Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:18:46.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What would Adolf Meyer have thought of the neo-Kraepelinian approach?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

D. B. Double
D. B. Double*
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Because of the problem of diagnostic unreliability in psychiatry, there has been a trend over recent years to create explicit diagnostic criteria, such as the Research Diagnostic Criteria and DSM–III. This movement has been called neo-Kraepelinian (Klerman, 1978) as it promotes many of the ideas associated with the views of Kraepelin, regarded as the founder of modern psychiatry. It favours a biological approach and arose partially as a response to attacks on the ‘medical model’ in psychiatry.

Type
Articles
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 14 , Issue 8 , August 1990 , pp. 472 - 474
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1990

References

Klerman, G. L. (1978) The evolution of a scientific nosology. In Schizophrenia: Science and Practice (Ed. Shershow, J. C.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. (1951 and 1952) Collected Papers (Four Volumes). (Ed. Winters, E.). Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. (1986) A representative psychiatrist: the career, contributions and legacies of Sir Aubrey Lewis. Psychological Medicine Monograph Supplement 10.Google Scholar
Slater, E. & Roth, M. (1969) Clinical Psychiatry Third Edition. London: Bailliere, Tindall & Cassell.Google Scholar
Stengel, E. (1968) Book Review Inquiries in Psychiatry and The State of Psychiatry by Sir Aubrey Lewis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 127–129.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.