Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:03:05.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accuracy of diagnosing depression in primary care: the impact of chronic somatic and psychiatric co-morbidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2005

JASPER NUYEN
Affiliation:
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Utrecht, The Netherlands
ANITA C. VOLKERS
Affiliation:
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Utrecht, The Netherlands
PETER F. M. VERHAAK
Affiliation:
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Utrecht, The Netherlands
FRANÇOIS G. SCHELLEVIS
Affiliation:
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Utrecht, The Netherlands
PETER P. GROENEWEGEN
Affiliation:
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research) Utrecht, The Netherlands Department of Sociology and Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
GEERTRUDIS A. M. VAN DEN BOS
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background. Depression is highly co-morbid with both psychiatric and chronic somatic disease. These types of co-morbidity have been shown to exert opposite effects on underdiagnosis of depression by general practitioners (GPs). However, past research has not addressed their combined effect on underdiagnosis of depression.

Method. Co-morbidity data on 191 depressed primary-care patients selected by a two-stage sampling procedure were analysed. Diagnoses of major depression and/or dysthymia in the last 12 months were assessed using a standardized psychiatric interview (CIDI) and compared with depression diagnoses registered by GPs in patient contacts during the same period. Presence of psychiatric and chronic somatic co-morbidity was determined using the CIDI and contact registration, respectively.

Results. Regression analysis showed a significant interaction effect between psychiatric and chronic somatic co-morbidity on GPs’ diagnosis of depression, while taking into account the effects of sociodemographic variables, depression severity and number of GP contacts. Subsequent stratified analysis revealed that in patients without chronic somatic co-morbidity, a lower educational level, a less severe depression, and fewer GP contacts all significantly increased the likelihood of not being diagnosed as depressed. In contrast, in patients with chronic somatic co-morbidity, only having no psychiatric co-morbidity significantly decreased the likelihood of receiving a depression diagnosis.

Conclusions. Our results indicate that the effects of psychiatric co-morbidity and other factors on underdiagnosis of depression by GPs differ between depressed patients with and without chronic somatic co-morbidity. Efforts to improve depression diagnosis by GPs seem to require different strategies for depressed patients with and without chronic somatic co-morbidity.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)