Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:36:04.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the psychological stress evaluator in conditions of extreme stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

John Gunn  and
Gisli Gudjonsson
John Gunn*
Affiliation:
Section of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
Gisli Gudjonsson
Affiliation:
Section of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
*Address for correspondence Professor J. Gunn, Section of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry. De Crespigny Park. Camberwell, London SE5 8AF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The Psychological Stress Evaluator (PSEV) is a machine for detecting signs of stress in the voice. It was tested using tape recordings of negotiators during a prolonged terrorist siege in which a number of death threats were issued. The study aimed to test whether the PSEV could distinguish between the traces of terrorist voices before the death threats from voice traces at other points. A scoring system using the proportion of voice oscillations falling above defined amplitude levels was used. PSEV scores did rise significantly more just before the actual shooting of a hostage. Unfortunately, the apparatus proved to be slow and cumbersome in practice and of limited, or no, use during the course of incidents similar to the one analysed.

Type
Brief Communication
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 235 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barland, G. H. (1974). Use of voice changes in the detection of deception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 55, 423 (abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barland, G. H. (1975). Detection of deception in criminal subjects: a field study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.Google Scholar
Brenner, M. (1974). Stage fright and Steven's law.Paper presented at Easter Psychological Association Convention,New York,April, (available from Dektor).Google Scholar
Brenner, M & Branscomb, H. H. (1979). The psychological stress evaluator. Technical limitations affecting lie detection. Polygraph 8, 127–132.Google Scholar
Dektor, , (1976). The psychological stress evaluator.Dektor CIS Inc.5508 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Va.22151, USA.Google Scholar
Fuller, B. F. (1984). Reliability and validity of an interval measure of vocal stress. Psychological Medicine 14 159–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gudjonsson, G. H. & Howard, L. R. C. (1982). Case Reporthysterical amnesia as an alternative to suicide. Medicine, Science and the Law 22, 68–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubis, J. F. (1974). Comparison of voice analysis and polygraph as lie detection procedures. Polygraph 3, 1–48.Google Scholar
Lippold, A. C. J. (1971). Physiological tremor. Scientific American 224 65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, B E & Henry, D. R. (1979). A validity study of the psychological stress evaluator. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 11, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. A. (1977). Voice analysis for the measurement of anxiety. British Journal of Medical Psychology 50, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggins, S. L., McCranie, M. L. & Bailey, P. (1975). Assessment of voice stress in children. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 160, 402–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worth, J. W. & Lewis, B. (1975). Presence of the dentist: a stress provoking cue? Virginia Dental Journal 04, 22.Google Scholar