Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:59:06.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foulds’ hierarchical model of psychiatric illness in a Dutch cohort: a re-evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

A. De Jong ,
R. Giel ,
E. G. Lindeboom ,
C. J. Slooff  and
D. Wiersma
A. De Jong*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychiatry, State University of Groningen, The Netherlands
R. Giel
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychiatry, State University of Groningen, The Netherlands
E. G. Lindeboom
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychiatry, State University of Groningen, The Netherlands
C. J. Slooff
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychiatry, State University of Groningen, The Netherlands
D. Wiersma
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychiatry, State University of Groningen, The Netherlands
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr A. de Jong, Academisch Ziekenhuis, Sociale Psychiatrie, Oostersingel 59, 9713 EZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

In order to evaluate Foulds' hierarchical model of psychiatric illness, a study was carried out using data from a 3-year follow-up of patients suffering from functional non-affective psychoses. Of the 177 Present State Examinations carried out 86% yielded symptom patterns compatible with the model. It was shown that failures to fit the hierarchy can be explained either by measurement error or by the masking of major symptoms by the simultaneous presence of minor ones. A one-dimensional scale to measure the severity of psychiatric illness was constructed. Patients' scores were compared with ratings on the Index of Definition and the diagnosis of current mental state. The results of these comparisons were considered to be supportive validatory evidence. Some of the implications of the model and the data are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , August 1984 , pp. 647 - 654
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bagshaw, V. E. (1977). A replication study of Foulds' and Bedford's hierarchical model of depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 131, 53–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagshaw, V. E. & McPherson, F. M. (1978). The applicability of the Foulds and Bedford hierarchy model to mania and hypomania. British Journal of Psychiatry 132, 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, A. & Foulds, G. A. (1977). Validation of the Delusions–Symptoms–States Inventory. British Journal of Medical Psychology 50, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, A. & Presley, A. S. (1978). Symptoms patterns among chronic schizophrenic in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry 133, 176–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clare, A. (1980). Psychiatry in Dissent. Tavistock: London.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. E. (1980). The description and classification of social disability by means of a taxonomic hierarchy. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia Suppl. 285, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulds, G. A. (1965). Personality and Personal Illness. Tavistock: London.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. (1976). The Hierarchical Nature of Personal Illness. Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A. & Bedford, A. (1975). Hierarchy of classes of personal illness. Psychological Medicine 5, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giel, R. (1982). Waarom een Psychiatrische Diagnose? (Why a Psychiatric Diagnosis?) Stafleu: Alphen aan de Rijn.Google Scholar
Giel, R., Sauër, H. C., Slooff, C. J. & Wiersma, D. (1980). Over de epidemiologie van functionele psychosen en invaliditeit. (On the epidemiology of functional non-affective psychoses and disablement.) Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 22, 710–722.Google Scholar
Gilleard, E. (1983). A cross-cultural investigation of Foulds' hierarchy model of psychiatric illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 142, 518–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablensky, A., Schwarz, R. & Tomov, T. (1980). WHO collaborative study on impairments and disabilities associated with schizophrenic disorders. A preliminary communication: objectives and methods. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 62, Suppl. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, A. de, Giel, R., Slooff, C. J. & Wiersma, D. (1983). Sociale beperkingen ten gevolge van functionele psychosen. I. Een ontwcrp voor een model voor de ontwikkeling van sociale beperkingen. (Social disabilities resulting from functional psychosis. I. A design of a model for the development of social disabilities.) Tijdschrift voor Sociale Gezondheidszorg 61, 78–85.Google Scholar
McPherson, F. M., Antram, M. C., Bagshaw, V. E. & Carmichael, S. K. (1977). A test of the hierachical model of personal illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 131, 56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokken, R. J. (1971). A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. Mouton: The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D. H. (1975). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (second edn). McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Niemöller, B., Schuur, W. H. van & Stokman, F. N. (1980). Stochastic cumulative scaling. Statistical Appendix (STAP), User's manual. Part 1 of Volume 4. Technisch Centrum FSW: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Slooff, C. J., Mulder-Hajonides van der Meulen, W. R. E. H. & Hoofdakker, R. H. van den (1983 a). De Nederlandse vertaling van de Present State Examination. I. Betrouwbaarheidsaspecten. (The Dutch translation of the Present State Examination. I. Aspects of reliability.) Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 25, 151–163.Google Scholar
Slooff, C. J., Mulder-Hajonides van der Meulen, W. R. E. H. & Hoofdakker, R. H. van den (1983 b). De Nederlandse vertaling van de Present State Examination. II. De relatie tussen CATEGO-klassen en de categorien van de ICD. (The Dutch translation of the Present State Examination. II. The relation between CATEGO-classes and categories from the ICD.) Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie 25, 280–289.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L. & Endicott, J. (1968). DIAGNO: a computer program for psychiatric diagnosis utilizing the differential diagnostic procedure. Archives of General Psychiatry 18, 746–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturt, E. (1981). Hierarchical patterns in the distribution of psychiatric symptoms. Psychological Medicine 11, 783–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surtees, P. G. & Kendell, R. E. (1979). The hierarchy model of psychiatric symptomatology: an investigation based on Present State Examination ratings. British Journal of Psychiatry 135, 438–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiersma, D., Giel, R., Jong, A. de & Slooff, C. J. (1983). Social class and schizophrenia in a Dutch cohort. Psychological Medicine 13, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K. (1978). Reasoning About Madness. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K. & Sturt, E. (1978). The PSE-1D-CATEGO System, Supplementary Manual. Institute of Psychiatry: London (mimeograph).Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974). Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Mann, S. A., Leff, J. P. & Nixon, J. M. (1978). The concept of a ‘case’ in psychiatric population surveys. Psychological Medicine 8, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed