Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:43:19.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of the Feighner criteria for schizophrenia and affective disorders using long-term outcome data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Ming T. Tsuang ,
Robert F. Woolson  and
John C. Simpson
Ming T. Tsuang*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and the Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
Robert F. Woolson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and the Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
John C. Simpson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and the Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
*
1Professor M. T. Tsuang, University of Iowa Psychiatric Hospital, 500 Newton Road, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Schizophrenia and affective disorders selected according to the Feighner criteria can be differentiated on the basis of 40-year outcome. Within schizophrenia the presence of disorganized thoughts at the index admission was associated with poor outcome, whereas better outcome was associated with the presence of delusions or hallucinations. Within the affective disorders, bipolar patients with grandiose delusions or ideas showed a poor outcome; a better outcome was found in unipolar patients with complaints of fatiguability or tiredness at the time of the index admission.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , May 1981 , pp. 281 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, Y. M., Feinberg, S. E. & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Feighner, J. P., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., Woodruff, R. A., Winokur, G. & Munoz, R. (1972). Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry 26, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grizzle, J. E.Starmer, F. C. & Koch, G. G. (1969). Analysis of categorical data by linear models. Biometrics 25, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraepelin, E. (1899). Zur Diagnose und Prognose der Dementia Praecox. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie und psychisch-gerichtliche Medizin 56, 254.Google Scholar
Tsuang, M. T. & Winokur, G. (1974). Criteria for subtyping schizophrenia: clinical differentiation of hebephrenic and paranoid schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 31, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuang, M. T., Winokur, G. & Crowe, R. R. (1980 b). Morbidity risks of schizophrenia and affective disorders among first degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia, mania, depression and surgical conditions. British Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuang, M. T., Woolson, R. F. & Fleming, J. A. (1979). Long-term outcome of major psychoses. I. Schizophrenia and affective disorders compared with psychiatrically symptom-free surgical conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry 36, 1295–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuang, M. T., Woolson, R. F. & Simpson, J. C. (1980 a). The Iowa Structured Psychiatric Interview: rationale, reliability, and validity. Acta psychiatrica scandinavica 62 (Suppl. 283).Google Scholar