No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Why psychiatric discharge summaries do not contain the mental state examination at discharge
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In an era where computerised information is dominant, it may seem an eccentric enterprise to assess the quality of case-notes and to propose changes in the notekeeping process. There are no institutional incentives for clinicians to provide organised and standardised clinical notes (Casper, 1987) and there is no clear evidence that poor notekeeping means that satisfactory care has not been provided.
- Type
- Training matters
- Information
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1992
References
Casper, E. S. (1987) A management system to maximise compliance with standards for medical records. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 38, 1191–1194.Google Scholar
Craddock, N. & Craddock, B. (1990) Audit of psychiatric discharge summaries. Psychiatric Bulletin, 14, 618–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, P. M.
et al (1987) Peer review as an aid to improving the completeness of psychiatric case notes. Medical education, 21, 493–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, C. & Fisher, S. K. (1981) Psychiatric Records in Mental Health Care.
New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Vort, W. V. & Mattson, M. R. (1989) A strategy for enhancing the clinical utility of the psychiatric record. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 407–409.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.