Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:34:05.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The undue influence of shape and weight on self-evaluation in anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and restrained eaters: a combined ERP and behavioral study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

J. Blechert*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany
U. Ansorge
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria Institute of Cognitive Science; Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrueck, Germany
S. Beckmann
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany
B. Tuschen-Caffier
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr J. Blechert, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Background

Current theories and nosology assume that the self-evaluation (SE) of individuals with eating disorders (EDs) is unduly influenced by body shape and weight. However, experimental data supporting this link are scarce, and it is not specified which subdomains of SE might be affected.

Method

We studied patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN) and healthy controls (HC) with an affective priming (AP) procedure (Study 1) to unveil explicit and implicit associations between shape/weight and SE. We used weight/shape-related prime sentences, complemented by affectively congruent and incongruent target words from two SE domains. AP effects were assessed by event-related potentials (ERPs), reaction times (RTs) and subjective ratings. The ratings were also assessed (Study 2) in undergraduate restrained (RES) and unrestrained eaters (UNRES).

Results

Study 1 demonstrated stronger AP effects in both ED groups compared to HC on RTs and subjective ratings. ERPs showed AP effects only in the BN group. Restrained eaters showed similar, albeit less pronounced, priming effects on subjective ratings.

Conclusions

ED patients associate shape/weight concerns with the non-appearance-related SE domains of interpersonal relationships and achievement/performance. These associations seem to be encoded deeper in BN patients relative to the other groups. Links between shape/weight and SE explain how body dissatisfaction impacts on self-esteem and mood in ED. The existence of similar associations in restrained eaters supports a continuum model according to which increasing associations between shape/weight and SE go along with increasing levels of ED symptoms.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APA (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Beck, AT, Beamesderfer, A (1974). Assessment of depression: the depression inventory. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry 7, 151169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaskovich, J, Tomaka, J (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (ed. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R. and Wrightsman, L. S.), vol. 1, pp. 115160. Academic Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostanov, V, Kotchoubey, B (2004). Recognition of affective prosody: continuous wavelet measures of event-related brain potentials to emotional exclamations. Psychophysiology 41, 259268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruch, H (1962). Perceptual and conceptual disturbances in anorexia nervosa. Psychosomatic Medicine 24, 187194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockerham, E, Stopa, L, Bell, L, Gregg, A (2009). Implicit self-esteem in bulimia nervosa. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 40, 265273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, MJ, Clark, DM, Fairburn, CG (1993). An experimental study of the relationship between thoughts and eating behaviour in bulimia nervosa. Behaviour Research and Therapy 31, 749757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, Z, Fairburn, CG (1987). The eating disorder examination: a semi-structured interview for the assessment of the specific psychopathology of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders 6, 18.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deveney, CM, Pizzagalli, DA (2008). The cognitive consequences of emotion regulation: an ERP investigation. Psychophysiology 45, 435444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinkel, A, Berth, H, Exner, C, Rief, W, Balck, F (2005). German version of the Restraint Scale for the assessment of restrained eating [in German]. Diagnostica 51, 6774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairburn, CG, Beglin, SJ (1994). Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? International Journal of Eating Disorders 16, 363370.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairburn, CG, Cooper, Z, Shafran, R (2003). Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: a ‘transdiagnostic’ theory and treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy 41, 509528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feige, B (1999). Oscillatory Brain Activity and its Analysis on the Basis of EEG and MEG. Waxmann: Münster/New York/München/Berlin.Google Scholar
Ferring, D, Filipp, S-H (1996). Measurement of self-esteem: findings on reliability, validity, and stability of the Rosenberg Scale [in German]. Diagnostica 42, 284292.Google Scholar
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW (1995). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Biometrics Research Department: New York.Google Scholar
Fleming, JS, Courtney, BE (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem: II. Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 404421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, PE, Goldbloom, D, Davis, R, Olmsted, MP, Garner, DM, Halmi, KA (1992). Body dissatisfaction in bulimia nervosa: relationship to weight and shape concerns and psychological functioning. International Journal of Eating Disorders 11, 151161.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, J, Johnston, C, Madson, K, Goldner, EM, Remick, RA, Birmingham, CL (1998). Shape- and weight-based self-esteem and the eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders 24, 285298.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfein, JA, Walsh, BT, Midlarsky, E (2000). Influence of shape and weight on self-evaluation in bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders 27, 435445.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hautzinger, M, Bailer, M, Worall, H, Keller, F (1994). Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [in German]. Huber: Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Heatherton, TF, Polivy, J (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60, 895910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, CP, Polivy, J (1980). Retrained eating. In Obesity (ed. Stunkard, A. J.), pp. 208225. Saunders: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Hilbert, A, Tuschen-Caffier, B, Karwautz, A, Niederhofer, H, Munsch, S (2007). Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the German version [in German]. Diagnostica 53, 144154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, A, Tuschen-Caffier, B, Ohms, M (2004). Eating Disorders Examination: a German version of the Structured Eating Disorder Interviews [in German]. Diagnostica 50, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeister, K, Teige-Mocigemba, S, Blechert, J, Klauer, KC, Tuschen-Caffier, B (2010). Is implicit self-esteem linked to body shape and weight in restrained and unrestrained eaters? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 41, 3138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, C (2000). Self-concept disturbances in patients with eating disorders [in German]. Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie 29, 7596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, C, Hayward, C, de Zwaan, M, Kraemer, HC, Agras, WS (2004). Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin 130, 1965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Junghofer, M, Peyk, P (2004). Analysis and visualization of electrical potentials and magnetic fields of the brain [in German]. MatLab Select 2, 2428.Google Scholar
Kernis, MH, Abend, TA, Goldman, BM, Shrira, I, Paradise, AN, Hampton, C (2005). Self-serving responses arising from discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-esteem. Self and Identity 4, 311333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, HW, O'Mara, A (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34, 542552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarlane, T, McCabe, RE, Jarry, J, Olmsted, MP, Polivy, J (2001). Weight-related and shape-related self-evaluation in eating-disordered and non-eating-disordered women. International Journal of Eating Disorders 29, 328335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijboom, A, Jansen, A, Kampman, M, Schouten, E (1999). An experimental test of the relationship between self-esteem and concern about body shape and weight in restrained eaters. International Journal of Eating Disorders 25, 327334.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R, Wilson, T (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84, 231259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulhus, DL (1984). Two component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 598609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, KM, Loeb, K, Vitousek, KM (1996). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In Body Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity (ed. Thompson, J. K.), pp. 253302. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rhodes, SM, Donaldson, DI (2008). Association and not semantic relationships elicit the N400 effect: electrophysiological evidence from an explicit language comprehension task. Psychophysiology 45, 5059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M (1979). Conceiving the Self. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
Schirmer, A, Kotz, SA, Friederici, AD (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 14, 228233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schütz, A, Sellin, I (2006). The Multidimensional Self-Esteem Scale (MSES) [in German]. Hogrefe: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Shavelson, RJ, Hubner, JJ, Stanton, GC (1976). Self-concept: validation of construct interpretation. Review of Educational Research 46, 407441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F, Deutsch, R (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8, 220247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, KM, Hollon, SD (1990). The investigation of schematic content and processing in eating disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research 14, 191214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilksch, S, Wade, TD (2004). Differences between women with anorexia nervosa and restrained eaters on shape and weight concerns, self-esteem, and depression. International Journal of Eating Disorders 35, 571578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittchen, HU, Zaudig, M, Fydrich, T (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II [in German]. Hogrefe: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q, Lawson, A, Guo, C, Jiang, Y (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of visual affective priming. Brain Research Bulletin 71, 316323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed