Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T01:57:39.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrophysiological and diffusion tensor imaging evidence of delayed corollary discharges in patients with schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2010

T. J. Whitford ,
D. H. Mathalon ,
M. E. Shenton ,
B. J. Roach ,
R. Bammer ,
R. A. Adcock ,
S. Bouix ,
M. Kubicki ,
J. De Siebenthal  and
A. C. Rausch
...Show all authors
T. J. Whitford*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
D. H. Mathalon
Affiliation:
Brain Imaging and EEG Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA Psychiatry Services, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
M. E. Shenton
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Clinical Neuroscience Division, Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Brockton Division, Harvard Medical School, Brockton, MA, USA
B. J. Roach
Affiliation:
Brain Imaging and EEG Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA Psychiatry Services, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
R. Bammer
Affiliation:
Radiological Sciences Laboratory, School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA
R. A. Adcock
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
S. Bouix
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
M. Kubicki
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Clinical Neuroscience Division, Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Brockton Division, Harvard Medical School, Brockton, MA, USA
J. De Siebenthal
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
A. C. Rausch
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
J. S. Schneiderman
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
J. M. Ford
Affiliation:
Brain Imaging and EEG Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA Psychiatry Services, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr T. J. Whitford, Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, 1249 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) characteristically exhibit supranormal levels of cortical activity to self-induced sensory stimuli, ostensibly because of abnormalities in the neural signals (corollary discharges, CDs) normatively involved in suppressing the sensory consequences of self-generated actions. The nature of these abnormalities is unknown. This study investigated whether SZ patients experience CDs that are abnormally delayed in their arrival at the sensory cortex.

Method

Twenty-one patients with SZ and 25 matched control participants underwent electroencephalography (EEG). Participants' level of cortical suppression was calculated as the amplitude of the N1 component evoked by a button press-elicited auditory stimulus, subtracted from the N1 amplitude evoked by the same stimulus presented passively. In the three experimental conditions, the auditory stimulus was delivered 0, 50 or 100 ms subsequent to the button-press. Fifteen SZ patients and 17 healthy controls (HCs) also underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and the fractional anisotropy (FA) of participants' arcuate fasciculus was used to predict their level of cortical suppression in the three conditions.

Results

While the SZ patients exhibited subnormal N1 suppression to undelayed, self-generated auditory stimuli, these deficits were eliminated by imposing a 50-ms, but not a 100-ms, delay between the button-press and the evoked stimulus. Furthermore, the extent to which the 50-ms delay normalized a patient's level of N1 suppression was linearly related to the FA of their arcuate fasciculus.

Conclusions

These data suggest that SZ patients experience temporally delayed CDs to self-generated auditory stimuli, putatively because of structural damage to the white-matter (WM) fasciculus connecting the sites of discharge initiation and destination.

Keywords

Arcuate fasciculusconduction delaysefference copyforward modelwhite matter
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 41 , Issue 5 , May 2011 , pp. 959 - 969
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aliu, S, Houde, J, Nagarajan, S (2009). Motor-induced suppression of the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21, 791–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartzokis, G (2002). Schizophrenia: breakdown in the well-regulated lifelong process of brain development and maturation. Neuropsychopharmacology 27, 672–683.Google Scholar
Basser, PJ, Pierpaoli, C (1996). Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series B 111, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumann, N, Pham-Dinh, D (2001). Biology of oligodendrocyte and myelin in the mammalian central nervous system. Physiological Reviews 81, 871–927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaulieu, C (2002). The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system: a technical review. NMR in Biomedicine 15, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, S, Smith, J, Steel, R, Johnstone, C, Frith, C (2000 a). The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring. Psychological Medicine 30, 1131–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, SJ, Wolpert, D, Frith, C (2000 b). Why can't you tickle yourself? Neuroreport 11, R11–R16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, SJ, Wolpert, DM, Frith, CD (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1, 635–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brusa, A, Jones, S, Plant, G (2001). Long-term remyelination after optic neuritis: a 2-year visual evoked potential and psychophysical serial study. Brain 124, 468–479.Google Scholar
Catani, M, Howard, RJ, Pajevic, S, Jones, DK (2002). Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain. NeuroImage 17, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catani, M, Thiebaut de Schotten, M (2008). A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections. Cortex 44, 1105–1132.Google Scholar
Cowan, J, Rothwell, J, Dick, J, Thompson, P, Day, B, Marsden, C (1984). Abnormalities in central motor pathway conduction in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2, 304–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crapse, T, Sommer, M (2008 a). Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9, 587–600.Google Scholar
Crapse, T, Sommer, M (2008 b). Corollary discharge circuits in the primate brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18, 552–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuypers, M, Dickson, K, Pinckers, A, Thijssen, J, Hommes, O (1995). Discriminative power of visual evoked potential characteristics in multiple sclerosis. Documenta Ophthalmologica 90, 247–257.Google Scholar
Dong, X, Jia, Y, Lu, S, Zhou, X, Cohen-Williams, M, Hodgson, R, Li, H, Priestley, T (2008). The antipsychotic drug, fluphenazine, effectively reverses mechanical allodynia in rat models of neuropathic pain. Psychopharmacology 195, 559–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgerton, B, Danhauer, J, Beattie, R (1977). Bone conduction speech audiometry in normal subjects. Journal of the American Audiology Society 3, 84–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Eliades, S, Wang, X (2003). Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations. Journal of Neurophysiology 89, 2194–2207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faravelli, C, Di Bernardo, M, Ricca, V, Benvenuti, P, Bartelli, M, Ronchi, O (1999). Effects of chronic lithium treatment on the peripheral nervous system. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 60, 306–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, I (1978). Efference copy and corollary discharge: implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 4, 636–640.Google Scholar
First, M, Spitzer, R, Gibbon, M, Williams, J (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), Clinician Version. American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, BJ (2002). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-Patient Edition (SCID-I/NP). Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P, Frith, C (2009). Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, J, Gray, M, Faustman, W, Roach, B, Mathalon, D (2007). Dissecting corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 44, 522–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, J, Mathalon, D, Kalba, S, Whitfield, S, Faustman, W, Roth, W (2001 a). Cortical responsiveness during talking and listening in schizophrenia: an event-related brain potential study. Biological Psychiatry 50, 540–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, JM, Mathalon, DH, Heinks, T, Kalba, S, Faustman, WO, Roth, WT (2001 b). Neurophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 158, 2069–2071.Google Scholar
Friston, KJ (1999). Schizophrenia and the disconnection hypothesis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandanavica. Supplementum 395, 68–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, CD (1992). The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hove, UK.Google Scholar
Gratton, G, Coles, M, Donchin, E (1983). A new method for the off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 55, 468–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruzelier, J (2000). Self regulation of electrocortical activity in schizophrenia and schizotypy: a review. Clinical Electroencephalography 31, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinks-Maldonado, T, Mathalon, D, Houde, J, Gray, M, Faustman, W, Ford, J (2007). Relationship of imprecise corollary discharge in schizophrenia to auditory hallucinations. Archives of General Psychiatry 64, 286–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S (1993). Visual evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Effect of time interval, age and disease dissemination. Journal of Neurology 240, 489–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanaan, R, Kim, J, Kaufmann, W, Pearlson, G, Barker, G, McGuire, P (2005). Diffusion tensor imaging in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 58, 921–929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesselring, J (1997). Multiple Sclerosis. Cambridge University Press: New York.Google ScholarPubMed
Konopaske, G, Dorph-Petersen, K, Sweet, R, Pierri, J, Zhang, W, Sampson, A, Lewis, D (2008). Effect of chronic antipsychotic exposure on astrocyte and oligodendrocyte numbers in macaque monkeys. Biological Psychiatry 63, 759–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubicki, M, McCarley, R, Westin, C, Park, H, Maier, S, Kikinis, R, Jolesz, F, Shenton, M (2007). A review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatry Research 41, 15–30.Google Scholar
Martikainen, M, Kaneko, K, Hari, R (2005). Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 15, 299–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, G, Donchin, E (1976). The effects of temporal and event uncertainty in determining the waveforms of the auditory event related potential (ERP). Psychophysiology 13, 581–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neuweiler, G (2003). Evolutionary aspects of bat echolocation. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 189, 245–256.Google Scholar
Pantev, C, Bertrand, O, Eulitz, C, Verkindt, C, Hampson, S, Schuierer, G, Elbert, T (1995). Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 94, 26–40.Google Scholar
Parker, G, Luzzi, S, Alexander, D, Wheeler-Kingshott, C, Ciccarelli, O, Lambon Ralph, M (2005). Lateralization of ventral and dorsal auditory-language pathways in the human brain. NeuroImage 24, 656–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paus, T, Perry, D, Zatorre, R, Worsley, K, Evans, A (1996). Modulation of cerebral blood flow in the human auditory cortex during speech: role of motor-to-sensory discharges. European Journal of Neuroscience 8, 2236–2246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrides, M, Pandya, DN (1988). Association fiber pathways to the frontal cortex from the superior temporal region in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 273, 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulet, J, Hedwig, B (2007). New insights into corollary discharges mediated by identified neural pathways. Trends in Neuroscience 30, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reznik, I, Volchek, L, Mester, R, Kotler, M, Sarova-Pinhas, I, Spivak, B, Weizman, A (2000). Myotoxicity and neurotoxicity during clozapine treatment. Clinical Neuropharmacology 23, 276–280.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, G, Kubicki, M, Nestor, P, Connor, E, Bushell, G, Markant, D, Niznikiewicz, M, Westin, C, Kikinis, R, Saykin, AJ, McCarley, R, Shenton, M (2008). Age-related deficits in fronto-temporal connections in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Schizophrenia Research 102, 181–188.Google Scholar
Schafer, E, Marcus, M (1973). Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science 181, 175–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, K (1957). Primary and secondary symptoms in schizophrenia. Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie 25, 487–490.Google ScholarPubMed
Shelley, A, Silipo, G, Javitt, D (1999). Diminished responsiveness of ERPs in schizophrenic subjects to changes in auditory stimulation parameters: implications for theories of cortical dysfunction. Schizophrenia Research 37, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taub, H, Raab, D (1969). Fluctuations of N1 amplitude in relation to click-intensity discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46, 969–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uranova, N, Vostrikov, V, Vikhreva, O, Zimina, I, Kolomeets, N, Orlovskaya, D (2007). The role of oligodendrocyte pathology in schizophrenia. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 10, 537–545.Google Scholar
Whitford, TJ, Kubicki, M, Shenton, ME (in press). The neuroanatomical underpinnings of schizophrenia and their implications as to the cause of the disorder: a review of the structural MR and diffusion literature. In Understanding Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Insights from Neuroimaging (ed. Shenton, M. E. and Turetsky, B.). Cambridge University Press: New York.Google Scholar