Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:55:12.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive deficit and the prediction of rehabilitation success in a chronic psychiatric group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Til Wykes  and
Graham Dunn
Til Wykes*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology, Biostatistics and Computing, Institute of Psychiatry, London
Graham Dunn
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology, Biostatistics and Computing, Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Til Wykes, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

This paper describes the second stage (years 4, 5 and 6) of a prospective follow-up of a sample of chronic patients which was designed to investigate the in service use. It also tested the relative predictive power of variables which included demographic, symptomatic and behavioural factors as well as a novel reaction time variable which reflects response processing time.

During the six years of the study 91% of the patients in the sample changed either the degree of their day and/or night care. Many moved to more independence but, a number did also become more dependent on psychiatric services. There were no differences in outcome between a schizophrenic group and patients with other diagnoses. These results suggest a level of flexibility in outcome even in a severely disabled chronic group.

The main predictor of future service use at each stage of the follow-up for the whole group was chronicity at entry to the study. But, when the group was divided into schizophrenic patients and ‘others’, the response processing measure was a significant predictor of service use in the schizophrenic group and accounted for between 17% and 30% of the variance. For the ‘other’ diagnostic group, the age of the patient seemed to be the major determinant of care.

The reaction time variable seems to be an extra class correlate of a strict diagnosis of schizophrenia. It may also be a stable or episodic vulnerability factor, but as well as these promising hypotheses, which have yet to be justified, this measure does seem to have pragmatic value in predicting outcome in a rehabilitation network.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 1992 , pp. 389 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cancro, R., Sutton, S., Kerr, J. & Sugarman, A. (1971). Reaction time and prognosis in acute schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 151, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, T. (1980). Positive and negative schizophrenic symptoms and the role of dopamine. British Journal of Psychiatry 137, 383–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenton, W. & McGlashan, T. (1987). Prognostic scale for chronic schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 13, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harding, C., Brooks, G., Ashikaga, T., Strauss, J. & Brier, A. (1987 a). The Vermont Longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness. I. Methodology, study sample and overall status 32 years later. American Journal of Psychiatry 144, 718–726.Google ScholarPubMed
Harding, C., Brooks, G., Ashikaga, T., Strauss, J. & Brier, A. (1987 b). The Vermont Longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness. II. Long term outcome for subjects who retrospectively met the DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 144, 727–735.Google Scholar
Hemsley, D. (1976). Attention and information processing in schizophrenia. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 15, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsley, D. (1978). Limitations of operant procedures in the modification of schizophrenic functioning: the possible relevance of studies of cognitive disturbance. Behaviour, Analysis and Modification 2, 165–173.Google Scholar
Knight, R., Elliott, D., Roff, J. & Watson, C. (1986). Concurrent and predictive validity of components of disordered thinking in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 12, 427–446.Google Scholar
McGlashan, T. (1986). The prediction of outcome in chronic schizophrenia. IV. The Chestnut Lodge follow-up study. Archives of General Psychiatry 43, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuechterlein, K. & Dawson, M. (1984). A heuristic vulnerability/stress model of schizophrenic episodes. Schizophrenia Bulletin 10, 300–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, G. (1980). Treatment in natural and special environments. In The Social Psychology of Psychological Problems(ed. Feldman, M. and Orford, J.), pp. 249–278. John Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1987). Formulation of new research strategies in schizophrenia. In Search for the Causes of Schizophrenia (ed. Háfner, H., Gattaz, W. and Janzarik, W.), pp. 29–38. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS/PC+ Version 3.1 (1988). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 2nd edn.McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donder&s method. Acta Psychologia 30, 275–315.Google Scholar
TAPS (1990). Better out than in? Report from the Fifth Annual Conference of the Team for Assessment of Psychiatric Services.North East Thames Regional Health Authority:London.Google Scholar
Tsuang, M. T., Woolson, R. & Fleming, J. (1979). Long-term outcome of major psychoses. I. Schizophrenia and affective disorders compared with psychiatrically symptom free surgical conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry 39, 1295–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickens, C. D. (1974). Temporal limits of human information processing: a developmental study. Psychological Bulletin 81, 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. V. & McGlashan, T. (1987). Schizo-affective psychosis. I. Comparative long-term outcome. Archives of General Psychiatry 44, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. K. & Brown, G. (1970). Institutionalism and Schizophrenia. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K. & Sturt, E. (1980). The PSE-ID Supplementary Manual. MRC Social Psychiatry Unit: London.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. & Sartorius, N. (1974). Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wykes, T. & Sturt, E. (1986). The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: An assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS. British Journal of Psychiatry 148, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wykes, T., Katz, R., Sturt, E. & Hemsley, D. (1992). Response processing in a chronic psychiatric group. A possible predictor of rehabilitation failure. British Journal of Psychiatry 160, 244–252.Google Scholar
Wykes, T., Sturt, E. & Katz, R. (1990). The prediction of rehabilitation success after three years: the use of social symptomatic and cognitive variables, British Journal of Psychiatry 157, 865–870.Google Scholar
Zahn, T. P. & Carpenter, W. T. (1978). Effects of short term outcome and clinical improvement on RT in acute schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric Research 14, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar