Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:11:37.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of latent classes in mood and anxiety disorders and their transitions over time: a follow-up study in the adult general population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2024

Margreet ten Have*
Affiliation:
Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Marlous Tuithof
Affiliation:
Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Saskia van Dorsselaer
Affiliation:
Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Neeltje M. Batelaan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Annemarie I. Luik
Affiliation:
Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, the Netherlands Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Jeroen K. Vermunt
Affiliation:
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Margreet ten Have; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Mood and anxiety disorders are heterogeneous conditions with variable course. Knowledge on latent classes and transitions between these classes over time based on longitudinal disorder status information provides insight into clustering of meaningful groups with different disease prognosis.

Methods

Data of all four waves of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 were used, a representative population-based study of adults (mean duration between two successive waves = 3 years; N at T0 = 6646; T1 = 5303; T2 = 4618; T3 = 4007; this results in a total number of data points: 20 574). Presence of eight mood and anxiety DSM-IV disorders was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Latent class analysis and latent Markov modelling were used.

Results

The best fitting model identified four classes: a healthy class (prevalence: 94.1%), depressed-worried class (3.6%; moderate-to-high proportions of mood disorders and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)), fear class (1.8%; moderate-to-high proportions of panic and phobia disorders) and high comorbidity class (0.6%). In longitudinal analyses over a three-year period, the minority of those in the depressed-worried and high comorbidity class persisted in their class over time (36.5% and 38.4%, respectively), whereas the majority in the fear class did (67.3%). Suggestive of recovery is switching to the healthy class, this was 39.7% in the depressed-worried class, 12.5% in the fear class and 7.0% in the high comorbidity class.

Conclusions

People with panic or phobia disorders have a considerably more persistent and chronic disease course than those with depressive disorders including GAD. Consequently, they could especially benefit from longer-term monitoring and disease management.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Researchers have long recognized that mood and anxiety disorder are not isolated disorders, they often co-occur (Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Nelson, McGonagle, Liu, Swartz and Blazer1996; Merikangas et al., Reference Merikangas, Angst, Eaton, Canino, Rubio-Stipec, Wacker and Kupfer1996), share risk factors (Blanco et al., Reference Blanco, Rubio, Wall, Wang, Jiu and Kendler2014; Mathew, Pettit, Lewinsohn, Seeley, & Roberts, Reference Mathew, Pettit, Lewinsohn, Seeley and Roberts2011), and could be seen as a manifestation of the same underlying higher-order (i.e. internalizing) construct (Caspi et al., Reference Caspi, Houts, Belsky, Goldman-Mellor, Harrington, Israel and Moffitt2014; Krueger, Reference Krueger1999; Vollebergh et al., Reference Vollebergh, Iedema, Bijl, De Graaf, Smit and Ormel2001).

However, when analyzing these disorders, researchers often have focused on analyzing atypical samples (e.g. pure cases) or have disregarded comorbidity between disorders (Brown, Campbell, Lehman, Grisham, & Mancill, Reference Brown, Campbell, Lehman, Grisham and Mancill2001; Jacobi et al., Reference Jacobi, Wittchen, Hölting, Höfler, Pfister, Müller and Lieb2004; Kessler, Chiu, Demler, Merikangas, & Walters, Reference Kessler, Chiu, Demler, Merikangas and Walters2005). Moreover, all anxiety disorders are often defined as one group and compared to depressive disorders, while there is controversy surrounding the diagnostic categorization of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Several studies link GAD more closely to depressive disorders than to other anxiety disorders (Kendler, Prescott, Myers, & Neale, Reference Kendler, Prescott, Myers and Neale2003; Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Chiu, Demler, Merikangas and Walters2005; Krueger, Reference Krueger1999; Krueger & Markon, Reference Krueger and Markon2006; Slade & Watson, Reference Slade and Watson2006; Vollebergh et al., Reference Vollebergh, Iedema, Bijl, De Graaf, Smit and Ormel2001), while other studies dispute this view (Beesdo, Pine, Lieb, & Wittchen, Reference Beesdo, Pine, Lieb and Wittchen2010; Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Gruber, Hettema, Hwang, Sampson and Yonkers2008). A data-driven longitudinal study will help inform us how we could cluster people with these disorders most adequately.

Additionally, a growing body of research has found evidence for quite high transition rates over time between depressive and anxiety disorders (Fichter, Quadflieg, Fischer, & Kohlboeck, Reference Fichter, Quadflieg, Fischer and Kohlboeck2010; Merikangas et al., Reference Merikangas, Zhang, Avenevoli, Acharyya, Neuenschwander and Angst2003; Tyrer, Seivewright, & Johnson, Reference Tyrer, Seivewright and Johnson2004). However, few studies examining the longitudinal course of mood and anxiety disorders have incorporated these transitions between disorders. Studies that took co-occurrence and the development of psychopathology beyond the index disorder into account found less favorable disease prognoses. For example, Scholten et al. (Reference Scholten, Batelaan, Penninx, Van Balkom, Smit, Schoevers and Van Oppen2016) showed that the recurrence rate in patients with a pure anxiety disorder more than doubled at 4-year follow-up, from 23.8% to 54.8%, when not only the development of anxiety disorder but also the development of newly arisen depressive disorders were included. In patients with a pure depressive disorder the recurrence rate increased somewhat less steep from 37.6% to 49.7%, when anxiety disorders were also included. Verduijn et al. (Reference Verduijn, Verhoeven, Milaneschi, Schoevers, Van Hemert, Beekman and Penninx2017) showed that the percentage of patients with MDD with a consistently chronic course since baseline (i.e. experiencing a 2-year chronic episode at three successive follow-up assessments) more than tripled at 6-year follow-up, from 4.6% to 14.7%, when a broader definition of disease outcome was applied (from MDD only to including dysthymia, (hypo)mania and anxiety disorders). Similar results have been found in a population-based cohort study by Ten Have et al. (Reference Ten Have, Tuithof, Van Dorsselaer, De Beurs, De Graaf, Batelaan and Penninx2022). They showed that at 9-year follow-up, the rates of a persistent disorder (a disorder at each follow-up assessment) tripled when besides the index disorder closely related mental disorders were included as relevant disease outcome (MDD: from 4.8% to 13.9%; anxiety disorder: from 4.5% to 15.5%). Yet, it remains unanswered how disease prognosis is when data-supported categorizations of these diagnoses are used. Person-centered latent variable approaches can help identify meaningful classes within a heterogeneous population and visualize the transitions between these classes over time.

To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet examined which latent classes exist in the general population based on the occurrence of both mood and anxiety disorders, and how transitions between these classes are over time. The studies that have been done have examined latent trajectories based on depressive or anxiety symptom scores over time between - by researchers-defined - clinical groups at baseline. Within one large clinical cohort study (Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety), the symptom course trajectories differed mainly in severity and/or duration of symptoms when studied separately for patients with a current depressive or anxiety disorder at baseline (Rhebergen et al., Reference Rhebergen, Lamers, Spijker, De Graaf, Beekman and Penninx2012; Spinhoven et al., Reference Spinhoven, Batelaan, Rhebergen, Van Balkom, Schoevers and Penninx2016). In line with these studies, Solis et al. (Reference Solis, Van Hemert, Carlier, Wardenaar, Schoevers, Beekman and Giltay2021) found three latent course trajectories over a nine-year period, varying from chronic, partial recovered and recovered patients, based on mean severity scores of depressive, anxiety, fear, and worry symptoms during follow-up among patients with a current depressive and/or anxiety disorder at baseline. Only one study estimated latent trajectories based on clinical diagnoses among the general population over time (Paksarian et al., Reference Paksarian, Cui, Angst, Ajdacic-Gross, Rössler and Merikangas2016). Three latent course trajectories over three decades were found varying from low, increasing-decreasing and increasing disorder levels, but as all disorders were combined into one category it does not yield insight into comorbidity trajectories within and between mood and anxiety disorders.

This study attempts to fill this research gap by analyzing data from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a nationally representative cohort study among adults. We used latent class analysis (LCA) and latent Markov modelling (LMM) to (i) identify latent classes in the general adult population based on the presence of eight different mood and anxiety disorders, and (ii) examine transitions of these latent classes over time. Moreover, to facilitate understanding and detection of the different classes and transitions, we characterized the latent classes using a series of background characteristics and examined predictors of different course transitions. Based on previous studies (Penninx et al., Reference Penninx, Nolen, Lamers, Zitman, Smit, Spinhoven and Beekman2011; Scholten et al., Reference Scholten, Ten Have, Van Geel, Van Balkom, De Graaf and Batelaan2023; Schopman, Ten Have, Van Balkom, De Graaf, & Batelaan, Reference Schopman, Ten Have, Van Balkom, De Graaf and Batelaan2021; Ten Have et al., Reference Ten Have, De Graaf, Van Dorsselaer, Tuithof, Kleinjan and Penninx2018), we expect indicators of vulnerability and poor health to be predictors of unfavorable latent course transitions.

Methods

Study design

NEMESIS-2 is a population-based cohort study with the aim to investigate prevalence and course of common mental disorders in the Dutch general population aged 18–64. It is based on a multistage, stratified random sampling of households, with one respondent randomly selected from each household. Each respondent was interviewed face-to-face. In the first wave (T0), performed from November 2007 to July 2009, 6646 individuals were interviewed (response rate 65.1%; average duration: 95 min). The sample was broadly nationally representative, although younger subjects and people of non-Dutch origin were somewhat underrepresented (De Graaf, Ten Have, & Van Dorsselaer, Reference De Graaf, Ten Have and Van Dorsselaer2010).

All respondents were approached for follow-up, three years (T1: n = 5303; response rate 80.4%, with those deceased excluded; duration: 84 min), six years (T2: n = 4618; response rate compared to T1 87.8%; duration: 83 min) and nine years (T3: n = 4007; response rate compared to T2 87.7%; duration: 101 min) after baseline. Attrition between T0 and T3 was not significantly associated with any of the assessed 12-month mental disorders at T0 after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics (De Graaf, Van Dorsselaer, Tuithof, & Ten Have, Reference De Graaf, Van Dorsselaer, Tuithof and Ten Have2018). Attrition during follow-up was related to younger age, lower education, unemployment, and non-Dutch origin (De Graaf, Van Dorsselaer, Tuithof, & Ten Have, Reference De Graaf, Van Dorsselaer, Tuithof and Ten Have2013).

The study was approved by a medical ethics committee (the Medical Ethics Review Committee for Institutions on Mental Health Care, METIGG). After receiving information about the study aims, respondents provided written informed consent at each wave. A comprehensive description of the design can be found elsewhere (De Graaf et al., Reference De Graaf, Ten Have and Van Dorsselaer2010).

Measurements

Mental disorders

The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) version 3.0 was used at all waves to assess mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders according to DSM-IV criteria. The CIDI 3.0 is a fully structured lay-administered interview developed by the World Health Organization, which is used worldwide (Kessler & Üstün, Reference Kessler and Üstün2004). Clinical reappraisal interviews showed that it has generally good validity for assessing common mental disorders (Haro et al., Reference Haro, Arbabzadeh-Bouchez, Brugha, De Girolamo, Guyer, Jin and Kessler2006).

At baseline (T0) a lifetime CIDI-version was used; at follow-up (T1−T3) a CIDI-version with as timeframe the period between the previous and the current wave.

For this paper, mood (major depression, dysthymia, bipolar disorder) and anxiety disorders (panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, specific phobia, GAD) in the past 12 months assessed at each wave, were used. Diagnoses were made without the imposition of hierarchical exclusion rules to facilitate the examination of comorbidity, following Vollebergh et al. (Reference Vollebergh, Iedema, Bijl, De Graaf, Smit and Ormel2001) and Caspi et al. (Reference Caspi, Houts, Belsky, Goldman-Mellor, Harrington, Israel and Moffitt2014).

Background characteristics

Sociodemographic, vulnerability, and physical health characteristics were self-reported during the interview and assessed at each wave, unless explicitly stated.

The sociodemographic characteristics used were: sex, age, educational level (only assessed at T0 and T3; T0 information was also used for educational level at T1 and T2), living without a partner, and having no paid job.

As vulnerability characteristics were used: childhood abuse (whether before age 16 one had experienced emotional neglect, psychological abuse or physical abuse on ⩾2 occasions, or sexual abuse on ⩾1 occasion; only assessed at T0; T0 information was used at all follow-up waves), and negative live events, which indicated how many of 10 negative life events were experienced in the past 12 months, such as divorce, unemployment and serious financial difficulties, based on Brugha, Bebbington, Tennant, and Hurry (Reference Brugha, Bebbington, Tennant and Hurry1985).

The physical health characteristics used were: chronic physical disorder (presence of ⩾1 of 17 chronic physical disorders treated or monitored by a medical doctor in the past 12 months, assessed with a standard checklist), body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), excessive drinking (defined as >14/21 drinks weekly for women/men, based on two CIDI questions focusing on the past 12 months: ‘How often did you usually have at least 1 drink?’ and ‘On the days you drank, about how many drinks did you usually have per day?’), smoking (in the past month), and physical exercise (defined as weekly ⩾1 h of physical exercise/sport in the past 12 months; assessed at T1, T2, and T3, missing at T0).

Statistical analysis

To identify different classes in the study population with respect to their mental health status, we used a 2-step analysis in the statistical program Latent GOLD 6.1 (Vermunt & Magidson, Reference Vermunt and Magidson2021). In this analysis data of all four waves were used.

First, latent class models were built based on the eight mood and anxiety disorders in the pooled dataset (Collins & Lanza, Reference Collins and Lanza2009; Magidson & Vermunt, Reference Magidson, Vermunt and Kaplan2004). Models with a different number of latent classes were explored. In the LCA, each wave is considered as a case. There were no missing values on the class indicators, implying the total number of cases in this part of analysis is 20 574. To decrease the likelihood of obtaining local maximum solutions, the number of random start-sets and initial iterations per start-set was increased from the default values of 16 and 50 to 64 and 250, respectively. The assessment of 12-month disorders slightly differed between baseline (identifying symptoms ever in life and then in the past 12 months) and follow-up (identifying symptoms since the previous interview and then in the past 12 months), resulting in higher prevalence rates of the observed disorders at baseline. To account for this difference in measurement (this measurement non-invariance), a variable indicating baseline wave (1) v. follow-up wave (0) was added to the estimated LCA model and specified to have a direct effect on the class indicators (disorders). This way, we allowed the prevalence of disorders within the latent classes to be different for the baseline wave compared to the follow-up waves, and prevented changes in the estimated latent classes proportions across waves resulting from the different measurement of the class indicators. We also checked whether the states differed across all waves or time points. This was not the case, as all bivariate residuals between time (coded as 0,1,2,3) and all eight class indicators were well below 1. To determine the optimal number of latent classes, we used the following statistics: three information criteria (IC) including Bayesian IC, Akaike IC and the corrected Akaike IC with a penalty factor of 3 (for all three IC the smallest value is preferred), the likelihood-ratio goodness-of-fit statistics with bootstrap p values, the bootstrap likelihood ratio (−2 log-likelihood difference) test, and the bivariate residuals (values smaller than 3 or 4 are preferred). We also took into account the interpretability of the models. Dependency in the observations (multiple observations within one respondent) was checked, but the design effect turned out to be negligible (1.07), meaning that there was no need to correct the statistics for dependent observations in this step.

Second, we investigated the association between the encountered latent classes and the background characteristics described above. Bivariate analyses were performed using the data from all waves (missings excluded), with Wald tests accounting for dependencies between waves to determine significant differences in background characteristics between classes (p < 0.05). For this purpose, we used the two-step approach of Bakk and Kuha (Reference Bakk and Kuha2018), which involves estimating a latent class model including background characteristics while fixing the parameters for the class indicators to their estimated values from the first step. We decided to use this approach instead of the more common three-step approach because we obtained several very small latent classes, for which modal class assignment yields huge classification errors. In Latent GOLD, applying the Bakk-Kuha approach involves adding the class-specific log-densities from the first step to the data file and using these in the second step (in a similar manner as one would use the posteriors in a step-three analysis, see: Vermunt, Reference Vermunt2010).

Next, we studied transitions across the identified latent classes over time using a latent Markov model (also referred to as latent transition model; Bartolucci, Farcomeni, & Pennoni, Reference Bartolucci, Farcomeni and Pennoni2013; Collins and Lanza, Reference Collins and Lanza2009), taking into account the dependency in the data by defining respondent number as primary sampling unit. For this purpose, we also used the two-step approach of Bakk and Kuha (Reference Bakk and Kuha2018), that is, by fixing the model parameters for the class indicators to their estimated values from the first step (Di Mari, Oberski, & Vermunt, Reference Di Mari, Oberski and Vermunt2016). In Markov analysis, each respondent is considered a case. All waves of a respondent for which information is available are included. If a wave is missing, it does not provide information about a transition between two consecutive waves. As a result the total number of cases in these analyses is 6646 and the total number of datapoints included in these analyses is 20 574. The latent Markov model was run multiple times with different background characteristics or covariates (missings imputed with the mean), in order to examine whether the observed transition patterns were affected by these covariates. Because these are in principle exploratory analyses, we looked at one covariate at a time. Due to the large number of tests (12 class transitions for each background characteristic/covariate), we used a stricter significant level (p < 0.001). All covariates were time-varying except sex and childhood abuse. The covariates were included at time T to predict latent transitions at time T + 1.

Results

Best fitting model

LCA was used to identify latent classes in the general adult population based on the presence of eight different mood and anxiety disorders in the pooled dataset (total number of data points: 20 574). A series of LCA with one-to five-classes was run. The best fitting model, based on the IC-values, the bootstrap p-values of the likelihood-ratio goodness-of-fit statistics, the bootstrap likelihood-ratio tests, bivariate residuals and interpretability, was a four-class model (see online supplementary table 1).

Description of the four latent classes

The first class (prevalence, 94.1%) was labelled ‘healthy’ because it had the lowest probabilities for all mood and anxiety disorders. The second class (prevalence, 3.6%) was characterized by relatively high proportions of adults with major depressive disorder and moderate-to-high proportions with bipolar disorder, dysthymia and GAD and is therefore further referred to as the ‘depressed-worried’ class. The third class (prevalence, 1.8%) is distinguished as ‘fear’ class due to the relatively moderate-to-high proportions of adults with social phobia, specific phobia, agoraphobia, and panic disorder. Compared to the depressed-worried class, the fear class had lower proportions of adults with mood disorder and GAD. The fourth and high comorbidity class (prevalence, 0.6%) had the highest probabilities for almost all mood and anxiety disorders, indicating high comorbidity between disorders.

The four latent classes significantly differed on all background characteristics or covariates of interest (Table 1). Compared to the healthy class, individuals in the three other classes were more often female, younger, lower educated, more often lived without a partner, had no paid job, more often experienced childhood abuse, reported more negative life events, more often had a chronic physical disorder, were excessive drinkers, more often smoked and were less often physical active. Individuals of the high comorbidity class were further characterized by the highest proportion of lower secondary educated, without a partner, without a paid job and smokers; individuals of the fear class by the highest proportion of females, with a history of childhood abuse, negative life events, a chronic physical disorder, a higher BMI-score and of excessive drinkers.

Table 1. Sociodemographic and other characteristics for the total population and by latent class, in percentages or means

Note 1. Number of cases on: excessive drinking = 20 539; smoking = 20 431; physical exercise = 13 892; childhood abuse = 20 233; negative life events = 20 434; BMI = 20 510; chronic physical disorder = 20 434. For other characteristics, there are no missing data (i.e. N = 20 574 cases).

Note 2. The class indicators or disorders occurred in the past 12 months and were assessed according to DSM-IV criteria. The prevalence rates are based on data of all waves.

Latent transitions of the four latent classes

Table 2 shows the transitions probabilities of these four classes between all two consecutive waves (i.e. from T0 to T1, T1 to T2, and from T2 to T3) taken together, which is a period of three years on average. The mental health of almost all individuals in the healthy class did not change over a three-year period (97.6%) and they remained in this class. Only 1.9% switched to the depressed-worried class, and even lower percentages to the other classes. The mental health of the individuals in the fear class was less stable, but still 67.3% stayed in this class. 14.7% moved to the depressed-worried class, 12.5% to the healthy class and 5.6% transitioned to the high comorbidity class. The majority of individuals in the depressed-worried class and high comorbidity class changed classes over time (63.5% and 61.6%, respectively); over a third remained in their class. The highest percentage in the depressed-worried class moved to the healthy class (39.7%); in the high comorbidity class, it went to the fear class (43.5%). As with the fear class, more than 5% of the depressed-worried class transitioned to the high comorbidity class. Suggestive of recovery is switching to the healthy class, this was 39.7% in the depressed-worried class, 12.5% in the fear class and 7.0% in the high comorbidity class.

Table 2. Latent transitions of the identified latent classes between two consecutive waves over time, based on a Markov model with the Bakk-Kuha adjustment method, in percentages

Note. The transition between classes with the smallest number of people was from class 4 to class 1. This involved less than 10 persons (i.e. 126*0,07).

Predictors of the latent transitions

In subsequent analyses, we investigated predictors of the transitions between latent classes (see Table 3 for a summary and the online supplementary Tables 2a-2d for the statistics). In addition to demographic characteristics, indicators of greater vulnerability or poorer physical health predicted an unfavorable transition. For example, transitions from the healthy class to the depressed-worried class were significantly associated with female sex, younger age, living without a partner, having experienced childhood abuse, more negative life events, chronic physical disorder, and not being physical active; and transitions to the fear class with younger age, living without a partner, more negative life events, excessive drinking, and smoking. Less predictors were found for a favorable transition. For example, transitions from the depressed-worried class to the healthy class were significantly associated with having a paid job and fewer life events; and transitions from the fear class to the healthy class were significantly associated with a lower educational level.

Table 3. Predictors of latent transitions

--: not applicable, this is the reference category for studying transitions between classes.

none: no significant predictors found at p < 0.01.

The predictors associated with an improvement in mental health between classes over time are shown in italics.

All predictors were time-varying and assessed at time T in order to predict latent transitions at time T + 1, except for sex and childhood abuse which were not time dependent.

No significant predictors were found of transitions to the high comorbidity class from any other class, nor from the fear class to the depressed-worried class, and nor from the high comorbidity class to the healthy class.

Discussion

Key findings

This study showed the existence of four different latent classes in the general population based on the occurrence of eight mood and anxiety disorders; a healthy class, depressed-worried class, fear class and high comorbidity class. These classes not only differed in prevalence, baseline characteristics but also in disease transitions. Suggestive of recovery is switching to the healthy class over a three-year period, this was only 39.7% in the depressed-worried class, 12.5% in the fear class and 7.0% in the high comorbidity class. These findings show the chronicity of mood and especially anxiety disorders and stress the need to provide regular monitoring and disease management.

Strengths and limitations

Our population-based study has important strengths, including the large sample of adults, the prospective design, and the use of a diagnostic instrument to assess mood and anxiety disorders at each wave. Yet, some limitations deserve discussion. First, although the sample was representative of the Dutch population on most parameters, people with an insufficient mastery of Dutch, those with no permanent residential address and the institutionalized were underrepresented. Hence, our findings cannot be generalized to these groups, such as the most severely affected depressed and anxious patients. Second, despite the fact that the analyses were based on the full NEMESIS-2 dataset with a total of 20 574 data points, the number of individuals in the three mentally unhealthy classes that switched to another class was not always large enough to study robust predictors of these transitions. This means that non-significant predictors of these transitions can become significant with sufficient power. Third, the latent classes and their transitions over time were based on the presence of mood and anxiety disorders. Disorders can vary in the impairments people experience from them in their daily life. This means that a persistent or chronic disease course not always is the most serious course; after all, a short illness duration can be accompanied by severe role limitations.

Discussion of research findings

This study identified four latent classes in the general adult population based on the presence of eight mood and anxiety disorders: a healthy class (prevalence: 94.1%), depressed-worried class (3.6%; moderate-to-high proportions with all mood disorders and GAD), fear class (1.8%; moderate-to-high proportions with panic disorder and all phobia disorders) and high comorbidity class (0.6%). The prevalence of these latent classes did not differ between the measurement waves, indicating robust classes over time.

The present study found that the prevalence of GAD was lower in the anxiety class compared to the depressed worried class and the high comorbidity class. This is in line with several previous studies (Kendler et al., Reference Kendler, Prescott, Myers and Neale2003; Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Chiu, Demler, Merikangas and Walters2005; Krueger, Reference Krueger1999; Krueger & Markon, Reference Krueger and Markon2006; Slade & Watson, Reference Slade and Watson2006; Vollebergh et al., Reference Vollebergh, Iedema, Bijl, De Graaf, Smit and Ormel2001) that have suggested a closer link of GAD to depressive disorders than to other anxiety disorders. Other studies (Beesdo et al., Reference Beesdo, Pine, Lieb and Wittchen2010; Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Gruber, Hettema, Hwang, Sampson and Yonkers2008) dispute this view although they did not rely on latent variable approaches. More work is needed to determine whether a distinction between panic disorders and phobias on the one hand and mood disorders including GAD on the other hand is helpful in future research when assessing mechanisms, course and treatment.

Compared to all other latent classes, individuals in the fear class were characterized by the highest proportion of females, with a history of childhood abuse, negative life events, a chronic physical disorder, a higher BMI-score and of excessive drinkers. They also had higher percentages of physically active individuals and those living with a partner compared to those in the depressed-worried class. That these two latent classes differed with respect to baseline demographic, vulnerability and physical health characteristics adds to previous findings that both classes are different manifestations of the same underlying higher-order (i.e. internalizing) disease construct (e.g. Vollebergh et al., Reference Vollebergh, Iedema, Bijl, De Graaf, Smit and Ormel2001).

Individuals of the high comorbidity class were characterized by the highest proportion of smokers and those with a lack of resources (lower educated, living without a partner, unemployed). Although these adverse economic and social conditions did not play a role in the transition to a healthier class, these factors may be particularly important to consider when treating the most affected patients.

Persistency (i.e. remaining in the same class over time) and chronicity (i.e. staying in one of the classes with moderate-to-high proportions of disorders over time) were different between the latent classes over time. We found that people in the fear class had a more persistent and chronic disease course than those in the depressed-worried class. This contrasts with previous clinical and population-based studies that show better or similar course trajectories of anxiety disorders (often including GAD but excluding specific phobia) compared to depressive disorders (Penninx et al., Reference Penninx, Nolen, Lamers, Zitman, Smit, Spinhoven and Beekman2011; Ten Have et al., Reference Ten Have, Tuithof, Van Dorsselaer, De Beurs, De Graaf, Batelaan and Penninx2022). An explanation for this may be the composition of the groups as one large clinical cohort study found that remittance rates were more favorable for GAD than for phobias (Hendriks, Spijker, Licht, Beekman, & Penninx, Reference Hendriks, Spijker, Licht, Beekman and Penninx2013). Additionally, several other psychiatric epidemiological studies found that specific phobias often have a more persistent course than other anxiety disorders such as GAD, based on the 12-month to lifetime prevalence ratios for anxiety disorders (De Graaf, Ten Have, Van Gool, & Van Dorsselaer, Reference De Graaf, Ten Have, Van Gool and Van Dorsselaer2012; Kessler, Ruscio, Shear, & Wittchen, Reference Kessler, Ruscio, Shear and Wittchen2010; Kringlen, Torgersen, & Cramer, Reference Kringlen, Torgersen and Cramer2001). A possible explanation for this is that people with specific phobia are less often impaired by their disorder (Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Chiu, Demler, Merikangas and Walters2005; Ten Have, Nuyen, Beekman, & De Graaf, Reference Ten Have, Nuyen, Beekman and De Graaf2013b), and are less likely to seek professional help (Ten Have, De Graaf, Van Dorsselaer, & Beekman, Reference Ten Have, De Graaf, Van Dorsselaer and Beekman2013a; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Berglund, Olfson, Pincus, Wells and Kessler2005), causing the symptoms to persist.

The finding that the majority of the people in the classes with moderate-to-high proportions of disorders did not switch to the healthy class over a three-year period, shows the chronicity of mood and anxiety disorders. Outpatient mental health services generally focuses on treating the mental disorder and less on preventing relapse and chronicity of the disorder (Hermens, Muntingh, Franx, Van Splunteren, & Nuyen, Reference Hermens, Muntingh, Franx, Van Splunteren and Nuyen2014; Roy-Byrne, Wagner, & Schraufnagel, Reference Roy-Byrne, Wagner and Schraufnagel2005). The present findings have implications for the way mental health care ideally is organized and the extent regular monitoring, relapse prevention, easy access to consultation, rapidly scaling up care when needed, and maintenance treatment are provided. Clinicians should consider interventions aimed at treating mood and anxiety disorder as chronic and non-isolated disorders by more systematically incorporating regular monitoring and relapse prevention strategies, such as increasing patients’ awareness of signs of relapse, making a relapse prevention plan and agreeing on the steps to be taken in case of recurrence. Besides, treatment programs for chronic or treatment-resistant outpatients should be implemented, and disease management may be better adapted to serve patients with chronic course trajectories.

On the other hand, based on previous population-based studies reporting a treatment gap or delays in help-seeking behavior (Iza et al., Reference Iza, Olfson, Vermes, Hoffer, Wang and Blanco2013; Mekonen, Chan, Connor, Hides, & Leung, Reference Mekonen, Chan, Connor, Hides and Leung2021; Ten Have et al., Reference Ten Have, Nuyen, Beekman and De Graaf2013b; Reference Ten Have, Tuithof, Van Dorsselaer, De Beurs, De Graaf, Batelaan and Penninx2022; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Berglund, Olfson, Pincus, Wells and Kessler2005), a fairly large proportion of the individuals in the classes with moderate-to-high proportions of disorders might not have sought professional help for their mental disorder. For these people, public awareness on the benefits of timely treatment for mood and anxiety disorder should be raised.

In addition to sociodemographic characteristics, indicators of vulnerability and poor health were found to be predictors of unfavorable latent course transitions. We found more predictors for developing mood and/or anxiety disorders than for its course (i.e. persistence or chronicity of disorders). For example, female sex played a role in the transition from the healthy class to the depressed-worried class, but not the other way around. This finding emphasizes that predictors for disease onset and course may differ.

In conclusion, we found four latent classes: a healthy class, depressed-worried class (mood disorders including GAD), fear class (panic disorder and all phobia disorders) and high comorbidity class. The fear class was more persistent and chronic in nature compared to the depressed-worried class. Our findings suggest that anxiety and depression should be considered jointly in research and clinical practice, particularly as a substantial percentage of people transfers from depressed-worried to fear or vice versa, suggesting that both chronicity and persistency should be taken into account. Moreover, combining the anxiety disorders into one group seems insufficient, as these disorders may group beyond the category of anxiety disorders. This in turn may hamper our understanding of these diseased cases when it comes to their course and effects of treatment.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724001740.

Funding statement

The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2) is conducted by the Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute) in Utrecht. Financial support has been received from the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, with supplementary support from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) and the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) investigators. The funding sources had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Competing interests

None.

References

Bakk, Z., & Kuha, J. (2018). Two-step estimation of models between latent classes and external variables. Psychometrika, 83, 871892. doi:10.1007/s11336-017-9592-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartolucci, F., Farcomeni, A., & Pennoni, F. (2013). Latent Markov models for longitudinal data. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi:10.1201/b13246Google Scholar
Beesdo, K., Pine, D. S., Lieb, R., & Wittchen, H. U. (2010). Incidence and risk patterns of anxiety and depressive disorders and categorization of generalized anxiety disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 4757. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanco, C., Rubio, J., Wall, M., Wang, S., Jiu, C. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2014). Risk factors for anxiety disorders: Common and specific effects in a national sample. Depression and Anxiety, 31, 756764. doi:10.1002/da.22247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, T. A., Campbell, L. A., Lehman, C. L., Grisham, J. R., & Mancill, R. B. (2001). Current and lifetime comorbidity of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders in a large clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 585599. doi:10.1037//0021-843x.110.4.585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugha, T., Bebbington, P., Tennant, C., & Hurry, J. (1985). The list of threatening experiences: A subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychological Medicine, 15, 189194. doi:10.1017/s003329170002105xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., … Moffitt, T. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119137. doi:10.1177/2167702613497473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2009). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470567333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, R., Ten Have, M., & Van Dorsselaer, S. (2010). The Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study-2 (NEMESIS-2): Design and methods. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 19, 125141. doi:10.1002/mpr.317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Graaf, R. d., Ten Have, M., Van Gool, C., & Van Dorsselaer, S. (2012). Prevalence of mental disorders and trends from 1996 to 2009. Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47, 203213. doi:10.1007/s00127-010-0334-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Graaf, R., Van Dorsselaer, S., Tuithof, M., & Ten Have, M. (2013). Sociodemographic and psychiatric predictors of attrition in a prospective psychiatric epidemiological study among the general population. Result of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54, 11311139. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graaf, R., Van Dorsselaer, S., Tuithof, M., & Ten Have, M. (2018). Sociodemographic and psychiatric predictors of attrition in the third follow-up of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2). Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut.Google Scholar
Di Mari, R., Oberski, D. L., & Vermunt, J. K. (2016). Bias-adjusted three-step latent Markov modeling with covariates. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 649660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichter, M. M., Quadflieg, N., Fischer, U. C., & Kohlboeck, G. (2010). Twenty-five-year course and outcome in anxiety and depression in the Upper Bavarian Longitudinal Community Study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 122, 7585. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01512.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haro, J. M., Arbabzadeh-Bouchez, S., Brugha, T. S., De Girolamo, G., Guyer, M. E., Jin, R., & Kessler, R. C. (2006). Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 15, 167180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendriks, S. M., Spijker, J., Licht, C. M., Beekman, A. T., & Penninx, B. W. (2013). Two-year course of anxiety disorders: Different across disorders or dimensions? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 128, 212221. doi:10.1111/acps.12024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermens, M. L., Muntingh, A., Franx, G., Van Splunteren, P. T., & Nuyen, J. (2014). Stepped care for depression is easy to recommend, but harder to implement: Results of an explorative study within primary care in the Netherlands. BMC Family Practice, 15, 5. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-15-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iza, M., Olfson, M., Vermes, D., Hoffer, M., Wang, S., & Blanco, C. (2013). Probability and predictors of first treatment contact for anxiety disorders in the United States: Analysis of data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74, 10931100. doi:10.4088/JCP.13m08361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, F., Wittchen, H.-U., Hölting, C., Höfler, M., Pfister, H., Müller, N., & Lieb, R. (2004). Prevalence, comorbidity and correlates of mental disorders in the general population: Results from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey (GHS). Psychological Medicine, 34, 597611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S., Prescott, C. A., Myers, J., & Neale, M. C. (2003). The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 929937. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.929CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 617627. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617., Erratum in: Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 709. Merikangas, K.R. [added].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, R. C., Gruber, M., Hettema, J. M., Hwang, I., Sampson, N., & Yonkers, K. A. (2008). Co-morbid major depression and generalized anxiety disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 38, 365374. doi:10.1017/S0033291707002012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, R. C., Nelson, C. B., McGonagle, K. A., Liu, J., Swartz, M., & Blazer, D. G. (1996). Comorbidity of DSM-III-R major depressive disorder in the general population: Results from the US National Comorbidity Survey. British Journal of Psychiatry Suppl, 30, 1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Ruscio, A. M., Shear, K., & Wittchen, H. U. (2010). Epidemiology of anxiety disorders. Current Topics Behavioral Neurosciences, 2, 2135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, R. C., & Üstün, T. B. (2004). The World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13, 93121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kringlen, E., Torgersen, S., & Cramer, V. (2001). A Norwegian psychiatric epidemiological study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 10911098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. F. (1999). The structure of common mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 921926. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.921CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111133. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J.K. (2004). Latent class models. In Kaplan, D. (Ed.), The sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences, Chapter 10, (pp. 175198). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mathew, A. R., Pettit, J. W., Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., & Roberts, R. E. (2011). Co-morbidity between major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders: Shared etiology or direct causation? Psychological Medicine, 41, 20232034. doi:10.1017/S0033291711000407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mekonen, T., Chan, G. C. K., Connor, J. P., Hides, L., & Leung, J. (2021). Estimating the global treatment rates for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 295, 12341242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merikangas, K. R., Angst, J., Eaton, W., Canino, G., Rubio-Stipec, M., Wacker, H., … Kupfer, D. J. (1996). Comorbidity and boundaries of affective disorders with anxiety disorders and substance misuse: Results of an international task force. British Journal of Psychiatry Suppl, 30, 5867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merikangas, K. R., Zhang, H., Avenevoli, S., Acharyya, S., Neuenschwander, M., & Angst, J. (2003). Longitudinal trajectories of depression and anxiety in a prospective community study: The Zurich Cohort Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 9931000. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paksarian, D., Cui, L., Angst, J., Ajdacic-Gross, V., Rössler, W., & Merikangas, K. R. (2016). Latent trajectories of common mental health disorder risk across 3 decades of adulthood in a population-based cohort. JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 10231031. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penninx, B. W., Nolen, W. A., Lamers, F., Zitman, F. G., Smit, J. H., Spinhoven, P., … Beekman, A. T. (2011). Two-year course of depressive and anxiety disorders: Results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Journal of Affective Disorders, 133, 7685. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhebergen, D., Lamers, F., Spijker, J., De Graaf, R., Beekman, A. T., & Penninx, B. W. (2012). Course trajectories of unipolar depressive disorders identified by latent class growth analysis. Psychological Medicine, 42, 13831396. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002509CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy-Byrne, P. P., Wagner, A. W., & Schraufnagel, T. J. (2005). Understanding and treating panic disorder in the primary care setting. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(suppl. 4), 1622.Google ScholarPubMed
Scholten, W., Ten Have, M., Van Geel, C., Van Balkom, A., De Graaf, R., & Batelaan, N. (2023). Recurrence of anxiety disorders and its predictors in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 53, 13341342. doi:10.1017/S0033291721002877CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholten, W. D., Batelaan, N. M., Penninx, B. W., Van Balkom, A. J., Smit, J. H., Schoevers, R. A., & Van Oppen, P. (2016). Diagnostic instability of recurrence and the impact on recurrence rates in depressive and anxiety disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 195, 185190. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schopman, S. M. E., Ten Have, M., Van Balkom, A. J. L. M., De Graaf, R., & Batelaan, N. M. (2021). Course trajectories of anxiety disorders: Results from 6- year follow-up in a general population study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 55, 10491057. doi:10.1177/00048674211009625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slade, T., & Watson, D. (2006). The structure of common DSM-IV and ICD-10 mental disorders in the Australian general population. Psychological Medicine, 36, 15931600. doi:10.1017/S0033291706008452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solis, E. C., Van Hemert, A. M., Carlier, I. V. E., Wardenaar, K. J., Schoevers, R. A., Beekman, A. T. F., … Giltay, E. J. (2021). The 9-year clinical course of depressive and anxiety disorders: New NESDA findings. Journal of Affective Disorders, 295, 12691279. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinhoven, P., Batelaan, N., Rhebergen, D., Van Balkom, A., Schoevers, R., & Penninx, B. W. (2016). Prediction of 6-yr symptom course trajectories of anxiety disorders by diagnostic, clinical and psychological variables. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 44, 92101. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ten Have, M., De Graaf, R., Van Dorsselaer, S., & Beekman, A. (2013a). Lifetime treatment contact and delay in treatment seeking after first onset of a mental disorder. Psychiatric Servives, 64, 981989. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201200454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ten Have, M., De Graaf, R., Van Dorsselaer, S., Tuithof, M., Kleinjan, M., & Penninx, B. W. J. H. (2018). Recurrence and chronicity of major depressive disorder and their risk indicators in a population cohort. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 137, 503515. doi:10.1111/acps.12874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Have, M., Nuyen, J., Beekman, A., & De Graaf, R. (2013b). Common mental disorder severity and its association with treatment contact and treatment intensity for mental health problems. Psychological Medicine, 43, 22032213. doi:10.1017/S0033291713000135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ten Have, M., Tuithof, M., Van Dorsselaer, S., De Beurs, D., De Graaf, R., Batelaan, N. M., & Penninx, B. W. J. H. (2022). How chronic are depressive and anxiety disorders? 9–year general population study using narrow and broad course outcomes. Journal of Affective Disorders, 317, 149155. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.083CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyrer, P., Seivewright, H., & Johnson, T. (2004). The Nottingham Study of Neurotic Disorder: Predictors of 12-year outcome of dysthymic, panic and generalized anxiety disorder. Psychological Medicine, 34, 13851394. doi:10.1017/s0033291704002569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verduijn, J., Verhoeven, J. E., Milaneschi, Y., Schoevers, R. A., Van Hemert, A. M., Beekman, A. T. F., & Penninx, B. W. J. H. (2017). Reconsidering the prognosis of major depressive disorder across diagnostic boundaries: Full recovery is the exception rather than the rule. BMC Medicine, 15, 215. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0972-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2021). Upgrade manual for latent GOLD basic, advanced/syntax, and choice version 6.0. Arlington, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.Google Scholar
Vollebergh, W. A., Iedema, J., Bijl, R. V., De Graaf, R., Smit, F., & Ormel, J. (2001). The structure and stability of common mental disorders: The NEMESIS study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 597603. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, P. S., Berglund, P., Olfson, M., Pincus, H. A., Wells, K. B., & Kessler, R. C. (2005). Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 603613. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.603CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Sociodemographic and other characteristics for the total population and by latent class, in percentages or means

Figure 1

Table 2. Latent transitions of the identified latent classes between two consecutive waves over time, based on a Markov model with the Bakk-Kuha adjustment method, in percentages

Figure 2

Table 3. Predictors of latent transitions

Supplementary material: File

ten Have et al. supplementary material

ten Have et al. supplementary material
Download ten Have et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.9 KB