Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:37:55.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brief report on the clinical reappraisal of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule carried out at the Johns Hopkins site of the Epidemiological Catchment Area Program of the NIMH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Marshal F. Folstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Alan J. Romanoski
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Gerald Nestadt
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Raman Chahal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Altaf Merchant
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Sam Shapiro
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Morton Kramer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
James Anthony
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Ernest M. Gruenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Paul R. McHugh
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Marshal Folstein,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Room 320 Osler, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Synopsis

A psychiatric examination was conducted on 810 community dwelling subjects previously given a diagnosis derived from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS). The agreement in allocating subjects to a particular disorder was never high enough to encourage the confident replacement of a psychiatric diagnosis with a DIS diagnosis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, J. C., Folstein, M. F., Romanoski, A. J., Von Korff, M. R., Nestadt, G. R., Chahal, R., Merchant, A., Brown, H., Shapiro, S., Kramer, M. & Gruenberg, E. M. (1985). Comparison of the lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule and a standardized psychiatric diagnosis. Archives of General Psychiatry 42, 667675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, W. W. & Kessler, L. G. (eds.) (1985). Epidemiohgic Field Methods in Psychiatry. Academic Press: San Francisco (in the press).Google Scholar
Hesselbrock, V., Stabenau, J., Hesselbrock, M., Mirkin, P. & Meyer, R. (1982). A comparison of two interview schedules. Archives of General Psychiatry 39, 674677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luria, R. E. & Berry, R. (1979). Reliability and descriptive validity of PSE syndromes. Archives of General Psychiatry 36, 11871195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luria, R. E. & McHugh, P. R. (1974). Reliability and clinical utility of the ‘Wing’ Present State Examination. Archives of General Psychiatry 30, 866871.Google Scholar
Regier, D. A., Myers, J. K. & Kramer, M. (1985). The NIMH Epidemiological Catchment Area Program: historical context, major objectives, and study population characteristics. Archives of General Psychiatry (in the press).Google Scholar
Richardson, S. A., Dohrenwend, B. S. & Klein, D. (1965). Interviewing: Its Form and Function. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J. & Ratcliff, K. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Archives of General Psychiatry 38, 381389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Ratcliff, K. S. & Seyfried, W. (1982). Validity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version II: DSM-III diagnoses. Psychological Medicine 12, 855870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. K. (1983). Use and abuse of the PSE. British Journal of Psychiatry 143, 111117.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974). The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar