Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:32:29.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two plus two equals three? Do we need to rethink lifetime prevalence?

A commentary on ‘How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospective versus retrospective ascertainment’ by Moffitt et al. (2009)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2009

E. Susser  and
P. E. Shrout
E. Susser*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, USA
P. E. Shrout
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: E. Susser, M.D., Dr.P.H., Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Office 1030, 722 W. 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Lifetime prevalencemental disordersmental healthpsychiatric epidemiology
Type
Commentary
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 40 , Issue 6 , June 2010 , pp. 895 - 897
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cumming, G, Finch, S (2005). Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist 60, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruenberg, EM (1963). A review of mental health in the metropolis. The midtown Manhattan study. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 41, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horwitz, AV, Wakefield, JC (2007). The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder. Oxford University Press: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, RC, Merikangas, KR, Berglund, P, Eaton, WW, Koretz, DS, Walters, EE (2003). Mild disorders should not be eliminated from the DSM-V. Archives of General Psychiatry 60, 1117–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, O (1976). Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 103, 226–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, TE, Caspi, A, Taylor, A, Kokaua, J, Milne, BJ, Polanczyk, G, Poulton, R (2009). How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospective versus retrospective ascertainment. Psychological Medicine. Published online: 1 September 2009. doi:10.1017/S0033291709991036.Google ScholarPubMed
Narrow, WE, Rae, DS, Robins, LN, Regier, DA (2002). Revised prevalence estimates of mental disorders in the United States: using a clinical significance criterion to reconcile 2 surveys' estimates. Archives of General Psychiatry 59, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, G (2007). Is depression overdiagnosed? Yes. British Medical Journal 335, 328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regier, DA, Kaelber, CT, Rae, DS, Farmer, ME, Knauper, B, Kessler, RC, Norquist, GS (1998). Limitations of diagnostic criteria and assessment instruments for mental disorders. Implications for research and policy. Archives of General Psychiatry 55, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothman, KJ, Greenland, S, Lash, TL (2008). Modern Epidemiology. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Susser, E, Schwartz, S, Morabia, A, Bromet, E (2006). Psychiatric Epidemiology: Searching for the Causes of Mental Disorders. Oxford University Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (2001). The World Health Report 2001. Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar