Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Green, Gill
2001.
Vulnerability of witnesses with learning disabilities: preparing to give evidence against a perpetrator of sexual abuse.
British Journal of Learning Disabilities,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
103.
Milne, Rebecca
Clare, Isabel C. H.
and
Bull, Ray
2002.
Interrogative Suggestibility among Witnesses with Mild Intellectual Disabilities: the Use of an Adaptation of the GSS.
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
8.
Milne, Rebecca
Clare, Isabel C. H.
and
Bull, Ray
2002.
Interrogative Suggestibility among Witnesses with Mild Intellectual Disabilities: the Use of an Adaptation of the GSS.
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
8.
2002.
The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions.
p.
631.
Stobbs, Georgina
and
Kebbell, Mark Rhys
2003.
Jurors' Perception of Witnesses with Intellectual Disabilities and the Influence of Expert Evidence.
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
107.
Parton, Felicity
Day, Andrew
and
White, Jack
2004.
An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Intellectual Ability and an Understanding of the Legal Process in Male Remand Prisoners.
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
p.
96.
Cederborg, Ann-Christin
and
Lamb, Michael E.
2006.
How does the legal system respond when children with learning difficulties are victimized?.
Child Abuse & Neglect,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 5,
p.
537.
O’Callaghan, A. C.
and
Murphy, G. H.
2007.
Sexual relationships in adults with intellectual disabilities: understanding the law.
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 3,
p.
197.
2008.
Tell Me What Happened.
p.
317.
Ternes, Marguerite
and
Yuille, John C.
2008.
Eyewitness Memory and Eyewitness Identification Performance in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 6,
p.
519.
Willner, P.
2008.
Clarification of the memory artefact in the assessment of suggestibility.
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 4,
p.
318.
Cederborg, Ann-Christin
and
Gumpert, Clara H.
2010.
The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse.
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
125.
Gudjonsson, Gisli H.
2010.
Psychological vulnerabilities during police interviews. Why are they important?.
Legal and Criminological Psychology,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 2,
p.
161.
Faccini, Lino
and
Saide, Marie Alezey
2011.
Psychologists’ Experience with Interviewing and Analyzing Abuse Allegations of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.
Sexuality and Disability,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
291.
Gudjonsson, Gisli
and
Joyce, Theresa
2011.
Interviewing adults with intellectual disabilities.
Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 2,
p.
16.
Milne, Becky
O'Mahony, Brendan M.
Smith, Kevin
and
Milne, Becky
2011.
The early identification of vulnerable witnesses prior to an investigative interview.
The British Journal of Forensic Practice,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
114.
Brown, Natalie Novick
Gudjonsson, Gisli
and
Connor, Paul
2011.
Suggestibility and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: I'll Tell You Anything You Want to Hear.
The Journal of Psychiatry & Law,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Henry, Lucy A.
Bettenay, Caroline
and
Carney, Daniel P. J.
2011.
Children's Testimony.
p.
251.
Pillay, Anthony L.
2012.
The Rape Survivor with an Intellectual Disabilityvs.the Court.
South African Journal of Psychology,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 3,
p.
312.
Pillay, Anthony L
2012.
Intellectually disabled child and adolescent sexual violence survivors face greater challenges in the legal system.
Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
iii.