Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:21:20.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-natal depression in an urban area of Portugal: comparison of childbearing women and matched controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

A. Augusto ,
R. Kumar ,
J. M. Calheiros ,
E. Matos  and
E. Figueiredo
A. Augusto
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Psychiatry, London
R. Kumar*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Psychiatry, London
J. M. Calheiros
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Psychiatry, London
E. Matos
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Psychiatry, London
E. Figueiredo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal; Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Professor R. Kumar, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The point prevalence of depression measured on one occasion between 2 and 5 months after childbirth was estimated to be 13·1% in 352 mothers living in urban Portugal; the criterion was a score of 13 or more on a translated version of the Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (EPDS). More detailed comparisons were made between a subgroup of 118 mothers and 118 matched controls who had not borne a child in the previous 2 years. Post-natal women were twice as likely as non-childbearing controls to meet the EPDS criterion for depression. In comparison with controls, they were also more severely depressed as judged by their total scores on another questionnaire, the Zung Scale. Comparisons of individual symptom scores (Zung Scale) showed that childbearing women, as a whole, reported more somatic symptoms than controls, but when only those women judged to be depressed or dysphoric by the EPDS were compared, this difference disappeared. Stepwise logistic analyses of symptoms contributing to the categorization of a ‘case’ of post-natal versus non-post-natal depression did not reveal any very clear divergences in selfreported psychopathology. In childbearing women, two factors were found significantly to contribute to higher depression scores; women with more children and those from lower socioeconomic groups were most at risk.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 135 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall: London.Google Scholar
Aoki, M., Kitamura, T., Sinia, S. & Sugawara, M. (1989). Baby blues project. In Hattatsu 9 (ed. Okonogi, K. and Watanabe, H.), pp. 74–79. Minerva Shobou: Tokyo.Google Scholar
Brown, G. W. & Harris, T. (1978). Social Origins of Depression. Tavistock: London.Google ScholarPubMed
Carrothers, A. D. & Murray, L. (1990). Estimating psychiatric morbidity by logistic regression: application to post-natal de-pression in a community sample. Psychological Medicine 20, 695–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, P. J. & Murray, L. (1995). Course and recurrence of postnatal depression. Evidence for the specificity of the diagnostic concept. British Journal of Psychiatry 166, 191–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, J. L. (1983). Postnatal depression: a comparison of Scottish and African women. Social Psychiatry 18, 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. L. (1988). The life event of childbirth: sociocultural aspects of postnatal depression. In Motherhood and Mental Illness 2 (ed. Kumar, R. and Brockington, I. F.), pp. 64–77. Wright: London.Google Scholar
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M. & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression – development of the 10-Item Edinburgh Postnatal Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry 150, 782–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, J. L., Murray, D. & Chapman, G. (1993). A controlled study of the onset, duration and prevalence of postnatal depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 163, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennerstein, L., Leherr, P. & Riphagen, F. (1989). Postpartum depression – risk factors. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology 10, 53–67.Google Scholar
Graffar, M. (1956). Une méthode de classification social d'échantillons de la population. Courrier 6, 455–459.Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W. & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons: New York.Google Scholar
Jadresic, E., Jara, C., Miranda, M., Arrau, B. & Araya, R. (1992). Emotional disorders in pregnancy and the puerperium: a prospective study of 108 women. Revista Medica de Chile Neuropsiquiátrica 30, 99–106.Google Scholar
Jermain, D. M. (1992). Psychopharmacologic approach to postpartum depression. Journal of Women's Health 1, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R. (1994). Postnatal mental illness: a transcultural perspective. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 29, 250–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Hara, M. W. & Zekoski, E. M. (1988). Postpartum depression: a comprehensive review. In Motherhood and Mental Illness, vol. 2 (ed. Kumar, R. and Brockington, I. F.), pp. 17–63. Wright: London.Google Scholar
O'Hara, M. W., Zekoski, E. M., Phillips, L. H. & Wright, E. J. (1990). Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood disorders: comparison of childbearing and non-childbearing women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 99, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okano, T. & Nomura, J. (1995). Puerperal depression. Current Therapy 13, 52–55. (In Japanese.)Google Scholar
Registrar General (1971). Classification of Occupations. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Romito, P. (1990). Postpartum depression and the expression of motherhood. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 69, Suppl. 154, 1–37.Google Scholar
Stern, G. & Kruckman, L. (1983). Multidisciplinary perspectives on postpartum depression: an anthropological critique. Social Science and Medicine 17, 1027–1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorpe, K. J., Dragonas, T. & Golding, J. (1992). The effects of psychosocial factors on the mother's emotional well-being during early parenthood: a cross-cultural study of Britain and Greece. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 10, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiffen, V. E. & Gotlib, I. H. (1993). Comparison of postpartum and non-postpartum depression: clinical presentation, psychiatric history and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Counselling and Clinical Psychology 61, 485–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zung, W. W. K. (1965). A self rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry 12, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed