Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:37:48.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical and social variables which differentiate suicide, open and accident verdicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Solomon Jacobson ,
Christopher Bagley  and
Ann Rehin
Solomon Jacobson
Affiliation:
St Francis Hospital, Haywards Heath, Sussex and Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford
Christopher Bagley*
Affiliation:
St Francis Hospital, Haywards Heath, Sussex and Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford
Ann Rehin
Affiliation:
St Francis Hospital, Haywards Heath, Sussex and Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Christopher Bagley, Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A study has been made of cases coming before the Brighton coroner in the period 1970–2. Fifty cases in which a suicide verdict was recorded were specially studied, and relatives and acquaintances of the deceased were interviewed. The information thus obtained was compared with information available to the coroner in considering his verdict in 83 further cases in which he made a verdict of ‘suicide’. The reliability of thewhich the coroner's decision is based was largely validated. A study was made of variables which differentiated ‘suicide’ from 25 ‘open’ and 33 ‘accident’ cases considered by the same coroner. The prevalence of depression did not differentiate ‘suicide’ and ‘open’ cases, and this finding contradicts suggestions that the association of depression and suicide might be an artefact of the method of arriving at a suicide verdict. A number of other demographic and clinical factors did however significantly vary between ‘suicide’, ‘open’ and ‘accident’ cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , August 1976 , pp. 417 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, J. (1971). Societal reactions to suicide: the role of coroners' definitions. In Images of Deviance (ed. Cohen, S.). Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. (1973). Suicide, status integration and pseudoscience. Sociology 5, 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, M., Kessel, N. & Dalgaard, J. (1975). The comparability of suicide rates. British Journal of Psychiatry 127, 247–256.Google Scholar
Bagley, C. (1974). On the validity and meaning of suicide statistics. Sociology 6, 1–4.Google Scholar
Bagley, C., Jacobson, S. & Rehin, A. (1976). Completed suicide: a taxonomic analysis of clinical and social data. Psychological Medicine 6, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barraclough, B. (1972). Are the Scottish and English suicide rates really different? British Journal of Psychiatry 120, 267–273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barraclough, B. (1973). Differences between national suicide rates. British Journal of Psychiatry 122, 95–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barraclough, B. (1974). Poisoning cases: Suicide or accident? British Journal of Psychiatry 124, 526–530.Google Scholar
Brooke, E. (1974). Suicide and Attempted Suicide. World Health Organization: Geneva.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, J. (1967). The Social Meanings of Suicide. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1952). Suicide. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Holding, T. & Barraclough, B. (1975). Psychiatric morbidity in a sample of a London coroner's open verdicts. British Journal of Psychiatry 127, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P. & Walsh, D. (1975). Suicide in Dublin. I. The under-reporting of suicide and the consequences for national statistics. British Journal of Psychiatry 126, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, P. & Barraclough, B. (1968). Differences between suicide rates. Nature 220, 1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed