Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:58:25.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The factor structure of the GHQ: a scaled version for a hopital's general practice service in Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

M. E. Medina-Mora ,
G. P. Padilla ,
C. Campillo-Serrano ,
C. C. Mas ,
M. Ezbán ,
J. Caraveo  and
J. Corona
M. E. Medina-Mora*
Affiliation:
Research Department of Epidemiològical and Social Sciences, Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico
G. P. Padilla
Affiliation:
Research Department of Epidemiològical and Social Sciences, Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico
C. Campillo-Serrano
Affiliation:
Research Department of Epidemiològical and Social Sciences, Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico
C. C. Mas
Affiliation:
Research Department of Epidemiològical and Social Sciences, Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico
M. Ezbán
Affiliation:
Research Department of Epidemiològical and Social Sciences, Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico
J. Caraveo
Affiliation:
Research Department of Epidemiològical and Social Sciences, Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico
J. Corona
Affiliation:
Research Department of Epidemiològical and Social Sciences, Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, Mexico
*
1Address for correspondence: Ma Elena Medina-Mora, Research Department of Epidemiological and Social Sciences, Instituto Mexicano de Psiquiatria, (Antiguo Camino a Xochimilco 101), Mexico 22, D.F.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

This paper reports the factor structure of the symptoms comprising the GHQ when it is administered in the general practiāe service of a hospital. Two shorter versions are proposed: one with 6 scales and 30 items, and the other with 4 scales and 28 items. The latter is compared with the 28-item English version. Preliminary data concerning the validity of the scales are presented. In a comparison of the screening potentiality of the 60- and 28-item versions, no significant differences were found.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 1983 , pp. 355 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campillo-Serrano, C., Medina-Mora, M. E., Martínez, L. P. & Caraveo, A. J. (1980). Prueba de un cuestionario (GHQ) para Ia detección de possibles casos psiquiátricos en una comunidad mexicana. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Finlay-Jones, R. A. & Murphy, E. (1979). Severity of psychiatric disorder and the 30 item General Health Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 609–616.Google Scholar
Finlay-Jones, R. A., Brown, G. W., Duncan-Jones, P., Harris, T., Murphy, E. & Prudo, R. (1980). Depression and anxiety in the community: replicating the diagnosis of a case. Psychological Medicine 10, 445–454.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine 9, 139–145.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., Cooper, B., Eastwood, M. R., Kedward, H. A. & Shepherd, M. (1970). A standardized psychiatric interview for use in community surveys. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine 24 (1), 18–23.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., Kay, C. & Thompson, L. (1976a). Psychiatric morbidity in general practice and the community. Psychological Medicine 6, 565–569.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., Rickels, K., Downing, R. & Hesbacher, P. (1976b). A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. British Journal of Psychiatry 129, 61–67.Google Scholar
Muāoz, P. E., Vázquez, J. L., Pastrana, E., Rodríguez, F. & Oneca, C. (1978). Study of the validity of Goldberg's 60-item GHQ in its Spanish version. Social Psychiatry 13 (2), 99–104.Google Scholar
Tarnopolsky, A., Hand, D. J., McLean, E. K., Roberts, H. & Wiggins, R. D. (1979). Validity and uses of a screening questionnaire (GHQ) in the community. British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 505–515.Google Scholar
Tennant, C. (1977). A valid index of psychological impairment in Australian populations. Medical Journal of Australia ii, 392–394.Google Scholar