Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:25:49.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chinese version of the General Health Questionnaire: does language make a difference?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

David W. Chan
David W. Chan*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
*
1 Address for correspondence: Dr David W. Chan, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N. T., Hong Kong.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The English and Chinese versions of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) were administered to a sample of 72 bilingual respondents for the evaluation of version equivalence by a series of item analyses, reliability analyses and factor analyses. Although certain notable discrepancies were observed at the item level, the two versions were found to be comparable at the scale level. In addition, cogent evidence was provided for the relative robustness of the symptom dimensions as assessed by the two versions of the GHQ.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 147 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, S., Decalmer, P. & Haran, D. (1982). Community screening for mental illness: a validity study of the General Health Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychiatry 140, 174–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, D. W. (1984). Factor analysis of the HK-WISC at 11 age levels between 5 and 15 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52, 482–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, D. W. & Chan, T. S. C. (1983). Reliability, validity and the structure of the General Health Questionnaire in a Chinese context. Psychological Medicine 13, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M. (1981). Development of the Chinese MMPI in Hong Kong: Comparisons between the Chinese and the English versions.Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Personality Assessment,Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Cleary, P. D., Goldberg, I. D., Kescler, L. G. & Nycz, G. R. (1982). Screening for mental disorder among primary care patients. Archives of General Psychiatry 39, 837–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, M. H., Rose, S. & Cross, K. W. (1983). Life events, social interactions and psychiatric symptoms in general practice: a pilot study. Psychological Medicine 13, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlay-Jones, R. A. & Burvill, B. W. (1978). Contrasting demographic patterns of minor psychiatric morbidity in general practice and the community. Psychological Medicine 8, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlay-Jones, R. A. & Murphy, E. (1979). Severity of psychiatric disorder and the 30-item General Health Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 609–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P. (1978). Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. NFER Publishing Co.: London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. (1983). The use of screening questionnaires by family doctors. Unpublished, manuscript.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. & Blackwell, B. (1970). Psychiatric illness in general practice: a detailed study using a new method of case identification. British Medical Journal ii, 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., Kay, C. & Thompson, L. (1976 a). Psychiatric morbidity in general practice and the community. Psychological Medicine 6, 565–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P., Rickels, K., Downing, R. & Hesbacher, P. (1976 b). A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. British Journal of Psychiatry 129, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, D. P., Steele, J. J., Johnson, A. & Smith, C. (1982). Ability of primary care physicians to make accurate ratings of psychiatric symptoms. Archives of General Psychiatry 39, 829–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, S. B. (1981). A comparison of three indexes of agreement between observers: proportion of agreement, G-index and Kappa. Educational and Psychological Measurement 41, 1069–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis (3rd edn). University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Johnstone, A. & Goldberg, D. P. (1976), Psychiatric screening in general practice: a controlled study. Lancet i, 605–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina-Mora, M. E., Padilla, G. P., Campillo-Serrano, C., Mas, C. C., Ezbàn, M., Caraveo, J. & Corona, J. (1983). The factor structure of the GHQ: a scaled version for a hospital's general practice service in Mexico. Psychological Medicine 13, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mun¯oz, P. E., Vasquez, J. L., Pastrana, E., Rodriguez, F. & Oneca, C. (1978). Study of the validity of Goldberg's 60-item GHQ in its Spanish version. Social Psychiatry 13, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radovanović, Z. & Erić, L. J. (1983). Validity of the General Health Questionnaire in a Yugoslav student population. Psychological Medicine 13, 205–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problems. Psychometrika 31, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, C. (1977). The General Health Questionnaire: a valid index of psychological impairment in Australian populations. Medical Journal of Australia ii, 392–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieweg, B. W. & Hedlund, J. L. (1983). The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ): a comprehensive review. Journal of Operational Psychiatry 14, 74–81.Google Scholar
Von Ammon, C. (1983). The prevalence of emotional and cognitive dysfunction in a general medical population: using the MMSE, GHQ, and BDI. General Hospital Psychiatry 5, 15–24.Google Scholar
Waring, E. M., Weisz, G. M. & Grinberg, R. (1980). Life events, psychiatric screening, and psychosomatic illness. Southern Medical Journal 73, 339–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed