Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:21:03.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing an international scoring system for a consensus-based social cognition measure: MSCEIT-managing emotions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2017

G. S. Hellemann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA VISN 22 Mental Health Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Los Angeles CA, USA
M. F. Green*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA VISN 22 Mental Health Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Los Angeles CA, USA VA Research Enhancement Award Program (REAP) on Enhancing Community Integration for Homeless Veterans, Los Angeles CA, USA
R. S. Kern
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA VISN 22 Mental Health Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Los Angeles CA, USA VA Research Enhancement Award Program (REAP) on Enhancing Community Integration for Homeless Veterans, Los Angeles CA, USA
G. Sitarenios
Affiliation:
Multi-Health Systems Inc., Toronto, Canada
K. H. Nuechterlein
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
*
*Address for corresponding author: M. F. Green, Ph.D., UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, 760 Westwood Plaza, 27-462, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Background

Measures of social cognition are increasingly being applied to psychopathology, including studies of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Tests of social cognition present unique challenges for international adaptations. The Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, Managing Emotions Branch (MSCEIT-ME) is a commonly-used social cognition test that involves the evaluation of social scenarios presented in vignettes.

Method

This paper presents evaluations of translations of this test in six different languages based on representative samples from the relevant countries. The goal was to identify items from the MSCEIT-ME that show different response patterns across countries using indices of discrepancy and content validity criteria. An international version of the MSCEIT-ME scoring was developed that excludes items that showed undesirable properties across countries.

Results

We then confirmed that this new version had better performance (i.e. less discrepancy across regions) in international samples than the version based on the original norms. Additionally, it provides scores that are comparable to ratings based on local norms.

Conclusions

This paper shows that it is possible to adapt complex social cognitive tasks so they can provide valid data across different cultural contexts.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan, RW, Davis, M, Goff, D, Green, MF, Keefe, RSE, Leon, AC, Nuechterlein, KH, Laughren, T, Levin, R, Stover, E, Fenton, W, Marder, SR (2005). A summary of the FDA-NIMH-MATRICS workshop on clinical trial design for neurocognitive drugs for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 31, 519.Google Scholar
Davis, MC, Lee, J, Horan, WP, Clarke, AD, McGee, MR, Green, MF, Marder, SR (2013). Effects of single dose intranasal oxytocin on social cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 147, 393397.Google Scholar
Fett, AK, Viechtbauer, W, Dominguez, MD, Penn, DL, van Os, J, Krabbendam, L (2011). The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35, 573588.Google Scholar
Fischer-Shofty, M, Brune, M, Ebert, A, Shefet, D, Levkovitz, Y, Shamay-Tsoory, SG (2013). Improving social perception in schizophrenia: the role of oxytocin. Schizophrenia Research 146, 357362.Google Scholar
Green, MF, Harris, JG, Nuechterlein, KH (2014). The MATRICS consensus cognitive battery: what we know 6 years later. American Journal of Psychiatry 171, 11511154.Google Scholar
Green, MF, Nuechterlein, KH, Gold, JM, Barch, DM, Cohen, J, Essock, S, Fenton, WS, Frese, F, Goldberg, TE, Heaton, RK, Keefe, RSE, Kern, RS, Kraemer, H, Stover, E, Weinberger, DR, Zalcman, S, Marder, SR (2004). Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: The NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria. Biological Psychiatry 56, 301307.Google Scholar
Hambleton, RK, Merenda, PF, Spielberger, CD (2005). Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-cultural Assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
Harvey, PD, Penn, DL (2010). Social cognition: The key factor predicting social outcome in people with schizophrenia? Psychiatry 7, 4144.Google Scholar
Horan, WP, Kern, RS, Tripp, C, Hellemann, G, Wynn, JK, Bell, M, Marder, SR, Green, MF (2011). Efficacy and specificity of social cognitive skills training for outpatients with psychotic disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research 45, 11131122.Google Scholar
Kern, RS, Nuechterlein, KH, Green, MF, Baade, LE, Fenton, WS, Gold, JM, Keefe, RSE, Mesholam-Gately, R, Mintz, J, Seidman, LJ, Stover, E, Marder, SR (2008). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery. Part 2. Co-norming and standardization. American Journal of Psychiatry 165, 214220.Google Scholar
Marder, SR, Fenton, WS (2004). Measurement and treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia: NIMH MATRICS Initiative to support the development of agents for improving cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 72, 510.Google Scholar
Mayer, JD, Salovey, P, Caruso, DR (2002). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) User's Manual. MHS Publishers: Toronto.Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, KH, Green, MF (2006). MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery. MATRICS Assessment, Inc.: Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, KH, Green, MF, Kern, RS, Baade, LE, Barch, D, Cohen, J, Essock, S, Fenton, WS, Frese, FJ, Gold, JM, Goldberg, T, Heaton, R, Keefe, RSE, Kraemer, H, Mesholam-Gately, R, Seidman, LJ, Stover, E, Weinberger, D, Young, AS, Zalcman, S, Marder, SR (2008). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery. Part 1. Test selection, reliability, and validity. American Journal of Psychiatry 165, 203213.Google Scholar
Pedersen, CA, Gibson, CM, Rau, SW, Salimi, K, Smedley, KL, Casey, RL, Leserman, J, Jarskog, LF, Penn, DL (2011). Intranasal oxytocin reduces psychotic symptoms and improves Theory of Mind and social perception in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 132, 5053.Google Scholar
Pinkham, AE, Penn, DL, Green, MF, Harvey, PD (2016). Social cognition psychometric evaluation: results of the initial psychometric study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 42, 494504.Google Scholar
Roberts, DL, Penn, DL (2009). Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT) for outpatients with schizophrenia: a preliminary study. Psychiatry Research 166, 141147.Google Scholar
Velligan, DI, Rubin, M, Fredrick, MM, Mintz, J, Nuechterlein, KH, Schooler, NR, Jaeger, J, Peters, NM, Buller, R, Marder, SR, Dube, S (2012). The cultural adaptability of intermediate measures of functional outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 38, 630641.Google Scholar
Wolwer, W, Frommann, N, Haufmann, S, Piaszek, A, Streit, M, Gaebel, W (2005). Remediation of impairments in facial affect recognition in schizophrenia: efficacy and specificity of a new training program. Schizophrenia Research 80, 295303.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hellemann supplementary material

Hellemann supplementary material 1

Download Hellemann supplementary material(File)
File 54.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hellemann supplementary material

Hellemann supplementary material 2

Download Hellemann supplementary material(File)
File 16.1 KB