Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:08:00.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The clinical approach to criminology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

D. J. West
D. J. West*
Affiliation:
Professor of Clinical Criminology, Cambridge
*
1Address for correspondence: Professor D. J. West, Institute of Criminology, 7 West Rd, Cambridge CB3 9DT.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The crucial importance of economic, social and political factors in the definition and incidence of crime is undeniable, as is the need for socio-political change, but the part played by individual characteristics in determining who becomes labelled a criminal should not be neglected. Clinical criminology studies offenders as individuals, examines their peculiarities and their social problems and seeks ways to help them to lead less troubled lives. A wide range of treatment interventions is required, the psychiatric approach is not always the most appropriate.

In view of the lack of success in reducing recidivism by means of treatment, penologists see little justification for continuing to try. More successes might be recognized if treatment schemes were applied with greater realism and discrimination, and if proper evaluations were made more often. In any event, some offenders need treatment regardless of the effect upon their offending behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 1980 , pp. 619 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper was presented in April 1980 as the nineteenth Sir Geoffrey Vickers Lecture, under the auspices of the Mental Health Foundation.

References

REFERENCES

Bernsten, K. & Christiansen, K. O. (1965). A resocialisation experiment with short term offenders. In Scandinavian Studies in Criminology Vol. 1 (ed. Christiansen, K. O.), pp. 35–54. Tavistock: London.Google Scholar
Bluglass, R. (1966). A psychiatric study of Scottish prisoners. M.D. thesis, cited in Gunn et al. (1978).Google Scholar
Bluglass, R. (1979). The psychiatric assessment of homicide. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 19, 366–377.Google Scholar
Bowman, P. H. (1959). Effects of a revised school program on potential delinquents. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 322, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. J. (1976). The Effectiveness of Sentencing. Home Office Research Unit Study No. 35. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Delin, B. (1978). The Sex Offender. Beacon Press: Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward Puritans. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1978). The effectiveness of sentences. Justice of the Peace 142, 68–71.Google Scholar
Federal Probation (1979). Editorial: It has come to our attention; 43 (1), 86.Google Scholar
Fowles, A. J. (1978). Prison Welfare: an Account of an Experiment at Liverpool. Home Office Research Unit Study No. 45. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. (1977). Epileptics in Prison. Academic Press:London.Google Scholar
Gunn, J., Robertson, G., Dell, S. & Way, C. (1978). Psychiatric Aspects of Imprisonment. Academic Press:London.Google Scholar
Kassebaum, G., Ward, D. & Wilner, D. (1971). Prison Treatment and Parole Survival. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Lipton, D., Martinson, R. & Wilks, J. (1975). The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment: A Survey of Treatment Evaluation Studies. Praeger: New York.Google Scholar
May, Justice (chairman) (1979). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the United Kingdom Prison Services. Cmnd. 7673. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
McCord, J. (1978). A thirty year follow up of treatment effects. American Psychologist 33, 284–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messinger, E. & Apfelberg, B. (1961). A quarter century of court psychiatry. Crime and Delinquency 7, 343–362.Google Scholar
Osborn, S. G. & West, D. J. (1980). Do delinquents really reform? Journal of Adolescence 3, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, T. (1970). The Frying Pan. Hutchinson: London.Google Scholar
Quay, H. C. (1977). The three faces of evaluation. Criminal Justice and Behavior 4, 341–354.Google Scholar
Robins, L. (1966). Deviant Children Grown Up. Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore.Google Scholar
Romig, D. A. (1978). Justice for our Children. Heath:Lexington, Mass.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1972). Human violence viewed from the psychiatric clinic. American Journal of Psychiatry 128, 1043–1055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salem, S. (1980). Psychiatric Remands Research Project. Cambridge Institute of Criminology (personal communcation).Google Scholar
Sarason, I. G. (1978). A cognitive social learning approach to juvenile delinquency. In Psychopathic Behavior (ed. Hare, R. D. and Schalling, D.), pp. 299–317. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Saylor, M. (1980). A guided self-help approach to the treatment of the habitual sex offender. In Sex Offenders in the Criminal Justice System (ed. West, D. J.), pp. 201–217. Cropwood Conference Series No. 12. Institute of Criminology: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. (1974). Social Work in Prison. Home Office Research Study No. 22. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Topp, D. O. (1979). Suicide in prison. British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, N. D. (1980). Hitting offenders where it really hurts. The Times 12 03.Google Scholar
West, D. J. & Farrington, D. P. (1977). The Delinquent Way of Life. Heinemann Educational Books: London.Google Scholar