Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:36:23.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Are we making mountains out of molehills?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2017

S. Moritz ,
J. P. Klein ,
T. Desler ,
H. Lill ,
J. Gallinat  and
B. C. Schneider
S. Moritz*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
J. P. Klein
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Lübeck University, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
T. Desler
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
H. Lill
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
J. Gallinat
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
B. C. Schneider
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
*
*Address for correspondence: S. Moritz, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Most original studies and all meta-analyses conducted to date converge on the conclusion that patients with schizophrenia display rather generalized neurocognitive deficits. For the present study, we reopen this seemingly closed chapter and examine whether important influences, such as lack of motivation and negative attitudes towards cognitive assessment, result in poorer secondary neuropsychological performance.

Method

A sample of 50 patients with an established diagnosis of schizophrenia were tested for routine neurocognitive assessment and compared to 60 nonclinical volunteers. Before and after the assessment, subjective momentary influences were examined (e.g. motivation, concerns about assessment, fear about poor outcome) for their impact on performance using a new questionnaire called the Momentary Influences, Attitudes and Motivation Impact (MIAMI) on Cognitive Performance Scale.

Results

As expected, patients performed significantly worse than controls on all neurocognitive domains tested (large effect size, on average). However, patients also displayed more subjective momentary impairment, as well as more fears about the outcome and less motivation than controls. Mediation analyses indicated that these influences contributed to (secondary) poorer neurocognitive performance. Differences in neurocognitive scores shrank to a medium effect size, on average, when MIAMI scores were accounted for.

Conclusions

The data argue that performance on measures of neurocognition in schizophrenia are to a considerable extent due to secondary factors. Poor motivation, fears and momentary impairments distinguished patients from controls and these variables heavily impacted performance. Before concluding that neurocognitive deficits in psychiatric patients are present, clinicians should take these confounding influences into account. Although patients with schizophrenia achieved, on average, worse test scores than controls, a large subgroup displayed spared performance.

Keywords

Effortmotivationneurocognitionpsychosisschizophrenia
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 47 , Issue 15 , November 2017 , pp. 2602 - 2612
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

SM and JPK have equally contributed to the manuscript and share first authorship.

References

Abramovitch, A, Abramowitz, JS, Mittelman, A (2013). The neuropsychology of adult obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 33, 1163–1171.Google Scholar
Abramovitch, A, Schweiger, A (2015). Misuse of cognitive neuropsychology in psychiatry research: the intoxicating appeal of neo-reductionism. Behavior Therapist 38, 187–191.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association: Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Bentall, RP, Kinderman, P, Kaney, S (1994). The self, attributional processes and abnormal beliefs: towards a model of persecutory delusions. Behaviour Research and Therapy 32, 331–341.Google Scholar
Bora, E, Murray, RM (2014). Meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in ultra-high risk to psychosis and first-episode psychosis: do the cognitive deficits progress over, or after, the onset of psychosis? Schizophrenia Bulletin 40, 744–755.Google Scholar
Bora, E, Yucel, M, Pantelis, C (2009). Cognitive functioning in schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and affective psychoses: meta-analytic study. British Journal of Psychiatry 195, 475–482.Google Scholar
Brewer, WJ, Wood, SJ, Phillips, LJ, Francey, SM, Pantelis, C, Yung, AR, Cornblatt, B, McGorry, PD (2006). Generalized and specific cognitive performance in clinical high-risk cohorts: a review highlighting potential vulnerability markers for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32, 538–555.Google Scholar
Brickenkamp, R (1962). Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test Handanweisung d-2 [Attention-Pressure-Test Manual d2]. Hogrefe: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Carlsson, R, Nyman, H, Ganse, G, Cullberg, J (2006). Neuropsychological functions predict 1- and 3-year outcome in first-episode psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 113, 102–111.Google Scholar
Cella, M, Reeder, C, Wykes, T (2015). Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia-now it is really getting personal. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 4, 147–151.Google Scholar
Fatouros-Bergman, H, Cervenka, S, Flyckt, L, Edman, G, Farde, L (2014). Meta-analysis of cognitive performance in drug-naïve patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 158, 156–162.Google Scholar
Fervaha, G, Agid, O, Takeuchi, H, Lee, J, Foussias, G, Zakzanis, KK, Graff-Guerrero, A, Remington, G (2015). Extrapyramidal symptoms and cognitive test performance in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 161, 351–356.Google Scholar
Fervaha, G, Zakzanis, KK, Foussias, G, Graff-Guerrero, A, Agid, O, & Remington, G (2014). Motivational deficits and cognitive test performance in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 1058–1065.Google Scholar
Fett, AKJ, Viechtbauer, W, Dominguez, MDG, Penn, DL, van Os, J, Krabbendam, L (2011). The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35, 573–588.Google Scholar
Green, MF (1996). What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? American Journal of Psychiatry 153, 321–330.Google Scholar
Green, MF, Kern, RS, Braff, DL, Mintz, J (2000). Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the ‘right stuff’? Schizophrenia Bulletin 26, 119–136.Google Scholar
Green, MF, Kern, RS, Heaton, RK (2004). Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophrenia Research 72, 41–51.Google Scholar
Härting, C, Markowitsch, HJ, Neufeld, H, Calabrese, P, Deisinger, K, Kessler, J (2000). Wechsler Gedächtnistest - Revidierte Fassung (WMS-R) [Wechsler Memory Scale - revised version (WMS-R)] . Hans Huber: Bern.Google Scholar
Harvey, PD, Loewenstein, DA, Czaja, SJ (2013). Hospitalization and psychosis: Influences on the course of cognition and everyday functioning in people with schizophrenia. Neurobiology of Disease 53, 18–25.Google Scholar
Heaton, RK (1981). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, RW, Zakzanis, KK (1998). Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: a quantitative review of the evidence. Neuropsychology 12, 426–445.Google Scholar
Helmstaedter, C, Lendt, M, Lux, S (2001). VLMT Verbaler Lern- und Merkfähigkeitstest [VLMT Verbal Learning and Memory Test]. Belz Test: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Hovington, CL, Lepage, M (2012). Neurocognition and neuroimaging of persistent negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 12, 53–69.Google Scholar
Jacobs, C, Petermann, F (2007). Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene (WIE) [Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Adults]. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie 55, 205–208.Google Scholar
Keefe, RS, Silva, SG, Perkins, DO, Lieberman, JA (1999). The effects of atypical antipsychotic drugs on neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia: a review and meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Bulletin 25, 201–222.Google Scholar
Kinderman, P, Bentall, RP (1996). A new measure of causal locus: the internal, personal and situational attributions questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences 20, 261–264.Google Scholar
Kit, KA, Tuokko, HA, Mateer, CA (2008). A review of the stereotype threat literature and its application in a neurological population. Neuropsychology Review 18, 132–148.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E (1899). Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Aerzte [Psychiatry. A textbook for students and physicians]. J. A. Barth: Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kurtz, MM (2011). Neurocognition as a predictor of response to evidence-based psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia: what is the state of the evidence? Clinical Psychology Review 31, 663–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leucht, S, Kane, JM, Kissling, W, Hamann, J, Etschel, E, Engel, R (2005). Clinical implications of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores. British Journal of Psychiatry 187, 366–371.Google Scholar
Lezak, MD (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment. Neuropsychological Assessment, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Loong, JWK (1990). The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (IBM version) . Wang Neuropsychological Laboratory: San Luis Obispo, CA.Google Scholar
López-Muñoz, F, Álamo, C (2011). Neurobiological background for the development of new drugs in schizophrenia. Clinical Neuropharmacology 34, 111–126.Google Scholar
Mathews, SB, Arnold, SE, Epperson, CN (2014). Hospitalization and cognitive decline: can the nature of the relationship be deciphered? American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22, 465–480.Google Scholar
Mesholam-Gately, RI, Giuliano, AJ, Goff, KP, Faraone, SV, Seidman, LJ (2009). Neurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology 23, 315–336.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Birkner, C, Kloss, M, Jahn, H, Hand, I, Haasen, C, Krausz, M (2002). Executive functioning in obsessive-compulsive disorder, unipolar depression, and schizophrenia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 17, 477–483.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Heeren, D, Andresen, B, Krausz, M (2001). An analysis of the specificity and the syndromal correlates of verbal memory impairments in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 101, 23–31.Google Scholar
Moritz, S, Hottenrott, B, Jelinek, L, Brooks, AM, Scheurich, A (2012). Effects of obsessive-compulsive symptoms on neuropsychological test performance: complicating an already complicated story. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 26, 31–44.Google Scholar
Overall, JE, Gorham, DR (1962). The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports 10, 799–812.Google Scholar
Palmer, BW, Dawes, SE, Heaton, RK (2009). What do we know about neuropsychological aspects of schizophrenia? Neuropsychology Review 19, 365–384.Google Scholar
Pennington, CR, Heim, D, Levy, AR, Larkin, DT (2016). Twenty years of stereotype threat research: a review of psychological mediators. PLoS ONE 11, e0146487.Google Scholar
Reichenberg, A (2010). The assessment of neuropsychological functioning in schizophrenia. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 12, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reitan, RM (1992). Trail Making Test. Manual of Administration and Scoring. Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory: Tucson, AZ, USA.Google Scholar
Schaefer, J, Giangrande, E, Weinberger, DR, Dickinson, D (2013). The global cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: consistent over decades and around the world. Schizophrenia Research 150, 42–50.Google Scholar
Scheurich, A, Fellgiebel, A, Schermuly, I, Bauer, S, Wölfges, R, Müller, MJ (2008). Experimental evidence for a motivational origin of cognitive impairment in major depression. Psychological Medicine 38, 237–246.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Atzert, L (2004). Test d2: Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test [Test d2: attention-strain-test]. Diagnostik von Konzentration und Aufmerksamkeit 6th edn. Hogrefe: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Sheehan, DV, Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, KH, Amorim, P, Janavs, J, Weiller, E, Hergueta, T, Baker, R, Dunbar, GC (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59, 22–33.Google Scholar
Shin, NY, Lee, TY, Kim, E, Kwon, JS (2014). Cognitive functioning in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 44, 1121–1130.Google Scholar
Spencer, SJ, Steele, CM, Quinn, DM (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35, 4–28.Google Scholar
Strauss, GP, Morra, LF, Sullivan, SK, Gold, JM (2015). The role of low cognitive effort and negative symptoms in neuropsychological impairment in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology 29, 282–291.Google Scholar
Tombaugh, TN (2004). Trail making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19, 203–214.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, S, Fisher, M, Warm, H, Holland, C, Kirshner, MA, Pollock, BG (2009). The cognitive cost of anticholinergic burden: decreased response to cognitive training in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 166, 1055–1062.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) . Pearson: San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Wilson, B, Alderman, N, Burgess, P, Emslie, H, Evans, J (2003). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome (BADS). Journal of Occupational Psychology, Employment and Disability 5, 33–37.Google Scholar
Wilson, RS, Hebert, LE, Scherr, PA, Dong, X, Leurgens, SE, Evans, DA (2012). Cognitive decline after hospitalization in a community population of older persons. Neurology 78, 950–956.Google Scholar
Woodard, JL, Axelrod, BN (1987). Wechsler memory scale - revised. Psychological Assessment 7, 445–449. ST–Parsimonious prediction of Wechsler.Google Scholar
Wykes, T, Huddy, V, Cellard, C, McGurk, SR, Czobor, P (2011). A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. American Journal of Psychiatry 168, 472–485.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, P, Fimm, B (1995). Test for Attentional Performance (TAP) . PsyTest: Herzogenrath.Google Scholar