Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T20:56:59.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scoring nonresponse on the Mini-Mental State Examination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

G. G. Fillenbaum ,
L. K. George  and
D. G. Blazer
G. G. Fillenbaum*
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development and Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
L. K. George
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development and Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
D. G. Blazer
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development and Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
*
1 Address for correspondence: Dr Gerda G. Fillenbaum, Box 3003, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Alternative procedures for coding nonresponse on the Mini-Mental State Examination (as error or as correct) results in different classification of 13% of a random sample of 1931 subjects aged 60 and over. Comparison of responders' and nonresponders' ability to perform activities of daily living, and examination of the relative difficulty level of omitted items indicates that, in epidemiological surveys, scoring nonresponse as error is more likely to be correct.

Type
Brief Communication
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , November 1988 , pp. 1021 - 1025
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blazer, D., George, L. K., Landerman, R., Pennybacker, M., Melville, M. L., Woodbury, M., Manlon, K. G., Jordan, K. & Locke, B. (1985). Psychiatric disorders: a rural/urban comparison. Archives of General Psychiatry 42, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fillenbaum, G. G. (1980). A comparison of two brief tests of organicity: the Mental Status Questionnaire and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 28, 381–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillenbaum, G. G. (1985). Screening the elderly: a brief instrumental ADL measure. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 32, 698–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. (1975). ‘Minimental state.’ A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, E. (1975). A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 23, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regier, D. A., Myers, J. K., Kramer, M., Robins, L. N., Blazer, D. G., Hough, R. L., Eaton, W. W. & Locke, B. Z. (1984). The NIMH Epidemiology Catchment Area Program. Archives of General Psychiatry 41, 934–941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J. & Ratcliff, K. S. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health diagnostic interview schedule: its history, characteristics and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry 38, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed