Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:47:22.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reporting of mental disorders research in British media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2011

G. Lewison ,
P. Roe ,
A. Wentworth  and
G. Szmukler
G. Lewison
Affiliation:
University College London, London, UK
P. Roe
Affiliation:
Evaluametrics Ltd, St Albans, UK
A. Wentworth
Affiliation:
Evaluametrics Ltd, St Albans, UK
G. Szmukler*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor G. Szmukler, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, de Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

While the media may significantly influence public attitudes and government policies affecting the research agenda, how mental health research is reported in the media has been virtually unstudied. The aim of this study was to examine stories concerning mental health research published on the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) website between 1999 and 2008 and in New Scientist between 2008 and 2010.

Method

Stories were retrieved from on-line archives. Story content was coded and assessed against: ‘disease burden’ of mental disorders; the general corpus of research papers in mental health and the countries from which they originated; the journals in which cited papers were published; and funding sources.

Results

A total of 1015 BBC stories reporting mental health research and 133 New Scientist stories were found. The distribution of stories did not reflect ‘disease burden’; research on dementia was over-represented, while depression and alcohol were under-represented. There was an emphasis on biological research while stories on psychological interventions were rare. UK research was over-represented. Research funded by government and private non-profit sources was over-represented. Commentators from Alzheimer's Disease charities were prominent.

Conclusions

Consideration of reported stories may suggest approaches to working with the media to improve the public understanding of, and support for, mental health research. The role of commentators may be especially important.

Keywords

BBCbibliometricsmediamental disordersresearch
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , February 2012 , pp. 435 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dawson, G, Lucocq, B, Cottrell, R, Lewison, G (1998). Mapping the Landscape: National Biomedical Research Outputs, 1988–95. Policy Report no. 9. The Wellcome Trust: London.Google Scholar
Francis, C, Pirkis, J, Blood, RW, Dunt, D, Burgess, P, Morely, B (2005). Portrayal of depression and other mental illnesses in Australian nonfiction media. Journal of Community Psychology 33, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, SS, Seery, BL (2006). Behind the facts: helping students evaluate media reports of psychological research. Teaching of Psychology 33, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S (1997). Overview. In Do the Media Govern? Politicians, Voters and Reporters in America (ed. Iyengar, S. and Reeves, R.), chapter 26, pp. 211–216. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Lewison, G, Tootell, S, Roe, P, Sullivan, R (2008). How do the media report cancer research? A study of the UK's BBC website. British Journal of Cancer 99, 569–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewison, G, Turnbull, T (2010). News in brief and features in New Scientist magazine and the biomedical research papers that they cite, August 2008 to July 2009. Scientometrics 85, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, D, Huntington, P, Jamali, H, Williams, P (2007). Digital Health Information for the Consumer: Evidence and Policy Implications. Ashgate Publishing Ltd: Aldershot, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Passalacqua, R, Caminiti, C, Salvagni, S, Barni, S, Beretta, GD, Carlini, P (2004). Effects of media information on cancer patients' opinions, feelings, decision-making process and physician–patient communication. Cancer 100, 1077–1084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, DP, Kanter, EJ, Bednarczyk, B, Tastad, PL (1991). Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. New England Journal of Medicine 325, 1180–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stip, E, Caron, J, Mancini-Marie, A (2006). General population perceptions and attitudes towards schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Primary Care and Community Psychiatry 11, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, PA, Villegas, J, Jennings, NA (2004). Images of mental illness in the media: identifying gaps in the research. Schizophrenia Bulletin 30, 543–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart, H (2006). Media portrayal of mental illness and its treatments – what effect does it have on people with mental illness? CNS Drugs 20, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2010). Global Burden of Disease by Country: Death and DALY Estimates for 2004 (http://hqsulin02.who.int:8086/ghodata/resources/gbddeathdalycountryestimates2004.xls). Accessed 28 December 2010.Google Scholar
Webster, BM (2005). International presence and impact of the UK biomedical research, 1989–2000. Aslib Proceedings 57, 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A, Bonevski, B, Jones, A, Henry, D (2009). Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist. PLOS One 4, e4831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed