Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:07:38.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validity of the Japanese version of the GHQ among antenatal clinic attendants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

T. Kitamura ,
M. Sugawara ,
M. Aoki  and
S. Shima
T. Kitamura*
Affiliation:
Section of Mental Health for the Elderly, National Institute of Mental Health; Department of Psychology, Tokyo Metropolitan University; and Department of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Japan
M. Sugawara
Affiliation:
Section of Mental Health for the Elderly, National Institute of Mental Health; Department of Psychology, Tokyo Metropolitan University; and Department of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Japan
M. Aoki
Affiliation:
Section of Mental Health for the Elderly, National Institute of Mental Health; Department of Psychology, Tokyo Metropolitan University; and Department of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Japan
S. Shima
Affiliation:
Section of Mental Health for the Elderly, National Institute of Mental Health; Department of Psychology, Tokyo Metropolitan University; and Department of Psychiatry, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Japan
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr T. Kitamura, NIMH, 1–7–3 Konodai, Ichikawa, Chiba 272, Japan.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The validity of the Japanese version of the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was examined against the semi-structured interview-based Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) as external criteria. The GHQ total score discriminated ‘cases’ and ‘non-cases’ satisfactorily but its recommended cut-off point was higher (7/8) than that of the original English version (4/5). Discriminant function analysis revealed that only 13 items contributed to the discriminatory power and that their discriminant function score was better than a simple summation of the 30 GHQ item scores in terms of validity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , May 1989 , pp. 507 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheng, T. A. (1985). A pilot study of mental disorders in Taiwan. Psychological Medicine 15, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleary, P. D., Goldberg, I. D., Kessler, L. G. & Nycz, G. R. (1982). Screening for mental disorder among primary care patients. Usefulness of the General Health Questionnaire. Archives of General Psychiatry 39, 837–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corney, R. H. (1984). The mental and physical health of clients referred to social workers in a local authority department and a general practice attachment scheme. Psychological Medicine 14, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontanesi, F., Govetti, C., Zimmermann-Tansella, C. H. & Tansella, M. (1985). Validation of the Italian version of the GHQ in a general practice setting. Psychological Medicine 15, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, M., McDonald-Scott, P. & Endicott, J. (1981). Mastering the art of research interviewing. A model training procedure for diagnostic evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry 38, 1259–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilleard, C. J., Belford, H., Gilleard, E., Whittick, J. E. & Gledhill, K. (1984). Emotional distress amongst the supporters of the elderly mentally infirm. British Journal of Psychiatry 145, 172–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire: A Technique for the Identification and Assessment of Non-psychotic Psychiatric Illness (Maudsley monographs, No. 21). Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (1985). Identifying psychiatric illness among general medical patients. British Medical Journal 291, 161–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P., Cooper, B., Eastwood, M. R., Kedward, H. B. & Shepherd, M. (1970). A standardized psychiatric interview for use in community surveys. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine 24, 18–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoeper, E. W., Nycz, G. R., Cleary, P. D., Regier, D. A. & Goldberg, I. D. (1979). Estimated prevalence of RDC mental disorder in primary medical care. International Journal of Mental Health 10, 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitamura, T. & Shima, S. (1986). Interrater reliability of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS) and Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC). Seishin Igaku 28, 41–45. (In Japanese.)Google Scholar
Kitamura, T., Shima, S., Sakio, E. & Kato, M. (1986). Application of Research Diagnostic Criteria and International Classification of Diseases to case vignettes. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 47, 78–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Kitamura, T., Shima, S., Sakio, E. & Kato, M. (1988) Psychiatric diagnosis in Japan. I. A study on diagnostic labels used by practitioners. Psychopathology (submitted).Google Scholar
Medina-Mora, M. E., Padilla, G. P., Campillo-Serrano, C., Mas, C. C., Ezb´n, M., Caraveo, J. & Corona, J. (1983). The factor structure of the GHQ: A scaled version for a hospital's general practice service in Mexico. Psychological Medicine 13, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakagawa, Y. & Daibo, I. (1981). Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the General Health Questionnaire and its Clinical Application. National Institute of Mental Health Japan: Ichikawa. (In Japanese.)Google Scholar
Norušis, M. J. (1985). SPSS-X Advanced Statistics Guide. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Nott, P. N. & Cutts, S. (1982). Validation of the 30-item General Health Questionnaire in postpartum women. Psychological Medicine 12, 409–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L. & Endicott, J (1978). Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (3rd ed.). Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L, Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1978). Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for a Selected Group of Functional Disorders (3rd ed.) Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York.Google Scholar
Tarnopolsky, A., Hand, D. J., McLean, E. K., Roberts, H. & Wiggins, R. D. (1979). Validity and uses of a screening questionnaire (GHQ) in the community. British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 508–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974). Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms: An Instruction Manual for the PSE and Catego Program. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar