Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:37:23.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The General Health Questionnaire: how many items are really necessary in population surveys?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

B. K. Jacobsen ,
T. Hasvold ,
G. Høyer  and
V. Hansen
B. K. Jacobsen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway
T. Hasvold
Affiliation:
Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway
G. Høyer
Affiliation:
Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway
V. Hansen
Affiliation:
Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Bjarne K. Jacobsen, Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

This paper seeks to investigate whether only a few questions selected from the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) may be used to measure the degree of mental distress in population surveys. Data from 2112 men and women, 18 to 70 years old from two cross-sectional studies conducted in northern Norway and the island of Spitzbergen in the Arctic, were used. Correlation analysis of Likert scores from a 20-item version of GHQ (GHQ-20) with Likert scores based on four and six items selected by multiple regression analysis or by competent physicians was performed. The correlation coefficients between the scores from the subsets of four items and the full GHQ-20 questionnaire were high (greater than 0·80) in all examined subgroups of the populations. Increasing the number of questions from four to six only marginally increased the correlation coefficients. Thus, a simple linear sum of Likert scores based on a few GHQ items can be used to measure the degree of mental distress in population surveys.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , September 1995 , pp. 957 - 961
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berwick, D. M., Murphy, J. M., Goldman, P. A., Ware, J. E. Jr., Barsky, A. J. & Weinstein, M. C. (1991). Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Medical Care 29, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. & Williams, P. (1988). A Users Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson: Windsor.Google Scholar
Hansen, V. & Jacobsen, B. K. (1989). Mental distress and social conditions and lifestyle in northern Norway. British Medical Journal 299, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, E., Wasson, J. H., Kirk, J. W., Keller, A., Clark, D., Dietrich, A., Stewart, A. & Zubkoff, M. (1987). Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. Journal of Chronic Diseases 40 (suppl. 1), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute Inc. (1987). SAS Users Guide: Basics. 5th Version. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, New York.Google Scholar
Tambs, K. & Moum, T. (1993). How well can a few questionnaire items indicate anxiety and depression? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 87, 364–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed