Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:22:29.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Levels-of-processing effect on internal source monitoring in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2006

J. DANIEL RAGLAND
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
ERIN McCARTHY
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
WARREN B. BILKER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
COLLEEN M. BRENSINGER
Affiliation:
Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
JEFFREY VALDEZ
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
CHRISTIAN KOHLER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
RAQUEL E. GUR
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
RUBEN C. GUR
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background. Recognition can be normalized in schizophrenia by providing patients with semantic organizational strategies through a levels-of-processing (LOP) framework. However, patients may rely primarily on familiarity effects, making recognition less sensitive than source monitoring to the strength of the episodic memory trace. The current study investigates whether providing semantic organizational strategies can also normalize patients' internal source-monitoring performance.

Method. Sixteen clinically stable medicated patients with schizophrenia and 15 demographically matched healthy controls were asked to identify the source of remembered words following an LOP-encoding paradigm in which they alternated between processing words on a ‘shallow’ perceptual versus a ‘deep’ semantic level. A multinomial analysis provided orthogonal measures of item recognition and source discrimination, and bootstrapping generated variance to allow for parametric analyses. LOP and group effects were tested by contrasting recognition and source-monitoring parameters for words that had been encoded during deep versus shallow processing conditions.

Results. As in a previous study there were no group differences in LOP effects on recognition performance, with patients and controls benefiting equally from deep versus shallow processing. Although there were no group differences in internal source monitoring, only controls had significantly better performance for words processed during the deep encoding condition. Patient performance did not correlate with clinical symptoms or medication dose.

Conclusions. Providing a deep processing semantic encoding strategy significantly improved patients' recognition performance only. The lack of a significant LOP effect on internal source monitoring in patients may reflect subtle problems in the relational binding of semantic information that are independent of strategic memory processes.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)