calculators in a psychiatric OPD: a report of two cases and comparative analysis of abilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 11, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review 84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927). The Abilities of Man. Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar
Sternberg, S. (1966). High speed scanning in human memory. Science 153, 652–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Süllwold, F. (1964). Das unmittelbare Behalten und seine denks-psychologische Bedeutung. Hogrefe: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs 1.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. E. (1950). The Structure of Human Abilities. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar