Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:43:55.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carotid endarterectomy: does it improve cognitive or motor functioning?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

W. Van Den Burg ,
R. J. Saan ,
A. H. Van Zomeren ,
A. H. Boontje ,
R. Haaxma  and
T. E. Wichmann
W. Van Den Burg*
Affiliation:
Departments of Neuropsychology, Neurology and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
R. J. Saan
Affiliation:
Departments of Neuropsychology, Neurology and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
A. H. Van Zomeren
Affiliation:
Departments of Neuropsychology, Neurology and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
A. H. Boontje
Affiliation:
Departments of Neuropsychology, Neurology and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
R. Haaxma
Affiliation:
Departments of Neuropsychology, Neurology and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
T. E. Wichmann
Affiliation:
Departments of Neuropsychology, Neurology and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr W. van den Burg, Department of Neuropsychology, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital, Oostersingel 59, 9713 EZ Groningen. The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

In a group of 20 patients who were to undergo endarterectomy for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the internal carotid artery, the stenosis did not appear to have resulted in cognitive or motor deficits. Consistent with this finding, surgery could not be shown to have a beneficial effect on cognitive or motor functioning. Control data were supplied by 20 patients who underwent peripheral vascular surgery and 20 healthy subjects. The test-retest interval was 10 weeks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , May 1985 , pp. 341 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asken, M. & Hobson, W. (1977). Intellectual change and carotid endarterectomy, subjective speculation or objective reality: a review. Journal of Surgical Research 23, 367–375.Google Scholar
Binder, L. M., Tanabe, C. T., Waller, F. T. & Wooster, N. E. (1982). Behavioral effects of superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass surgery: preliminary report. Neurology 32, 422–424.Google Scholar
Boeke, S. (1981). The effect of carotid endarterectomy on mental functioning. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 83, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, R. A., Benoit, B. G. & Trites, R. L. (1981). Neuropsycho-logical changes following endarterectomy. Le Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 8 127–132.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
De Jong, C. A., Luteijn, F. & Van Zomeren, A. H. (1976). De evaluatie van Raven's standard progressive matrices in een neurologische proefgroep en de constructie van een verkorte vorm Thesis: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Eastcott, H. H. G., Pickering, G. W. J. & Rob, G. C. (1954). Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia. Lancet ii, 994–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M. P., Garron, D. C. & Javid, H. (1980). Carotid artery disease, carotid endarterectomy, and behavior. Archives of Neurology 37, 743–748.Google Scholar
Luteijn, F. (1966). Een nieuwe verkorte GIT. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie 21, 675–682.Google Scholar
Matarazzo, R. G., Matarazzo, J. D., Gallo, A. E. & Wiens, A. N. (1979). IQ and neuropsychological changes following carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Tests. (1969). American Guidance Service: Circle Pines, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Parker, J. C., Granberg, B. W., Nichols, W. K., Jones, J. G. & Hewett, J. E. (1983). Mental status outcomes following carotid endarterectomy. A six-month analysis. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 5, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Zomeren, A. H. (1981). Reaction Time and Attention after Closed Head Injury. Swets and Zeitlinger: Lisse.Google Scholar
Van Zomeren, A. H. & Deelman, B. G. (1978). Long-term recovery of visual reaction time after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 41, 452–457.Google Scholar
Verhage, F. (1964). Intelligentie en leeftijd. Van Gorcum: Assen.Google Scholar